Stats
Actions
Tags
Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From reviewer
Review and critique a scientific manuscript, identifying critical issues with recommendations
npx claudepluginhub joshuarweaver/cascade-content-creation-misc-1 --plugin sxg-scienceHow this command is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/reviewer:reviewThe summary Claude sees in its command listing — used to decide when to auto-load this command
# Review Manuscript
Review the scientific manuscript at the provided path.
## Usage
## What This Does
1. Reads the manuscript (PDF or Markdown)
2. Runs statistical review (methodology, statistics, results reporting)
3. Runs academic review (significance, validity, conclusions)
4. Combines findings into a ranked list of issues
5. Generates overall assessment with accept/revise/reject recommendation
6. Saves review as `{manuscript-name}-review.md`
## Invoke Skill
Use the `reviewer:review` skill with the manuscript path:/paper-reviewReview an academic manuscript for methodological rigor, statistical validity, and clarity
/reviewPerforms PhD-level peer review of academic manuscripts and research proposals provided as text, URL, or draft file path.
/paper-reviewSimulates a skeptical ML conference reviewer to generate a critical paper review with scored weaknesses and prioritized fixes.
/paper-reviewRuns pre-submission audit of current paper using parallel review agents, checking content, arguments, numbers, references, DOIs, writing, figures, formatting, replication. Produces severity-ranked report with journal-readiness checklist.
/reviewPeer reviews PR/FAQ .tex document for quality and decision readiness against Working Backwards and Kahneman frameworks, providing PASS/ITERATE/REJECT assessment, issues, strengths, next steps, and edit offers.
/reviewReviews research, plan, or brainstorm documents with structured critique via desplega:reviewing skill. Supports --autonomy=autopilot|critical|verbose and --output=append|separate flags.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Review the scientific manuscript at the provided path.
/reviewer:review path/to/manuscript.pdf
/reviewer:review path/to/manuscript.md
{manuscript-name}-review.mdUse the reviewer:review skill with the manuscript path:
Skill: reviewer:review
Args: {manuscript_path}