Stats
Actions
Tags
Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From skills-for-humanity
Applies Carol Dweck's growth mindset research as a practical methodology for reframing failure, challenge, comparison, and effort triggers. Use when fixed-mindset patterns block learning or persistence.
npx claudepluginhub human-avatar/skills-for-humanityHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/skills-for-humanity:s4h-mindset-growthThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
The growth mindset research that Carol Dweck and her colleagues produced over decades is genuinely different from the version that circulated as pop-psychology. The pop version says "believe you can improve and you will." The research says something more specific and harder: the way you *narrate your own experience* — particularly your experience of challenge and failure — shapes whether your b...
Shifts fixed-mindset beliefs to growth-mindset using neuroscience, reframing failure, and 'yet' language. Useful for overcoming challenge avoidance and effort withdrawal.
Routes to the right mindset tool based on your situation — stoic, growth, positive, reframe, or flow. Use when stuck in thought loops, treating failure personally, or wanting to flourish.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
The growth mindset research that Carol Dweck and her colleagues produced over decades is genuinely different from the version that circulated as pop-psychology. The pop version says "believe you can improve and you will." The research says something more specific and harder: the way you narrate your own experience — particularly your experience of challenge and failure — shapes whether your brain is in a state that learns or a state that protects.
The core distinction is not about being optimistic. It is about what you believe abilities are. Fixed mindset treats abilities as fixed traits: you have them or you don't, and performance reveals which. Growth mindset treats abilities as developable capacities: current performance is a starting point, not a verdict. These two beliefs produce entirely different responses to the same experience of struggling.
The mechanism is neurological as much as psychological: the brain changes through challenge and error-correction. Neurons that fire together wire together. The difficulty is the learning signal. A fixed mindset interprets difficulty as evidence of absence; a growth mindset interprets it as the mechanism of development.
Step 1: Identify the Fixed-Mindset Trigger Fixed mindset activates in specific, identifiable situations:
Challenge triggers: A task that feels beyond current capability. The fixed-mindset response: avoid it (if you don't try, you can't fail), do a minimum that covers exposure, or withdraw early.
Failure triggers: Making an error, producing poor work, falling short of a goal. The fixed-mindset response: the failure is evidence about you — your intelligence, talent, or worth — rather than about the current state of a learnable skill.
Comparison triggers: Encountering someone who performs the same domain more easily or more impressively. The fixed-mindset response: their ease reveals what you lack, rather than representing a different point on a developmental trajectory.
Effort triggers: Having to work hard at something that "should" come naturally. The fixed-mindset response: effort is the consolation prize of low talent; if you were truly capable, this would be easy.
Name the specific trigger in the current situation.
Framing check: Confirm the specific challenge or failure before continuing. State what you've identified — the actual situation, the trigger type, and what ability or identity is at stake — in one sentence, then use AskUserQuestion:
Step 2: Surface the Hidden Fixed-Mindset Belief Every fixed-mindset response rests on a belief that is usually invisible because it is never examined. Extract it explicitly.
The structure is always some version of: "If [X experience occurs], it means [fixed conclusion about my ability/identity]."
Examples:
The belief must be stated explicitly before it can be examined. Vague fixed-mindset affect ("I feel bad about this") cannot be worked with. The specific belief ("struggling here means I lack the talent for this type of work") can be.
Step 3: Examine the Belief Once surfaced, the belief can be tested:
The key question: Is this a verdict about what I am, or information about where I currently am?
Step 4: Reframe Through the Growth Lens Translate the fixed interpretation into its growth equivalent. This is not a verbal trick — it is a genuinely different interpretation that is equally or more consistent with the evidence.
Fixed → Growth translations:
| Fixed interpretation | Growth interpretation |
|---|---|
| "I failed at this → I can't do this" | "I failed at this → I now have specific information about what to improve" |
| "This is hard → I lack talent" | "This is hard → this is where the learning is happening" |
| "They're better → I don't belong here" | "They're better → there's more headroom here than I thought" |
| "I have to work hard → I'm not natural at this" | "I have to work hard → I'm at exactly the right difficulty level for growth" |
| "I got critical feedback → I'm not good enough" | "I got critical feedback → someone cared enough to give me specific information" |
The Dweck formulation of "not yet" is the cleanest encapsulation: "I can't do this" becomes "I can't do this yet." Not as a reassurance — as an accurate statement about the developmental nature of ability.
Step 5: Design the Learning Response Growth mindset produces a specific behavioral output: a concrete engagement with the challenge or failure as a learning signal.
The learning response is the proof that the mindset shift was real and not verbal. A person who has genuinely shifted will be curious about their failure; they will want to understand the gap. A person who has only said the words will avoid revisiting it.
Before proceeding, use the AskUserQuestion tool:
Situation: [The specific challenge, failure, or comparison that activated the response] Trigger type: Challenge / Failure / Comparison / Effort
The fixed-mindset belief: "If [X], it means [fixed conclusion]." Where it came from: [The implicit logic — where this belief made sense, even if it doesn't hold up]
Evidence it rests on: [What the person is using to support the conclusion] What the evidence actually shows: [The more accurate interpretation — not forced positivity, but what the evidence actually supports] The verdict: [Is this a verdict about what you are, or information about where you currently are?]
Fixed interpretation: [What was being believed] Growth interpretation: [The equally-supported but developmental interpretation] Not yet: [The "not yet" formulation for the specific belief — what cannot be done yet]
What the failure/difficulty reveals: [The specific gap — as precise as possible] The smallest next step: [A concrete action that engages that specific gap] What deliberate practice looks like: [The actual activity — not just "practice more"] Progress horizon: [A realistic timeframe and what to expect]
The most common misapplication of growth mindset is treating it as a verbal exercise: telling people (or yourself) to "just have a growth mindset." This doesn't work. The mindset shift has to happen at the level of how the specific experience is being narrated. That's why Step 2 — surfacing the hidden fixed-mindset belief explicitly — is non-negotiable. You can't shift something you can't see.
Praising process rather than talent is the other major research finding with practical implications: "you worked really hard on that" produces different neural and behavioral responses than "you're so smart." The former attributes the outcome to an action that can be repeated and varied; the latter attributes it to a fixed trait, which means the person is now in the business of protecting a reputation rather than developing a capability.
Nearest neighbors: mindset-reframe (for restructuring cognitive distortions about a situation, not specifically about ability development), mindset-stoic (for equanimity when the outcome is genuinely outside your control, not for developing through challenge). Use growth mindset when the issue is specifically about how failure and challenge relate to ability and identity.
After delivering this output, use AskUserQuestion to offer the next move:
/s4h-identity-values-clarification — Connect the growth orientation to underlying values/s4h-decision-premortem-analysis — Stress-test plans with growth assumptions examined/s4h-emotional-resistance-diagnosis — Diagnose resistance to the growth framing