Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
By codearranger
Draft, format, and file Washington civil-practice documents for any county or subject-matter area (consumer debt, family law, landlord-tenant, personal injury, employment, commercial disputes, or CPA/CEMA) using Washington-specific rules, venue templates, and automatic fact-checking.
npx claudepluginhub codearranger/claude-legal --plugin wa-court-docsBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Use this skill for Washington Commercial Electronic Mail Act (CEMA, RCW 19.190) matters — claims (or defense) over commercial spam e-mail and commercial text messages sent to Washington residents with a false or misleading subject line or a misrepresented transmission path. Triggers include "CEMA", "Commercial Electronic Mail Act", "RCW 19.190", "19.190.020", "19.190.030", "19.190.040", "spam email lawsuit", "spam text message", "false subject line", "misleading subject line", "deceptive subject line", "$500 per email", "commercial electronic mail message", "commercial electronic text message", "CAN-SPAM", "CAN-SPAM preemption", "Old Navy", "Brown v. Old Navy", "Wright v. Lyft", "Chen v. Sur La Table", "per se CPA violation spam", "class action spam Washington", "header falsification", "from line spoofing", "promotional email subject line". Covers the CEMA elements, the post-2025 *Brown v. Old Navy* broad reading of the subject-line prohibition, the per se Consumer Protection Act route and CEMA's $500 statutory damages, common defenses (CAN-SPAM savings-clause preemption, the commercial-purpose gate, consent, the pending 2026 amendment), and fact-pattern triage. Composes with wa-consumer-debt (the CPA / Hangman Ridge framework), wa-first-30-days, wa-discovery, wa-draft-motion / -declaration, wa-law-references, wa-statewide-format, and wa-pro-se.
Use when handling a Washington commercial-disputes matter — breach of contract under common law + UCC sales (RCW 62A.2), the **Washington Consumer Protection Act (CPA) at RCW 19.86** as the state's general unfair-competition + deceptive-act statute (with the **Hangman Ridge 5-element test** and treble damages + mandatory attorney's fees), the **Washington Business Corporation Act at RCW 23B** (shareholder rights, director duties, dissenters' appraisal rights, judicial dissolution), the Washington LLC Act at RCW 25.15 (2016 overhaul), partnership under RCW 25.05, the **UCC at RCW 62A** (Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9A), the WA Mandatory Arbitration of Civil Actions (MAR) regime, forum-selection / choice-of-law enforcement, and the Washington enactment of statute of frauds at RCW 19.36. Substantive framework lives in RCW Title 19 (business regulation, CPA), Title 23B (corporations), Title 25 (partnerships + LLCs), Title 62A (UCC), and Title 7 (special proceedings, MAR). Current treble-damages cap, MAR jurisdictional cap, and section-level rules live in the references corpus, not embedded here. Triggers include "Washington commercial dispute", "WA breach of contract", "WA CPA", "Washington CPA", "RCW 19.86", "Hangman Ridge", "WA dissolution corporation", "RCW 23B", "WA UCC", "RCW 62A", "WA dissenter's rights", "WA judicial dissolution LLC", "Washington MAR", "RCW 7.06".
Use this skill for Washington consumer-debt defense — debt-buyer suits, original-creditor collection cases, and any matter turning on the FDCPA, CFPB Regulation F, the Washington Collection Agency Act (RCW 19.16), or the Washington Consumer Protection Act (RCW 19.86) as applied to debt collection. Triggers include "debt buyer", "I was sued on a credit card", "collection agency sued me", "FDCPA", "1692e", "1692f", "1692g", "validation notice", "Regulation F", "12 CFR 1006", "Hangman Ridge", "RCW 19.16", "RCW 19.86", "RCW 19.16.440", "CPA counterclaim", "statute of limitations on this debt", "time-barred debt", "zombie debt", "re-aged debt", "chain of title", "bill of sale", "assignment schedule", "original cardholder agreement", "monthly statements", "Certificate of Indebtedness", "remote custodian", "ER 803 business records", "ER 901 authentication", "Ziegler", "Discover Bank v. Bridges", "CACH", "Unifund", "Palisades", "Midland", "Portfolio Recovery", "LVNV", "Velocity Investments", "Jefferson Capital", "Gray v. Suttell", "Panag", "unlicensed collection agency". Covers substantive law, fact-pattern triage, chain-of-title doctrine, and discovery targeting the elements a debt buyer must prove. Composes with wa-first-30-days (initial response), wa-discovery (procedure), wa-law-references (civil rules, evidence rules, fees-and-costs, local rules, online sources), wa-statewide-format, wa-kcdc, and wa-pro-se.
This skill should be used when drafting or filing civil documents in a Washington county court other than King County District Court — i.e., the district courts (and, secondarily, the superior court clerks) of the state's most populous counties: Pierce (Tacoma), Snohomish (Everett / Lynnwood / Monroe / Arlington), Spokane, Clark (Vancouver), Thurston (Olympia), Kitsap (Port Orchard), Yakima, Whatcom (Bellingham), and Benton (Kennewick). Triggers include the county name plus "district court" / "superior court" / "where do I file" / "e-filing portal" / "LINX" / "local rules" / "civil motion calendar", or a case venued in one of those counties. For King County District Court use the dedicated `wa-kcdc` skill instead. Layer this on top of `wa-statewide-format`, and consult `wa-law-references` for the per-court LCR / LCRLJ local-rule text.
Use this skill for Washington Consumer Protection Act (CPA / UDAP) claims and defenses — the general unfair-or-deceptive-acts statute, RCW 19.86, applicable to any consumer or business matter (not just debt or B2B). This is the matter-neutral CPA home that the subject-matter bundles compose with. Triggers include "Consumer Protection Act", "Washington CPA", "RCW 19.86", "19.86.020", "19.86.090", "19.86.093", "UDAP", "unfair or deceptive act or practice", "unfair business practice", "deceptive practice", "consumer fraud", "Hangman Ridge", "five elements", "public interest element", "per se CPA violation", "capacity to deceive", "treble damages", "$25,000 cap", "attorney fees CPA", "trade or commerce", "injury to business or property", "Panag", "Klem", "Indoor Billboard", "Michael v. Mosquera-Lacy", "Short v. Demopolis", "Nordstrom v. Tampourlos", "regulated industry exemption", "19.86.170", "serve the attorney general", "19.86.095", "CPA statute of limitations", "19.86.120", "CPA counterclaim". Covers the five Hangman Ridge elements, the unfair-vs-deceptive distinction (Klem), the codified public-interest factors (RCW 19.86.093), per se pathways, remedies (actual + treble capped at $25,000 + mandatory attorney fees + injunction), the 4-year SOL, the regulated-industry exemption, and AG service. Composes with wa-consumer-debt (RCW 19.16 per se), wa-commercial-disputes (B2B CPA), wa-cema (RCW 19.190 per se), wa-first-30-days, wa-discovery, wa-draft-motion / -declaration, wa-law-references, wa-statewide-format, and wa-pro-se.
Comprehensive skill pack with 66 specialized skills for full-stack developers: 12 language experts (Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust, C++, Swift, Kotlin, C#, PHP, Java, SQL, JavaScript), 10 backend frameworks, 6 frontend/mobile, plus infrastructure, DevOps, security, and testing. Features progressive disclosure architecture for 50% faster loading.
Comprehensive feature development workflow with specialized agents for codebase exploration, architecture design, and quality review
Tools to maintain and improve CLAUDE.md files - audit quality, capture session learnings, and keep project memory current.
Develop, test, build, and deploy Godot 4.x games with Claude Code. Includes GdUnit4 testing, web/desktop exports, CI/CD pipelines, and deployment to Vercel/GitHub Pages/itch.io.
Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notices, and proposed orders for Indiana courts. Applies Indiana Trial Rule 5(E) statewide formatting; includes Marion Superior Court and Lake Superior Court specifics plus a county-courts roll-up; supports pro se workflows. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (Ind. Trial R. civil rules, Ind. Evid. R. evidence rules, fees and costs, local rules, citation format per the Indiana Citation Manual) plus subject-matter bundles. Two subject-matter bundles ship: in-consumer-debt (FDCPA / Reg F / IUCCC / DCSA / chain-of-title doctrine) and in-family-law (paternity at IC 31-14 — the JP case-type backbone, dissolution at IC 31-15 under Indiana's equitable-distribution regime, child support at IC 31-16 with the Indiana Child Support Guidelines court rule, custody and parenting time at IC 31-17 with the Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines court rule, adoption at IC 31-19, UCCJEA at IC 31-21, DCS / CHINS / TPR / delinquency at IC 31-25 / 31-30 / 31-32 / 31-34 / 31-35 / 31-37, protection orders at IC 34-26-5). The in-family-court venue skill covers Indiana's family-law topology — no separate Family Court trial court; large counties (Marion, Lake, Allen, Vanderburgh, Hamilton, St. Joseph) have dedicated Juvenile Divisions; smaller counties (like Bartholomew) consolidate family-law jurisdiction in the Circuit Court. Follows a thin-skill architecture: SKILL.md bodies describe procedural frameworks and point at the references corpus for current statutory text, dollar thresholds, day counts, and section subsections rather than embedding them. All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.
Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notices of motion, and proposed orders for California superior courts. Applies California Rules of Court 2.100-2.119 statewide formatting; includes Los Angeles Superior Court (LASC — Stanley Mosk Courthouse) and San Francisco Superior Court (SFSC — Civic Center Courthouse, Dept. 302 law-and-motion) specifics plus a county-courts roll-up for the most-populous counties (Orange, San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Santa Clara, Alameda, Sacramento, Contra Costa, Fresno, Kern); supports pro se ('In Pro Per') workflows. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (CCP civil rules with the 35-special-interrogatory cap and the 45-day jurisdictional motion-to-compel-further deadline, CEC evidence rules including § 1271 business-records foundation, fees and costs under CCP §§ 1032/1033.5 and § 1717 reciprocal attorney's fees, local rules for LASC + SFSC + populous counties, citation format per the California Style Manual, CRC 8.1115 unpublished-opinion rule, deadline arithmetic under CCP §§ 12/12a/12c with Govt. Code § 6700 holidays, hearings under the CRC 3.1308 tentative-ruling regime, the CCP § 1005(b) 16-court-day motion-notice framework, summary judgment under CCP § 437c) plus subject-matter bundles. The first subject-matter bundle, ca-consumer-debt, covers FDCPA / Reg F (federal), the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788-1788.33 — reaches both first-party and third-party collectors), the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788.50-1788.66 — heightened pleading + documentation for debt buyers), the California Debt Collection Licensing Act (Cal. Fin. Code §§ 100000-100027 — DFPI licensure since 2022), the Unfair Competition Law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200-17210), the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1750-1784), chain-of-title doctrine under Cal. Comm. Code Art. 9, fact-pattern triage, and synthetic example filings. All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.
Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notices, and proposed orders for Ohio courts. Applies Ohio Civ. R. 10 + per-court local rules statewide formatting; includes Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas (Cleveland) and Franklin County Court of Common Pleas (Columbus) specifics plus a county-courts roll-up, with verbatim local rules for Cuyahoga and Delaware Common Pleas; supports pro se workflows. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (Ohio Civ. R. civil rules, Ohio Evid. R. evidence rules, fees and costs, local rules, citation format per the Ohio Manual of Citations) plus five subject-matter bundles: oh-consumer-debt (FDCPA / Reg F / Ohio CSPA / chain-of-title), oh-family-law (R.C. 3105/3109/3119 equitable-distribution + income-shares), oh-personal-injury (R.C. 2315 comparative fault + damages caps + OPLA + R.C. 2744 immunity), oh-employment (R.C. 4112 discrimination as amended by the 2021 Uniformity Act + workers' comp + whistleblower), and oh-commercial-disputes (OUTSA trade secrets + R.C. 1706 LLC Act + arbitration + business torts). All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.
Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notes for hearing, and proposed orders for Oregon circuit courts. Applies UTCR 2.010 statewide formatting; includes Multnomah County Circuit Court (Portland) and Washington County Circuit Court (Hillsboro) specifics plus a county-court roll-up for the other most-populous counties (Clackamas, Lane, Marion, Jackson, Deschutes, Linn, Benton, Yamhill, Polk, Douglas); supports pro se workflows. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (ORCP civil rules, OEC evidence rules, ORS 20 fees and costs, local SLR rules, citation format per the Oregon Appellate Courts Style Manual, online sources, discovery, first-30-days response, hearings, filing packets, post-judgment, fact-checking, deadlines under ORCP 10 + ORS 187.010 holidays) plus subject-matter bundles that plug into the procedural skills. The first subject-matter bundle, or-consumer-debt, covers FDCPA, Reg F, ORS 697 (Collection Agency Registration), the Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA, ORS 646.605 et seq.), chain-of-title doctrine, fact-pattern triage, and synthetic example filings for debt-buyer defense. The architecture leaves clean slots for future bundles (landlord-tenant under ORS 90, family, personal injury, etc.). All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.
Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notices, and proposed orders for Colorado courts. Applies C.R.C.P. 10 + Chief Justice Directive 11-01 statewide formatting (uniform 1-inch margins, double-spaced text, 12-point font, the two-block Colorado caption with the case-number / division / courtroom box); includes Denver District Court (2nd Judicial District) and Arapahoe County District Court (18th Judicial District) specifics plus a roll-up for the other most-populous counties (Jefferson, El Paso, Adams, Boulder, Larimer, Douglas, Weld, Pueblo, Mesa, Broomfield); supports pro se / self-represented workflows including CCEFS Pro Se and the JDF (Judicial Department Forms) catalog. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (C.R.C.P. civil rules with the 21-day answer window and C.R.C.P. 121 § 1-15 motion-practice timing, CRE evidence rules, fees and costs under C.R.S. art. 16 of title 13, local rules and Chief Justice Directives, citation format per the Colorado Appellate Court conventions, deadline arithmetic under C.R.C.P. 6 with C.R.S. § 24-11-101 holidays including Frances Xavier Cabrini Day and Juneteenth, hearings under the Cisco Webex statewide remote-appearance protocol, post-judgment under C.R.C.P. 59/60 and the C.R.S. § 13-54.5 garnishment regime) plus subject-matter bundles. Two subject-matter bundles ship: (1) co-consumer-debt covering FDCPA, Reg F, the Colorado Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (CFDCPA — C.R.S. art. 16 of title 5, recodified from Title 12 in 2022), the Colorado Consumer Protection Act (CCPA — C.R.S. art. 1 of title 6 with treble damages and mandatory fees), the Uniform Consumer Credit Code (UCCC — C.R.S. art. 1-9 of title 5), Colorado collection-agency licensure under the AG's Collection Agency Board, chain-of-title doctrine under Colorado UCC Article 9 (C.R.S. art. 9 of title 4), the 6-year SOL under C.R.S. § 13-80-103.5(1)(a), fact-pattern triage, and synthetic example filings; and (2) co-family-law covering the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act (UDMA — C.R.S. art. 10 of title 14), the 91-day residency and 91-day waiting-period requirements under C.R.S. § 14-10-106, dissolution / legal separation / declaration of invalidity (annulment) under C.R.S. § 14-10-111, the C.R.C.P. 16.2 mandatory financial-disclosure regime including the Sworn Financial Statement (JDF 1111), allocation of parental responsibilities under C.R.S. § 14-10-124 (replaces 'custody' terminology), the C.R.S. § 14-10-115 income-shares child-support guideline with the 93-overnight rule and statewide online worksheet (JDF 1820 E), maintenance under the C.R.S. § 14-10-114 guideline framework as amended in 2014 and 2024, common-law marriage under People v. Lucero and In re Marriage of Hogsett & Neale, and post-decree modification under C.R.S. § 14-10-122. All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge.
Sign in to claimShare bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Browser automation and end-to-end testing MCP server by Microsoft. Enables Claude to interact with web pages, take screenshots, fill forms, click elements, and perform automated browser testing workflows.
Comprehensive PR review agents specializing in comments, tests, error handling, type design, code quality, and code simplification