By sxg
Review and critique scientific manuscripts. Identifies critical issues with detailed explanations and recommendations, providing an overall assessment with accept/revise/reject recommendation.
Reviews scientific manuscripts for academic rigor and significance. Evaluates the validity of the research question, strength of conclusions, novelty, and value to readers in the field.
Reviews scientific manuscripts for statistical and methodological rigor. Evaluates whether statistical methods are appropriate, correctly executed, and completely reported.
A marketplace of Claude Code plugins for scientific research and writing.
/plugin marketplace add sxg/biomedical-science-writer
/plugin install writer@science
| Plugin | Description | Version |
|---|---|---|
| writer | Draft biomedical research manuscripts with specialist agents | 2.3.0 |
Draft biomedical research manuscripts from organized project folders containing papers, data, figures, and GitHub code repositories.
Features:
Commands:
/writer:draft - Full workflow/writer:literature - Literature review only/writer:methods - Code analysis only/writer:results - Results interpretation only/writer:synthesize - Generate Discussion/Abstract/writer:assemble - Final assemblyTo add a new plugin to this marketplace:
Create a directory under plugins/:
plugins/my-new-plugin/
├── .claude-plugin/
│ └── plugin.json
├── commands/
├── skills/
└── agents/
Add the plugin entry to .claude-plugin/marketplace.json:
{
"name": "my-new-plugin",
"source": "my-new-plugin",
"description": "Plugin description",
"version": "1.0.0"
}
MIT
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
npx claudepluginhub sxg/biomedical-science-writer --plugin reviewerDraft scientific research manuscripts from organized project folders with papers, data, figures, and GitHub code repositories. Orchestrates an 8-step workflow with specialist agents: statistical reviewer for quantitative accuracy, academic reviewer for publication readiness.
论文评审 — 5 人评审团队 + EIC:方法学、领域、统计、批判性、视角多维度审稿
Rigorous, fair peer review in two modes. (A) Red-team your OWN draft before you submit — a simulated panel (a generous champion, the brutal Reviewer 2, a novelty-hawk Area Chair) predicts the reviews and hands you a prioritized fix list. (B) Review SOMEONE ELSE'S paper when you're an assigned reviewer or helping your advisor — a fair, venue-formatted, submission-ready review. Grounded in official NeurIPS/ICLR/ACL reviewer guidelines; every criticism pinned to a location and checked against ACL's H1–H17 list of illegitimate critiques. No invented flaws.
Pre-submission AI review and editing for CS-conference papers: direct-edit LaTeX or Markdown (Word via one-time extraction), run an adversarial multi-agent courtroom review with consensus-gated revisions, or run it unattended toward a goal.
Document review skills from Draft Detective: AI-powered checks that help authors catch issues in their documents before publication.
Diagnostic editorial intelligence for writing across contexts — papers, blogs, books, grants. Analyzes, diagnoses, and translates rather than generating from scratch.
Academic manuscript toolkit: peer review, manuscript writing, and journal-specific formatting for submission