revedres-submission

Submission Preflight (revedres-submission)

When to trigger

• The review is complete and you are about to upload to Manuscript Central
• You need a last pass on masking, APA 7, the abstract limit, and the file set
• You are unsure which files RER expects (blinded vs. unblinded title page, bios)
• You want to confirm reporting-standard attachments before the portal flags an incomplete submission

RER intake at a glance (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准)

Item	What RER expects
Portal	Manuscript Central / ScholarOne: mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rer
Artefact	A comprehensive, critical, integrative review — no original empirical research unless incorporated in a broader review
Style	APA 7th edition throughout
Abstract	≤ 150 words, with keywords (separately and on page 2 after the blinded title page)
File format	Microsoft Word (not PDF) — the system converts it
Files	(a) separate unblinded title page with APA-7 Author Note; (b) main manuscript with a BLINDED title page, abstract + keywords, and the body incl. tables/figures; (c) Author Bios
Masking	Manuscript anonymized for masked review; anonymize only limited-circulation self-citations (forthcoming/in press/unpublished), not ordinary published self-cites
Reporting standards	Systematic reviews/meta-analyses: consult PRISMA and the APA Reporting Standards for Research in Psychology (MARS/JARS)
Volatile	Fee, exact length limit, current editors/contact, and timelines — re-confirm on the SAGE/AERA RER pages

Preflight (work top to bottom)

1. Venue fit. It is a review (systematic / meta-analytic / critical-integrative), not original empirical research — else route per revedres-editor-strategy.
2. Masking is correct. Body de-identified; blinded title page in the main file; only limited-circulation self-citations anonymized; a separate unblinded title page + Author Note + Author Bios prepared.
3. APA 7 conformance. Citations, references, headings, tables, figures, and bias-free language all APA 7th.
4. Abstract ≤ 150 words, review-style, with keywords, in both required locations.
5. Exhibits attached and reconciling. PRISMA flow (counts reconcile), study table with risk-of-bias, forest/funnel for meta-analyses — embedded in the Word file.
6. Reporting-standard checklists completed (PRISMA, MARS) and registration (PROSPERO/OSF) cited; open-materials links ready.
7. File set + format. Word (not PDF); the three-file set (unblinded title page / blinded main manuscript / Author Bios) assembled.
8. Volatile re-confirms. Fee, length, current editors/contact, and any policy specifics checked on the official RER pages today.

See templates/checklist.md for the full last-pass list.

Checklist

• Artefact is a review, not original empirical research
• Body masked; blinded title page in main file; only limited-circulation self-cites anonymized
• Separate unblinded title page + APA-7 Author Note + Author Bios prepared
• APA 7 throughout (citations, references, headings, bias-free language)
• Abstract ≤ 150 words, review-style, with keywords, in both locations
• PRISMA flow / study table / forest / funnel embedded and reconciling
• PRISMA + MARS checklists done; PROSPERO/OSF registration cited; open materials ready
• Files in Word (not PDF); three-file set assembled for Manuscript Central
• Volatile facts (fee, length, editors/contact) re-confirmed on the RER pages today

Anti-patterns

• Uploading a PDF when RER asks for Word
• Leaving author names in the body or blinding ordinary published self-citations (over-anonymizing)
• A 200+-word abstract, or one written like a single-study report
• Missing the unblinded title page or Author Bios → an incomplete submission
• No PRISMA/MARS checklist attached for a systematic review/meta-analysis
• Asserting fee/length/editor facts from memory instead of re-checking the official pages

Output format

【Venue fit】review (not original empirical)? Y/N
【Masking】body blinded; blinded title page in main file; only ltd-circ self-cites anonymized? Y/N
【File set】unblinded title page + blinded manuscript + Author Bios, all Word? Y/N
【APA 7】citations/refs/headings/bias-free language conform? Y/N
【Abstract】≤150 words, review-style, keywords, both locations? Y/N
【Exhibits】PRISMA + study table + forest/funnel embedded and reconciling? Y/N
【Reporting standards】PRISMA + MARS done; PROSPERO/OSF cited; open materials ready? Y/N
【Volatile re-confirmed】fee / length / editors / portal checked today? Y/N
【Next step】→ revedres-revision (after the decision letter)