oh-court-docs

Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notices, and proposed orders for Indiana courts. Applies Indiana Trial Rule 5(E) statewide formatting; includes Marion Superior Court and Lake Superior Court specifics plus a county-courts roll-up; supports pro se workflows. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (Ind. Trial R. civil rules, Ind. Evid. R. evidence rules, fees and costs, local rules, citation format per the Indiana Citation Manual) plus subject-matter bundles. Two subject-matter bundles ship: in-consumer-debt (FDCPA / Reg F / IUCCC / DCSA / chain-of-title doctrine) and in-family-law (paternity at IC 31-14 — the JP case-type backbone, dissolution at IC 31-15 under Indiana's equitable-distribution regime, child support at IC 31-16 with the Indiana Child Support Guidelines court rule, custody and parenting time at IC 31-17 with the Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines court rule, adoption at IC 31-19, UCCJEA at IC 31-21, DCS / CHINS / TPR / delinquency at IC 31-25 / 31-30 / 31-32 / 31-34 / 31-35 / 31-37, protection orders at IC 34-26-5). The in-family-court venue skill covers Indiana's family-law topology — no separate Family Court trial court; large counties (Marion, Lake, Allen, Vanderburgh, Hamilton, St. Joseph) have dedicated Juvenile Divisions; smaller counties (like Bartholomew) consolidate family-law jurisdiction in the Circuit Court. Follows a thin-skill architecture: SKILL.md bodies describe procedural frameworks and point at the references corpus for current statutory text, dollar thresholds, day counts, and section subsections rather than embedding them. All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.

Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notices of motion, and proposed orders for California superior courts. Applies California Rules of Court 2.100-2.119 statewide formatting; includes Los Angeles Superior Court (LASC — Stanley Mosk Courthouse) and San Francisco Superior Court (SFSC — Civic Center Courthouse, Dept. 302 law-and-motion) specifics plus a county-courts roll-up for the most-populous counties (Orange, San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Santa Clara, Alameda, Sacramento, Contra Costa, Fresno, Kern); supports pro se ('In Pro Per') workflows. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (CCP civil rules with the 35-special-interrogatory cap and the 45-day jurisdictional motion-to-compel-further deadline, CEC evidence rules including § 1271 business-records foundation, fees and costs under CCP §§ 1032/1033.5 and § 1717 reciprocal attorney's fees, local rules for LASC + SFSC + populous counties, citation format per the California Style Manual, CRC 8.1115 unpublished-opinion rule, deadline arithmetic under CCP §§ 12/12a/12c with Govt. Code § 6700 holidays, hearings under the CRC 3.1308 tentative-ruling regime, the CCP § 1005(b) 16-court-day motion-notice framework, summary judgment under CCP § 437c) plus subject-matter bundles. The first subject-matter bundle, ca-consumer-debt, covers FDCPA / Reg F (federal), the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788-1788.33 — reaches both first-party and third-party collectors), the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788.50-1788.66 — heightened pleading + documentation for debt buyers), the California Debt Collection Licensing Act (Cal. Fin. Code §§ 100000-100027 — DFPI licensure since 2022), the Unfair Competition Law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200-17210), the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1750-1784), chain-of-title doctrine under Cal. Comm. Code Art. 9, fact-pattern triage, and synthetic example filings. All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.

Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notes for hearing, and proposed orders for Oregon circuit courts. Applies UTCR 2.010 statewide formatting; includes Multnomah County Circuit Court (Portland) and Washington County Circuit Court (Hillsboro) specifics plus a county-court roll-up for the other most-populous counties (Clackamas, Lane, Marion, Jackson, Deschutes, Linn, Benton, Yamhill, Polk, Douglas); supports pro se workflows. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (ORCP civil rules, OEC evidence rules, ORS 20 fees and costs, local SLR rules, citation format per the Oregon Appellate Courts Style Manual, online sources, discovery, first-30-days response, hearings, filing packets, post-judgment, fact-checking, deadlines under ORCP 10 + ORS 187.010 holidays) plus subject-matter bundles that plug into the procedural skills. The first subject-matter bundle, or-consumer-debt, covers FDCPA, Reg F, ORS 697 (Collection Agency Registration), the Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA, ORS 646.605 et seq.), chain-of-title doctrine, fact-pattern triage, and synthetic example filings for debt-buyer defense. The architecture leaves clean slots for future bundles (landlord-tenant under ORS 90, family, personal injury, etc.). All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.

Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notices, and proposed orders for Colorado courts. Applies C.R.C.P. 10 + Chief Justice Directive 11-01 statewide formatting (uniform 1-inch margins, double-spaced text, 12-point font, the two-block Colorado caption with the case-number / division / courtroom box); includes Denver District Court (2nd Judicial District) and Arapahoe County District Court (18th Judicial District) specifics plus a roll-up for the other most-populous counties (Jefferson, El Paso, Adams, Boulder, Larimer, Douglas, Weld, Pueblo, Mesa, Broomfield); supports pro se / self-represented workflows including CCEFS Pro Se and the JDF (Judicial Department Forms) catalog. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (C.R.C.P. civil rules with the 21-day answer window and C.R.C.P. 121 § 1-15 motion-practice timing, CRE evidence rules, fees and costs under C.R.S. art. 16 of title 13, local rules and Chief Justice Directives, citation format per the Colorado Appellate Court conventions, deadline arithmetic under C.R.C.P. 6 with C.R.S. § 24-11-101 holidays including Frances Xavier Cabrini Day and Juneteenth, hearings under the Cisco Webex statewide remote-appearance protocol, post-judgment under C.R.C.P. 59/60 and the C.R.S. § 13-54.5 garnishment regime) plus subject-matter bundles. Two subject-matter bundles ship: (1) co-consumer-debt covering FDCPA, Reg F, the Colorado Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (CFDCPA — C.R.S. art. 16 of title 5, recodified from Title 12 in 2022), the Colorado Consumer Protection Act (CCPA — C.R.S. art. 1 of title 6 with treble damages and mandatory fees), the Uniform Consumer Credit Code (UCCC — C.R.S. art. 1-9 of title 5), Colorado collection-agency licensure under the AG's Collection Agency Board, chain-of-title doctrine under Colorado UCC Article 9 (C.R.S. art. 9 of title 4), the 6-year SOL under C.R.S. § 13-80-103.5(1)(a), fact-pattern triage, and synthetic example filings; and (2) co-family-law covering the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act (UDMA — C.R.S. art. 10 of title 14), the 91-day residency and 91-day waiting-period requirements under C.R.S. § 14-10-106, dissolution / legal separation / declaration of invalidity (annulment) under C.R.S. § 14-10-111, the C.R.C.P. 16.2 mandatory financial-disclosure regime including the Sworn Financial Statement (JDF 1111), allocation of parental responsibilities under C.R.S. § 14-10-124 (replaces 'custody' terminology), the C.R.S. § 14-10-115 income-shares child-support guideline with the 93-overnight rule and statewide online worksheet (JDF 1820 E), maintenance under the C.R.S. § 14-10-114 guideline framework as amended in 2014 and 2024, common-law marriage under People v. Lucero and In re Marriage of Hogsett & Neale, and post-decree modification under C.R.S. § 14-10-122. All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.

Draft and format pleadings, declarations, motions, notes for motion docket, and proposed orders for Washington courts across the full civil-practice surface. Applies GR 14 formatting; provides dedicated venue skills for King County District Court, King County Superior Court, Pierce County Superior Court (Tacoma), Snohomish County Superior Court (Everett), Spokane County Superior Court, the Superior Court Family Law Department (wa-family-court), and a roll-up for the rest of the state's most-populous counties. Architected as matter-neutral civil-procedure skills (civil rules, evidence rules, fees and costs, local rules, citation format, online sources, discovery, first-30-days response, hearings, filing packets, post-judgment, fact-checking, deadlines, drafting scaffolders) plus six subject-matter bundles: wa-consumer-debt (FDCPA, Reg F, RCW 19.16, Washington CPA, chain of title), wa-family-law (Washington's community-property regime + RCW Title 26 dissolution / parenting / child support framework + the 2022 consolidated RCW 7.105 civil-protection-order regime), wa-landlord-tenant (RCW 59.18 RLTA + the 2019 SB 5600 statutorily-mandated-form pay-or-vacate notice + the 2021 SB 5160 just-cause framework + HB 1815 statewide tenant Right to Counsel + ERP), wa-personal-injury (RCW 4.22 pure-comparative-fault + several-liability post-1986 Reform Act + WPLA at RCW 7.72 + medical malpractice at RCW 7.70 + Notice of Tort Claim under RCW 4.92 / 4.96), wa-employment (Minimum Wage Act + WLAD at RCW 49.60 + PFML under RCW Title 50A + non-compete reform at RCW 49.62 + L&I-exclusive workers' comp at RCW 51), and wa-commercial-disputes (Washington CPA at RCW 19.86 with the Hangman Ridge 5-element test + WBCA at RCW 23B + LLC Act at RCW 25.15 + UCC at RCW 62A + MAR under RCW 7.06), plus matter-neutral wa-cpa (the general Consumer Protection Act / UDAP framework at RCW 19.86 — the five Hangman Ridge elements, the unfair-vs-deceptive Klem standard, the codified public-interest factors at RCW 19.86.093, per se pathways, treble damages capped at $25,000, and mandatory attorney fees — that the subject bundles compose with) and a focused wa-cema skill for the Commercial Electronic Mail Act (RCW 19.190) — Washington's anti-spam statute construed by Brown v. Old Navy (Wash. 2025) to bar any false or misleading commercial-email subject line, a per se Consumer Protection Act violation carrying $500 statutory damages. The plugin follows a **thin-skill architecture**: SKILL.md bodies describe procedural frameworks and point at the references corpus for current statutory text, dollar thresholds, day counts, and section subsections rather than embedding them. Reference corpora include 35 court-rule sets covering 1,233+ rules and 93 RCW chapters covering 3,266+ sections, plus the shared federal-debt-laws and ucc-model content via the claude-legal-federal-laws dependency. All workflows are skills (no slash commands) so the agent invokes them automatically from natural-language requests.