From GTM Skills
Prepares meeting briefs with SPICED discovery, MEDDICC qualification, account research, attendee profiles, question banks, and competitive context. Use before discovery calls, demos, exec meetings, or deal reviews.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/gtm-skills:meeting-prepThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Win rates are decided before the call. This skill produces a one-page brief:
Win rates are decided before the call. This skill produces a one-page brief: account snapshot, attendee profiles, tailored question banks, and — for active deals — a MEDDICC gap analysis showing which dimensions still need evidence.
SPICED (Winning by Design) structures early discovery conversations.
Gap Selling (Keenan) deepens problem diagnosis — current state, future state, quantified gap, root cause, happy-ears guardrails.
MEDDICC (Andy Whyte) scores deal qualification with evidence. They do not
contradict — SPICED uncovers; MEDDICC scores. Both map to the same CRM fields
defined in pipeline-management.
For full sales process design, load pipeline-management first.
references/keenan-gap-selling.md.| Call Type | Lead With | Score With |
|---|---|---|
| First discovery | SPICED + Gap Selling (current state) | Light MEDDICC (note gaps) |
| Second+ meeting | SPICED gaps + Gap (future state) | Full MEDDICC scorecard |
| Pre-proposal / exec | Economic buyer prep | MEDDICC must be ≥10/14 |
| Deal review (internal) | — | MEDDICC evidence inspection |
Per attendee: role, tenure, priorities, LinkedIn activity, likely MEDDICC role (Champion? Economic Buyer? Technical Buyer? Blocker?).
| SPICED | Question Examples |
|---|---|
| Situation | "Walk me through how your team handles [process] today." |
| Pain | "What's the most frustrating part of that approach?" |
| Impact | "What does that cost you annually — rough order of magnitude?" |
| Critical Event | "Why is fixing this a priority now versus six months from now?" |
| Decision | "If we find a fit, what does your evaluation process look like?" |
| Dimension | Question Examples | Confirmed When |
|---|---|---|
| Metrics | "How would you measure success 12 months after implementation?" | Baseline + target KPI documented |
| Economic Buyer | "Who ultimately approves budget for initiatives like this?" | EB named; meeting scheduled or completed |
| Decision Criteria | "What are the must-haves vs nice-to-haves in your evaluation?" | Criteria list documented |
| Decision Process | "Walk me through each step from today to signed contract." | Steps, owners, dates mapped |
| Identify Pain | "What happens if this problem isn't solved by [date]?" | Quantified cost of inaction |
| Champion | "Would you be comfortable presenting this internally without us?" | Four-part Champion test passed |
| Competition | "Who else are you evaluating — including doing nothing?" | Competitors + status quo named |
Score the contact before calling them a Champion:
| # | Criterion | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Power to influence the decision | Can access EB and decision committee |
| 2 | Personal win if deal closes | Career, team, or KPI benefit articulated |
| 3 | Articulates problem without you | Repeats pain accurately in their words |
| 4 | Commits to internal selling | Agrees to present or multi-thread on your behalf |
All four required for Champion score = 2. Enthusiasm alone = 1 at best.
If CRM data exists, score current state and list gaps to close on this call:
MEDDICC Score: __/14
Gaps to close this meeting:
- [ ] Metrics — need quantified baseline
- [ ] Economic Buyer — identified but not met
- ...
Load pipeline-management for stage gate minimums before advancing the deal.
competitive-intel)One-page meeting brief. Use templates/output-template.md for structure.
# Meeting Brief: [Company]
Date | Attendees | Deal stage | MEDDICC score: __/14
## Company Snapshot
## Attendee Profiles (+ MEDDICC role)
## SPICED Questions (discovery)
## MEDDICC Questions (gaps to close)
## Champion Test (if applicable)
## Competitive Context
## Desired Outcome + Fallback
MEDDICC as a discovery script. Running all seven dimensions on a first call feels like an audit. Fix: SPICED first; MEDDICC scores build over calls.
Champion = friendly contact. Enthusiasm without power is score 1, not 2. Fix: apply Whyte's four-part Champion test.
Vendor-defined Metrics. "You'll save 30%" is not M=2. Fix: buyer must name the KPI and baseline.
Ignoring status quo as Competition. "No competitors" still has a competitor: do nothing. Fix: always assess status quo.
SPICED and MEDDICC in separate silos. Reps capture Impact in SPICED notes but leave Metrics blank. Fix: Impact field populates Metrics in CRM.
references/framework-notes.md — SPICED/MEDDICC map, Champion test, question bankstemplates/output-template.md — one-page brief structurescripts/check-output.py — validates brief sectionsreferences/keenan-gap-selling.md — Gap Selling discovery, PIC, happy ears, checklistspipeline-management — Stage gates, CRM fields, MEDDICC scorecard rulessales-coaching — Manager deal review using same scorecardcompetitive-intel — Battlecards for Competition dimensionmulti-thread-orchestration — When Champion cannot access EB aloneroi-calculator — Metrics dimension business casedemo-scripts — Post-discovery demo structurenpx claudepluginhub leadmagic/gtm-skills --plugin gtm-skillsRun structured discovery calls using SPIN, Sandler, or Challenger frameworks with tailored question sets and call guides. Use this skill whenever a rep needs help preparing discovery questions, is about to do a first call with a new prospect, wants a discovery call template, says "what questions should I ask", "help me prepare for a discovery call", "I need a call guide", or is working on improving their discovery process. Also trigger when someone mentions SPIN selling, Sandler, Challenger, or gap selling in a sales context.
Activate for: pre-call brief, before the call, prepare for call, meeting prep, call prep, discovery prep, demo prep, before meeting, call preparation, what should I know before, deal health, deal review, deal brief, opportunity review, account review, QBR prep, renewal prep. NOT for: prospect research (use prospect-research), outreach drafting (use outreach), post-call follow-up (use follow-up), pipeline reporting (use pipeline).
Applies the SPIN Selling methodology (Situation, Problem, Implication, Need-Payoff) to improve complex B2B sales conversations, discovery questions, and deal advancement.