Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From skills-for-humanity
Runs four systematic passes to identify timeline errors, character logic violations, world-rule breaks, and physical continuity errors in a manuscript.
npx claudepluginhub human-avatar/skills-for-humanityHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/skills-for-humanity:s4h-writing-inconsistency-auditThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Inconsistencies undermine the reader's trust more efficiently than almost any other flaw — because they signal that the author lost track of their own world. The reader's contract with a story is: I will suspend disbelief in exchange for internal coherence. One visible inconsistency tells the reader the author may have lost the thread, and the reader will spend the rest of the story half-watchi...
Revises story projects with continuity-aware editing: chapter revisions, continuity audits, developmental edits, line edits, and timeline consistency checks while updating metadata and cross-references.
Audits campaign documents for plot continuity by cross-referencing NPCs, locations, timelines, items, and factions to detect contradictions, orphan references, and naming inconsistencies.
Provides structured revision and editing for Crucible-drafted novels, covering developmental, line, copy editing, and final polish after first draft completion.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Inconsistencies undermine the reader's trust more efficiently than almost any other flaw — because they signal that the author lost track of their own world. The reader's contract with a story is: I will suspend disbelief in exchange for internal coherence. One visible inconsistency tells the reader the author may have lost the thread, and the reader will spend the rest of the story half-watching for the next crack rather than being inside the experience.
Four types of inconsistency require separate passes, because they operate at different levels and have different causes:
Timeline inconsistency: Events that are out of chronological order, time spans that don't add up, characters who are in two places at once, seasons that shift unexpectedly.
Character logic inconsistency: Characters who act contrary to their established psychology without earned cause, who know things they couldn't know, who forget things they must know, who respond to situations in ways their established temperament doesn't allow.
World-rules inconsistency: The story's established physics, magic, technology, or social rules that function differently in different scenes — usually because the plot needs them to.
Physical continuity inconsistency: Objects that change hands, locations, or appearance without explanation; characters whose physical description changes; room layouts that contradict themselves.
Each pass requires a different diagnostic lens. Running all four in sequence is the only way to catch inconsistencies that don't show up in a single read.
Pass 1: Timeline Audit
Framing check: Confirm the specific manuscript and its scope before continuing. State what you've identified — the work being audited, its genre/setting, and the portion in scope (full manuscript, a chapter range, a specific scene) — in one sentence, then use AskUserQuestion:
Reconstruct the chronological order of events. Note every time marker: "the next morning," "three weeks later," "before she left," "the day after Marcus died." Build a timeline and check:
Flag: any event whose placement contradicts a stated time marker; any duration that doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
Pass 2: Character Logic Audit For each significant character, establish their baseline: what do they know, what is their temperament, what are they capable of? Then audit:
Flag: each instance with the character name, the violated baseline, and the location.
Pass 3: World-Rules Audit List the established rules of the world (physical, social, magical, technological). Then audit each instance where those rules appear:
Flag: each rule violation with the rule stated, the violation quoted, and whether it's a minor or structural inconsistency.
Pass 4: Physical Continuity Audit Track key objects, locations, and physical descriptions:
Flag: each contradiction with the original description, the contradicting description, and the locations of both.
Before proceeding, use the AskUserQuestion tool. State your interpretation of the situation in 1–2 sentences — what is being analyzed and what the core question is — then ask:
Proceed based on their selection. If the user reframes, incorporate the correction before running any analysis.
Timeline:
Character Logic:
World Rules:
Physical Continuity:
Summary: [Total issues by category and severity / The most critical fix required]
/s4h-writing-character-development for the character logic baseline — you need to know what was established before you can audit violations of it./s4h-writing-worldbuilding for the world-rules baseline — the audit can only flag violations if the rules are clearly stated./s4h-writing-pov because POV violations are a form of character logic inconsistency (the narration accesses knowledge the POV character doesn't have).After delivering this output, use AskUserQuestion to offer the next move:
/s4h-writing-voice-consistency — Fix the voice inconsistencies/s4h-writing-restructure — Restructure to resolve the structural inconsistencies/s4h-logic-consistency-check — Validate logical consistency alongside writing consistency