Stats
Actions
Tags
'%20stop-opacity%3D'0.16'%2F%3E%3Cstop%20offset%3D'1'%20stop-color%3D'rgb(200%2C90%2C60)'%20stop-opacity%3D'0.03'%2F%3E%3C%2FlinearGradient%3E%3C%2Fdefs%3E%3Crect%20width%3D'320'%20height%3D'200'%20fill%3D'url(%23g)'%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D'250'%20cy%3D'56'%20r%3D'92'%20fill%3D'rgb(200%2C90%2C60)'%20fill-opacity%3D'0.06'%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D'64'%20cy%3D'172'%20r%3D'58'%20fill%3D'rgb(200%2C90%2C60)'%20fill-opacity%3D'0.05'%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E)
From reviewer
Review and critique a scientific manuscript, identifying critical issues with recommendations
How this command is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/reviewer:reviewThe summary Claude sees in its command listing — used to decide when to auto-load this command
# Review Manuscript
Review the scientific manuscript at the provided path.
## Usage
## What This Does
1. Reads the manuscript (PDF or Markdown)
2. Runs statistical review (methodology, statistics, results reporting)
3. Runs academic review (significance, validity, conclusions)
4. Combines findings into a ranked list of issues
5. Generates overall assessment with accept/revise/reject recommendation
6. Saves review as `{manuscript-name}-review.md`
## Invoke Skill
Use the `reviewer:review` skill with the manuscript path:Review the scientific manuscript at the provided path.
/reviewer:review path/to/manuscript.pdf
/reviewer:review path/to/manuscript.md
{manuscript-name}-review.mdUse the reviewer:review skill with the manuscript path:
Skill: reviewer:review
Args: {manuscript_path}
npx claudepluginhub sxg/biomedical-science-writer --plugin reviewer/paper-reviewReview an academic manuscript for methodological rigor, statistical validity, and clarity
/reviewPerforms PhD-level peer review of academic manuscripts and research proposals. Accepts text, URL, or file path as input.
/paper-reviewSimulates a skeptical ML conference reviewer to generate a critical paper review with scored weaknesses and prioritized fixes.
/paper-reviewRuns pre-submission audit of current paper using parallel review agents, checking content, arguments, numbers, references, DOIs, writing, figures, formatting, replication. Produces severity-ranked report with journal-readiness checklist.
/ars-reviewerSimulates a full peer-review panel on academic papers using the ARS academic-paper-reviewer skill. Also supports quick, methodology-focus, re-review, guided, and calibration modes.
/reviewPerforms a structured peer review of a PR/FAQ document against Working Backwards and decision quality frameworks, returning a pass/iterate/reject verdict with issues and next steps.