From review-of-educational-research-skills
Plans revisions and drafts point-by-point response letters for RER review/meta-analysis decision letters. Helps triage reviewer comments and decide which requests to adopt or push back on.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/review-of-educational-research-skills:revedres-revisionThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- An RER decision letter arrived (major/minor revision, or reject-and-resubmit)
RER reviews are refereed against rigor of the synthesis and rigor of the review process. Most revision requests fall into recognizable buckets — diagnose each before drafting.
| Reviewer request | What it really demands | Skill to revisit |
|---|---|---|
| "Expand/justify the search" | a more exhaustive or better-documented search; updated PRISMA | revedres-literature-synthesis |
| "This reads as a summary" | a stronger, more reconciling organizing framework | revedres-organizing-framework |
| "Address heterogeneity / bias" | I², moderators, funnel/Egger, sensitivity analyses | revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance |
| "Coding reliability unclear" | reported κ/ICC and a shared codebook | revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility |
| "You vote-count conflicting work" | weigh by estimand + design; steelman camps | revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance |
| "Over-reliance on your own work" | re-balance citations identity-blind | revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance |
| "Tighten / APA / abstract" | prose, APA 7, ≤150-word abstract | revedres-writing-style |
【Decision】major | minor | reject-and-resubmit
【Triage】comments grouped by theme + editor/reviewer weight? Y/N
【Search updated】PRISMA re-run + propagated to tables/analysis/prose? Y/N
【Analysis adds】heterogeneity / bias / sensitivity added where asked? Y/N
【Transparency adds】κ/ICC + codebook clarified if flagged? Y/N
【Balance】conflict handling credibility-weighted; self-cites re-balanced? Y/N
【Response letter】point-by-point with exact change + location for every comment? Y/N
【Push-backs】out-of-scope/incorrect requests declined with cited reasons? Y/N
【Next step】→ revedres-submission (re-run preflight before resubmitting)
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin review-of-educational-research-skillsStructures a response letter for a Psychological Bulletin revise-and-resubmit on a meta-analysis. Use when reviewer requests demand changes to the search, eligibility, model, or bias analyses.
Drafts response-to-referees letters and revision plans for REStat decision letters. Structures point-by-point replies, triages comments, and flags identification/measurement objections.
Drafts point-by-point SMR rebuttal letters with revision plans for properties, simulations, empirical illustrations, and software under verbatim-comment response format.