skills-for-humanity

	Skills
Think Sharper	/logic · /probability · /decision · /constraint · /game-theory · /epistemology · /investigation
Think Differently	/creativity · /analogy · /play
Think About People	/communication · /social · /emotional · /ethics · /identity · /narrative · /psychology · /mindset · /writing
Think in Time & Systems	/systems · /temporal · /historical · /resource · /strategy
See More Clearly	/aesthetic · /sensory

---

Each skill is a complete procedure: a defined problem type, a sequence of moves, a structured output. Not a concept to apply — a method to run.

Lineage: de Bono · Meadows · Altshuller · Minto · Goldratt · Tetlock · Klein · Mill · Kant · Aristotle · Noddings · Rawls · Sun Tzu · Clausewitz · Musashi · Nash · Axelrod · Vickrey · Shapley · Spence

---

Install

npx @human-avatar/skills-for-humanity

Run again to update. Restart Claude Code when done.

---

Use

/think

Describe your situation. Routes to the right methodology automatically. You don't need to know which skill fits — that's the point.

Every skill pauses before running and asks how deep you want to go.

---

Skills reference

Think Sharper

/logic

• /logic — Entry point for the logic toolkit.
• /logic-argument-validation — Check whether an argument's premises actually support its conclusion, and identify logical fallacies.
• /logic-causality-mapping — Map causal relationships, trace dependencies, and reason about consequences before acting.
• /logic-check — A fast, comprehensive logic report on any argument, plan, or reasoning — validates premises, tests inference, detects fallacies, surfaces hidden assumptions, and produces a verdict.
• /logic-consistency-check — Surface internal contradictions, conflicting requirements, and edge cases that expose hidden conflicts in a document, spec, plan, design, or set of requirements.
• /logic-constraint-mapping — Map the full constraint landscape for a decision, design, or plan — distinguishing hard limits from soft preferences, surfacing hidden constraints, and finding conflicts between them.
• /logic-council — Run a reasoning problem, argument, plan, or decision through a council of 5 logical reasoning advisors who analyze it from distinct reasoning frameworks, peer-review each other, and synthesize a verdict on whether the reasoning holds.

/probability