Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
By codearranger
Draft, format, and file Oregon circuit court pleadings, motions, declarations, orders, and hearing notices with UTCR 2.010 compliance, county-specific rules for Multnomah and Washington counties, and consumer-debt defense workflows under FDCPA, Reg F, and UTPA.
npx claudepluginhub codearranger/claude-legal --plugin or-court-docsUse this skill for Oregon consumer-debt defense — debt-buyer suits, original-creditor collection cases, and any matter turning on the FDCPA, CFPB Regulation F, the Oregon Collection Agency Registration Act (ORS 697.005 et seq.), or the Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA, ORS 646.605 et seq.) as applied to debt collection. Triggers include "debt buyer", "I was sued on a credit card", "collection agency sued me", "FDCPA", "1692e", "1692f", "1692g", "validation notice", "Regulation F", "12 CFR 1006", "UTPA", "Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices", "ORS 646.605", "ORS 646.608", "ORS 646.638", "ORS 697", "ORS 697.005", "ORS 697.015", "ORS 697.058", "UTPA counterclaim", "statute of limitations on this debt", "ORS 12.080", "time-barred debt", "zombie debt", "re-aged debt", "chain of title", "bill of sale", "assignment schedule", "original cardholder agreement", "monthly statements", "Certificate of Indebtedness", "remote custodian", "OEC 803 business records", "OEC 901 authentication", "OEC 902(11)", "CACH", "Unifund", "Palisades", "Midland", "Portfolio Recovery", "LVNV", "Velocity Investments", "Jefferson Capital", "unlicensed collection agency in Oregon", "DCBS registration", "Phillips v. Beaverton". Subject-matter bundle of FDCPA / Reg F / Oregon UTPA / ORS 697 substantive law plus chain-of-title doctrine and discovery banks (RFPs, RFAs) for debt-defense litigation in Oregon circuit court. Composes with all matter-neutral procedural skills (or-statewide-format, or-multcc / or-wccc / or-county-courts, or-pro-se, or-law-references, or-discovery, or-first-30-days, or-fact-check, or-deadlines, or-post-judgment, and all draft-* skills).
This skill should be used when drafting or filing civil documents in an Oregon circuit court other than Multnomah or Washington County — i.e., the circuit courts of the state's other most populous counties: Clackamas (Oregon City), Lane (Eugene), Marion (Salem), Jackson (Medford), Deschutes (Bend), Linn (Albany), Benton (Corvallis), Yamhill (McMinnville), Polk (Dallas), and Douglas (Roseburg). Triggers include the county name plus "Circuit Court" / "where do I file" / "eFile" / "File and Serve" / "local rules" / "civil motion calendar", or a case venued in one of those counties. For Multnomah use `or-multcc`; for Washington County (Oregon) use `or-wccc`. Layer on top of `or-statewide-format`, and consult `or-law-references` for the per-court SLR text.
Use this skill whenever the user asks about timing or deadlines in an Oregon civil case. Triggers include "when is my answer due", "when is the response brief due", "compute the deadline", "how many court days", "what's the reply deadline", "I was served — when do I have to answer", "when does my discovery response have to go out", "how long do I have to file a motion to vacate", "exemption claim deadline", "FDCPA statute of limitations", "UTPA statute of limitations", "is this deadline past". Computes court-day and calendar-day deadlines under ORCP 10 using ORS 187.010 holidays (with Saturday→Friday / Sunday→Monday observed-day rule), and covers FDCPA SOL, garnishment timing (ORS 18.600+), post-judgment (ORCP 71, ORCP 64, ORS 19.255 for appeals), and Oregon debt SOL. Deterministic date arithmetic is delegated to `scripts/case-calendar.py`.
This skill should be used when drafting, responding to, or compelling discovery in an Oregon civil case across any subject matter. Triggers include "requests for production", "RFP", "depositions", "RFA", "requests for admission", "meet and confer", "ORCP 36 conference", "ORCP 46 motion", "motion to compel", "discovery responses", "discovery objections", "ORCP 43 objections", "privilege log", "proportionality", "ORCP 43 limits", "ORCP 39", "ORCP 45", "ORCP 46", "no interrogatories in Oregon", "Oregon discovery rules". Covers the matter-neutral procedural framework: discovery request drafting, response drafting and objections, meet-and-confer mechanics, and the full motion-to-compel workflow with mandatory fee-shifting under ORCP 46 A(4)(a). **Important Oregon quirk**: written interrogatories are NOT available under the ORCP as a matter of right — the available discovery tools are depositions (ORCP 39), requests for production (ORCP 43), physical/mental exams (ORCP 44), and requests for admission (ORCP 45). Subject-matter- specific request banks (e.g., debt-buyer RFPs targeting chain of title) live with the relevant subject-matter skill (e.g., or-consumer-debt). Compose with or-statewide-format, or-pro-se, or-law-references, or-draft-motion, and or-fact-check.
Use this skill when the user asks to draft a declaration for an Oregon court filing. Triggers include "draft a declaration", "declaration in support", "declaration of defendant", "declaration of plaintiff", "witness declaration", "affidavit" (Oregon uses declarations under penalty of perjury per ORCP 1 E in place of notarized affidavits for most filings), and "declaration with exhibits". Scaffolds a declaration with numbered paragraphs, verification clause (ORCP 1 E), signature block, and optional exhibit cover pages. Composes with `or-statewide-format` (always), `or-multcc` / `or-wccc` / `or-county-courts` (court-specific), and `or-pro-se` (if the declarant is pro se).
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge.
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge.
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Comprehensive skill pack with 66 specialized skills for full-stack developers: 12 language experts (Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust, C++, Swift, Kotlin, C#, PHP, Java, SQL, JavaScript), 10 backend frameworks, 6 frontend/mobile, plus infrastructure, DevOps, security, and testing. Features progressive disclosure architecture for 50% faster loading.
Comprehensive feature development workflow with specialized agents for codebase exploration, architecture design, and quality review
Core skills library for Claude Code: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques
Harness-native ECC plugin for engineering teams - 64 agents, 262 skills, 84 legacy command shims, reusable hooks, rules, MCP conventions, and operator workflows for Claude Code plus adjacent agent harnesses
UI/UX design intelligence. 67 styles, 161 palettes, 57 font pairings, 25 charts, 15 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, Astro, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind, shadcn/ui, Nuxt, Jetpack Compose). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient.
This skill should be used when users need to generate ideas, explore creative solutions, or systematically brainstorm approaches to problems. Use when users request help with ideation, content planning, product features, marketing campaigns, strategic planning, creative writing, or any task requiring structured idea generation. The skill provides 30+ research-validated prompt patterns across 14 categories with exact templates, success metrics, and domain-specific applications.
Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notices, and proposed orders for Indiana courts. Applies Indiana Trial Rule 5(E) statewide formatting; includes Marion Superior Court and Lake Superior Court specifics plus a county-courts roll-up; supports pro se workflows. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (Ind. Trial R. civil rules, Ind. Evid. R. evidence rules, fees and costs, local rules, citation format per the Indiana Citation Manual) plus subject-matter bundles. Two subject-matter bundles ship: in-consumer-debt (FDCPA / Reg F / IUCCC / DCSA / chain-of-title doctrine) and in-family-law (paternity at IC 31-14 — the JP case-type backbone, dissolution at IC 31-15 under Indiana's equitable-distribution regime, child support at IC 31-16 with the Indiana Child Support Guidelines court rule, custody and parenting time at IC 31-17 with the Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines court rule, adoption at IC 31-19, UCCJEA at IC 31-21, DCS / CHINS / TPR / delinquency at IC 31-25 / 31-30 / 31-32 / 31-34 / 31-35 / 31-37, protection orders at IC 34-26-5). The in-family-court venue skill covers Indiana's family-law topology — no separate Family Court trial court; large counties (Marion, Lake, Allen, Vanderburgh, Hamilton, St. Joseph) have dedicated Juvenile Divisions; smaller counties (like Bartholomew) consolidate family-law jurisdiction in the Circuit Court. Follows a thin-skill architecture: SKILL.md bodies describe procedural frameworks and point at the references corpus for current statutory text, dollar thresholds, day counts, and section subsections rather than embedding them. All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.
Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notices of motion, and proposed orders for California superior courts. Applies California Rules of Court 2.100-2.119 statewide formatting; includes Los Angeles Superior Court (LASC — Stanley Mosk Courthouse) and San Francisco Superior Court (SFSC — Civic Center Courthouse, Dept. 302 law-and-motion) specifics plus a county-courts roll-up for the most-populous counties (Orange, San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Santa Clara, Alameda, Sacramento, Contra Costa, Fresno, Kern); supports pro se ('In Pro Per') workflows. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (CCP civil rules with the 35-special-interrogatory cap and the 45-day jurisdictional motion-to-compel-further deadline, CEC evidence rules including § 1271 business-records foundation, fees and costs under CCP §§ 1032/1033.5 and § 1717 reciprocal attorney's fees, local rules for LASC + SFSC + populous counties, citation format per the California Style Manual, CRC 8.1115 unpublished-opinion rule, deadline arithmetic under CCP §§ 12/12a/12c with Govt. Code § 6700 holidays, hearings under the CRC 3.1308 tentative-ruling regime, the CCP § 1005(b) 16-court-day motion-notice framework, summary judgment under CCP § 437c) plus subject-matter bundles. The first subject-matter bundle, ca-consumer-debt, covers FDCPA / Reg F (federal), the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788-1788.33 — reaches both first-party and third-party collectors), the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788.50-1788.66 — heightened pleading + documentation for debt buyers), the California Debt Collection Licensing Act (Cal. Fin. Code §§ 100000-100027 — DFPI licensure since 2022), the Unfair Competition Law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200-17210), the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1750-1784), chain-of-title doctrine under Cal. Comm. Code Art. 9, fact-pattern triage, and synthetic example filings. All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.
Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notices, and proposed orders for Ohio courts. Applies Ohio Civ. R. 10 + per-court local rules statewide formatting; includes Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas (Cleveland) and Franklin County Court of Common Pleas (Columbus) specifics plus a county-courts roll-up, with verbatim local rules for Cuyahoga and Delaware Common Pleas; supports pro se workflows. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (Ohio Civ. R. civil rules, Ohio Evid. R. evidence rules, fees and costs, local rules, citation format per the Ohio Manual of Citations) plus five subject-matter bundles: oh-consumer-debt (FDCPA / Reg F / Ohio CSPA / chain-of-title), oh-family-law (R.C. 3105/3109/3119 equitable-distribution + income-shares), oh-personal-injury (R.C. 2315 comparative fault + damages caps + OPLA + R.C. 2744 immunity), oh-employment (R.C. 4112 discrimination as amended by the 2021 Uniformity Act + workers' comp + whistleblower), and oh-commercial-disputes (OUTSA trade secrets + R.C. 1706 LLC Act + arbitration + business torts). All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.
Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notices, and proposed orders for Colorado courts. Applies C.R.C.P. 10 + Chief Justice Directive 11-01 statewide formatting (uniform 1-inch margins, double-spaced text, 12-point font, the two-block Colorado caption with the case-number / division / courtroom box); includes Denver District Court (2nd Judicial District) and Arapahoe County District Court (18th Judicial District) specifics plus a roll-up for the other most-populous counties (Jefferson, El Paso, Adams, Boulder, Larimer, Douglas, Weld, Pueblo, Mesa, Broomfield); supports pro se / self-represented workflows including CCEFS Pro Se and the JDF (Judicial Department Forms) catalog. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (C.R.C.P. civil rules with the 21-day answer window and C.R.C.P. 121 § 1-15 motion-practice timing, CRE evidence rules, fees and costs under C.R.S. art. 16 of title 13, local rules and Chief Justice Directives, citation format per the Colorado Appellate Court conventions, deadline arithmetic under C.R.C.P. 6 with C.R.S. § 24-11-101 holidays including Frances Xavier Cabrini Day and Juneteenth, hearings under the Cisco Webex statewide remote-appearance protocol, post-judgment under C.R.C.P. 59/60 and the C.R.S. § 13-54.5 garnishment regime) plus subject-matter bundles. Two subject-matter bundles ship: (1) co-consumer-debt covering FDCPA, Reg F, the Colorado Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (CFDCPA — C.R.S. art. 16 of title 5, recodified from Title 12 in 2022), the Colorado Consumer Protection Act (CCPA — C.R.S. art. 1 of title 6 with treble damages and mandatory fees), the Uniform Consumer Credit Code (UCCC — C.R.S. art. 1-9 of title 5), Colorado collection-agency licensure under the AG's Collection Agency Board, chain-of-title doctrine under Colorado UCC Article 9 (C.R.S. art. 9 of title 4), the 6-year SOL under C.R.S. § 13-80-103.5(1)(a), fact-pattern triage, and synthetic example filings; and (2) co-family-law covering the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act (UDMA — C.R.S. art. 10 of title 14), the 91-day residency and 91-day waiting-period requirements under C.R.S. § 14-10-106, dissolution / legal separation / declaration of invalidity (annulment) under C.R.S. § 14-10-111, the C.R.C.P. 16.2 mandatory financial-disclosure regime including the Sworn Financial Statement (JDF 1111), allocation of parental responsibilities under C.R.S. § 14-10-124 (replaces 'custody' terminology), the C.R.S. § 14-10-115 income-shares child-support guideline with the 93-overnight rule and statewide online worksheet (JDF 1820 E), maintenance under the C.R.S. § 14-10-114 guideline framework as amended in 2014 and 2024, common-law marriage under People v. Lucero and In re Marriage of Hogsett & Neale, and post-decree modification under C.R.S. § 14-10-122. All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.
Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notes for motion docket, and proposed orders for Washington courts across the full civil-practice surface. Applies GR 14 formatting; provides dedicated venue skills for King County District Court, King County Superior Court, Pierce County Superior Court (Tacoma), Snohomish County Superior Court (Everett), Spokane County Superior Court, the Superior Court Family Law Department (wa-family-court), and a roll-up for the rest of the state's most-populous counties. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (civil rules, evidence rules, fees and costs, local rules, citation format, online sources, discovery, first-30-days response, hearings, filing packets, post-judgment, fact-checking, deadlines, drafting scaffolders) plus six subject-matter bundles: wa-consumer-debt (FDCPA, Reg F, RCW 19.16, Washington CPA, chain of title), wa-family-law (Washington's community-property regime + RCW Title 26 dissolution / parenting / child support framework + the 2022 consolidated RCW 7.105 civil-protection-order regime), wa-landlord-tenant (RCW 59.18 RLTA + the 2019 SB 5600 statutorily-mandated-form pay-or-vacate notice + the 2021 SB 5160 just-cause framework + HB 1815 statewide tenant Right to Counsel + ERP), wa-personal-injury (RCW 4.22 pure-comparative-fault + several-liability post-1986 Reform Act + WPLA at RCW 7.72 + medical malpractice at RCW 7.70 + Notice of Tort Claim under RCW 4.92 / 4.96), wa-employment (Minimum Wage Act + WLAD at RCW 49.60 + PFML under RCW Title 50A + non-compete reform at RCW 49.62 + L&I-exclusive workers' comp at RCW 51), and wa-commercial-disputes (Washington CPA at RCW 19.86 with the Hangman Ridge 5-element test + WBCA at RCW 23B + LLC Act at RCW 25.15 + UCC at RCW 62A + MAR under RCW 7.06), plus matter-neutral wa-cpa (the general Consumer Protection Act / UDAP framework at RCW 19.86 — the five Hangman Ridge elements, the unfair-vs-deceptive Klem standard, the codified public-interest factors at RCW 19.86.093, per se pathways, treble damages capped at $25,000, and mandatory attorney fees — that the subject bundles compose with) and a focused wa-cema skill for the Commercial Electronic Mail Act (RCW 19.190) — Washington's anti-spam statute construed by Brown v. Old Navy (Wash. 2025) to bar any false or misleading commercial-email subject line, a per se Consumer Protection Act violation carrying $500 statutory damages. The plugin follows a **thin-skill architecture**: SKILL.md bodies describe procedural frameworks and point at the references corpus for current statutory text, dollar thresholds, day counts, and section subsections rather than embedding them. Reference corpora include 35 court-rule sets covering 1,233+ rules and 93 RCW chapters covering 3,266+ sections, plus the shared federal-debt-laws and ucc-model content via the claude-legal-federal-laws dependency. All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.
A Claude Code / Cowork marketplace of plugins for preparing U.S. court documents, organized one plugin per state plus a shared plugin for federal law.
NOT LEGAL ADVICE. These plugins are a drafting aid for self-represented litigants and the practitioners who help them. They produce document drafts and procedural information; they do not provide legal advice, do not select a legal strategy for any particular user, and do not create an attorney-client relationship. The user is the decision-maker on every choice — what motion to file, what defense to plead, what facts to swear to, whether to settle, whether to appeal. For complex matters, or matters with substantial sums at stake, consider consulting a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. Verify every rule, deadline, dollar threshold, and statutory citation against current law before filing.
Twelve plugins — ten state plugins plus two shared federal reference plugins. Each plugin's README.md is the canonical detail; this list links to them.
| Plugin | What it covers |
|---|---|
claude-legal-federal-laws | Canonical federal consumer-finance corpora (FDCPA / FCRA / TILA / ECOA / Reg B-Z, RESPA / SCRA / FHA / TSR), the Bankruptcy Code, and the model UCC — a dependency of every state plugin — plus a nationwide FCRA consumer credit-report-rights skills layer. |
claude-legal-immigration-laws | U.S. immigration law (INA / 8 CFR / 22 CFR / FAM mirrored verbatim + EOIR court rules), an on-demand case-law index (circuits / BIA / AAO), and an 11-skill venue-independent self-help layer. |
| Plugin | Coverage |
|---|---|
wa-court-docs | Washington — GR 14; 6 venues + 6 subject bundles + CPA + CEMA; 32 skills |
or-court-docs | Oregon — UTCR 2.010; Multnomah + Washington Co + roll-up; consumer-debt (no-interrogatories quirk) |
ca-court-docs | California — CRC 2.100-2.119; LASC + SFSC + roll-up; consumer-debt |
co-court-docs | Colorado — C.R.C.P. 10 + CJD 11-01; Denver + Arapahoe + roll-up; consumer-debt + family-law; 22 skills |
in-court-docs | Indiana — T.R. 5(E); Marion + Lake + roll-up; consumer-debt + family-law; 23 skills |
ny-court-docs | New York — 22 NYCRR § 202.5 / NYSCEF; 5 flagship Supreme Courts + District / City / Justice / Family / Housing courts; 5 subject bundles; 35 skills |
oh-court-docs | Ohio — Civ. R. 10; 8 Common Pleas venues + municipal + family (verbatim Cuyahoga + Delaware local rules); 5 subject bundles (consumer-debt + family-law + personal-injury + employment + commercial-disputes); 33 skills |
tn-court-docs | Tennessee — local-rule format; Circuit / Chancery / General Sessions; 4 subject bundles; 29 skills |
mi-court-docs | Michigan — MCR 1.109 / 2.113; Wayne + Oakland + 36th District + family; 6 subject bundles; 29 skills |
az-court-docs | Arizona — Ariz. R. Civ. P. 10 / 7.1; Maricopa + Pima + Justice + family; 6 subject bundles; 28 skills |
All state plugins are architected the same way: matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (statewide format, civil + evidence rules, fees, local rules, citation, discovery, first-30-days, hearings, filing, post-judgment, fact-check, deadlines) plus subject-matter bundles, sharing federal / UCC / Bankruptcy content via the claude-legal-federal-laws dependency rather than copying it per plugin. The marketplace is organized one plugin per state; more can be added under plugins/ as it grows.
Add this marketplace to Claude Code or Cowork, then install the state plugins you want:
/plugin marketplace add https://github.com/codearranger/claude-legal
/plugin install wa-court-docs@claude-legal
/plugin install or-court-docs@claude-legal
/plugin install ca-court-docs@claude-legal
/plugin install co-court-docs@claude-legal
/plugin install in-court-docs@claude-legal
/plugin install ny-court-docs@claude-legal
/plugin install oh-court-docs@claude-legal
/plugin install tn-court-docs@claude-legal
/plugin install mi-court-docs@claude-legal
/plugin install az-court-docs@claude-legal
Each state plugin declares claude-legal-federal-laws as a dependencies: entry, so the marketplace runtime installs the shared plugin automatically — no need to install it explicitly.