Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
By rpatrik96
Diagnose and improve writing across papers, blogs, books, and grants with argument analysis, clarity diagnostics, register translation, and quantitative grading.
npx claudepluginhub rpatrik96/research-agora --plugin editorialVisualize the logical skeleton of a paper's argument as a claim-evidence DAG. Use when asked to "map my argument", "does my logic hold", "argument structure", "find logical gaps", or "why doesn't my paper flow". Flags missing links, orphan claims, circular reasoning, and unsupported assertions.
Context-aware editorial intelligence that adapts to what you're writing. Use when asked to "edit this", "review my writing", "editorial feedback", "developmental edit", "line edit", "improve clarity", "simplify writing", "check readability", "reduce jargon", or "make paper clearer". Detects format (paper/blog/book/grant), section type, and draft phase, then routes to the appropriate editorial lens — developmental, line, or copy editing.
Translate writing between registers — paper to blog, blog to book chapter, academic to conversational. Use when asked to "convert this for blog", "make this more conversational", "translate register", "paper to blog", "blog to book", or "adapt for audience". Performs structural transformation, not just tone adjustment.
Diagnose root causes of bad writing at the paragraph level. Use when asked to "diagnose this paragraph", "why does this suck", "what's wrong with this", "writing diagnosis", or "debug my writing". Identifies patterns like cognitive overload, buried ledes, idea soup, and monotonous rhythm — then teaches the fix.
Quantitative writing quality verification for scientific papers. Use when asked to "score my writing", "grade this paper", "writing quality check", "verify writing quality", "how good is my writing", "rate my prose", "writing metrics", "readability analysis", "check my paper's clarity", "writing score", or "assess writing quality". Produces a structured report with A-F grade, dimension scores, and prioritized fix suggestions.
No model invocation
Executes directly as bash, bypassing the AI model
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge.
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge.
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Multi-agent orchestrator for academic writing: 12 specialist agents and 30 writing principles for review, research, drafting, polishing, bibliography auditing, and literature surveys.
Production-grade academic research pipeline for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize. 4 skills, 35+ modes, 38-agent ensemble, v3.7.3 + v3.8 L3 claim-faithfulness gate, v3.9.0 cross-index triangulation, v3.9.2 phase boundary fence (#133).
Academic paper writing skills for ML conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AAAI)
Orchestrate manuscript revision by routing feedback to specialized writing skills
Citation, prose, figure, and rigor auditing for AI-assisted research drafts.
16-Skill Claude Code plugin for academic paper writing, polishing, and submission.
Microsoft Office document creation skills (PowerPoint, Word, Excel)
Academic paper writing skills for ML conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AAAI)
Document and LaTeX formatting skills for publication-quality output
Development automation skills for Python projects
Specialized research analysis agents for critical thinking, evidence verification, synthesis, and parallel paper analysis
A community-driven skills marketplace for AI-assisted research. Browse, install, and share modular AI workflows for ML research.
Browse Skills | Platform Design | Contributing
Reading time: PI: 5 min | Researcher: 15 min | Student: 10 min
npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code # if you don't have Claude Code yet
In a Claude Code session, run:
/plugin marketplace add rpatrik96/research-agora
/plugin install academic@research-agora
/plugin install development@research-agora
/plugin install formatting@research-agora
/plugin install office@research-agora
/plugin install editorial@research-agora
/plugin install research-agents@research-agora
New here? Run
/onboardin Claude Code, or take the 2-minute quiz in your browser — no installation needed.
Run citation verification on any project with a .bib file:
cd /path/to/your/project && claude
/paper-references
Every entry marked mismatch or not found is a potential hallucinated or corrupted reference. Cost: ~$0.10–0.30.
No .bib file? No CLI? Take the onboarding quiz — it runs in your browser and recommends where to start.
61 public AI workflows for the full paper lifecycle. Skills encode your group's standards in a shared CLAUDE.md — every student and postdoc runs the same verified checks.
CLAUDE.md, (3) Set verification standards, (4) Review monthly.Start with: Quickstart → Verification guide → CLAUDE.md template
| I want to... | Run this |
|---|---|
| Verify citations | /paper-references |
| Critical review of my draft | /paper-review path/to/paper.pdf |
| Find related work | /literature-synthesizer |
| Debug LaTeX | /latex-debugger |
| Clean up code | /code-simplify |
Not sure which skill? Run /choose-skill — describe your task and get matched recommendations.
Start with: Quickstart → Examples by domain → CLAUDE.md template
AI tools amplify expertise — they don't replace it. Verify everything. Build understanding before optimizing speed.
Week 1: Run /paper-references on your bibliography. Check 3 entries manually.
Week 2: Set up CLAUDE.md for your project with /onboard.
Week 3: Try /paper-review on a section draft. Do you agree with the critique?
Week 4: Connect GitHub MCP, try /pr-automation.
Rule of thumb: If you couldn't do the task without AI, the AI shouldn't do it for you yet.
Start with: Concepts → Examples → Verification guide
| Doc | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Quickstart | Install → first task → 5-minute win |
| Concepts | Evolution stack, key terms, delegate vs. protect |
| Verification | TDR recipes, hierarchy, limits |
| Privacy & GDPR | Compliance checklist, paid plans, medical data |
| Examples | Domain-specific prompts by use case |
| CLAUDE.md Template | Commented template — customizing it IS the tutorial |
Paper writing, research, and dissemination skills: