From nw
Assigns reputation tiers to sources, cross-references claims for verification, detects biases, and standardizes citations with metadata.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/nw:nw-source-verificationThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Validate every source against the trusted source domains provided via prompt context.
Validate every source against the trusted source domains provided via prompt context.
| Tier | Score | Examples | Verification |
|---|---|---|---|
| High | 1.0 | Academic (.edu, arxiv.org, ieee.org), Official (.gov, w3.org, ietf.org), Tech docs (developer.mozilla.org), OSS foundations (apache.org, cncf.io) | Standard citation |
| Medium-High | 0.8 | Industry leaders (martinfowler.com, stackoverflow.com, infoq.com) | Cross-ref with 1+ high-tier |
| Medium | 0.6 | Community (medium.com verified experts, dev.to, hashnode.com) | Author verification + 3-source cross-ref |
| Excluded | 0.0 | Unverified blogs (*.blogspot.com, wordpress.com), quora.com, pastebin.com | Reject, log warning, find alternative |
Evaluate before citing:
When bias detected: note in Source Analysis, reduce confidence.
[1] {Author/Organization}. "{Title}". {Publication/Website}. {Date}. {Full URL}. Accessed {YYYY-MM-DD}.
Source URL | Domain | Access date | Reputation score (from tiers) | Verification status
Mark "[Paywalled]"/"[Restricted Access]" | Provide URL | Find open-access alternative | Note in Knowledge Gaps
npx claudepluginhub nwave-ai/nwave --plugin nwEvaluates source credibility using T1-T6 tiers and CRAAP framework. Assesses search results, GitHub repos, software packages, tools, and detects SEO spam/content farms.
Triangulates claims by tracing provenance, assessing source independence, and grading confidence. Use when verifying stats or checking if a claim is actually true.
Evaluate sources using CRAAP test, classify reliability tiers, build annotated bibliographies, and curate research references.