From reviewer
Review and critique a scientific manuscript, identifying critical issues with recommendations
npx claudepluginhub joshuarweaver/cascade-content-creation-misc-1 --plugin sxg-science# Review Manuscript
Review the scientific manuscript at the provided path.
## Usage
## What This Does
1. Reads the manuscript (PDF or Markdown)
2. Runs statistical review (methodology, statistics, results reporting)
3. Runs academic review (significance, validity, conclusions)
4. Combines findings into a ranked list of issues
5. Generates overall assessment with accept/revise/reject recommendation
6. Saves review as `{manuscript-name}-review.md`
## Invoke Skill
Use the `reviewer:review` skill with the manuscript path:/reviewInvokes external AI CLIs (Gemini, Claude, Codex, OpenCode, Qwen, Cursor) to peer review specified phase plans, producing structured REVIEWS.md with feedback.
/reviewReviews staged changes or recent commits across five axes—correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance—producing categorized findings with file:line references and fixes.
/reviewRuns Codex code review on local git state (working tree or vs base branch). Supports --wait/--background, --base <ref>, --scope auto|working-tree|branch.
/reviewOrchestrates multi-LLM code review across Codex, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and others; checks provider availability and posts inline PR comments.
/reviewReviews HTML file for design anti-patterns, principles violations, and accessibility issues. Generates markdown report with status tables and recommendations.
/reviewReviews specified code scope via four specialists (quality, security, performance, architecture), producing summary, detailed findings, refactoring suggestions, prioritized action plan.
Review the scientific manuscript at the provided path.
/reviewer:review path/to/manuscript.pdf
/reviewer:review path/to/manuscript.md
{manuscript-name}-review.mdUse the reviewer:review skill with the manuscript path:
Skill: reviewer:review
Args: {manuscript_path}