Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From itropa
This skill provides the analytical frameworks for extracting transferable mechanisms from future industries. Used by Phase 5 of `/itropa:go`, or conversationally when the user asks to extract mechanisms from an industry.
npx claudepluginhub joncik91/itropa-pluginHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/itropa:mechanism-analysisThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
This skill provides the analytical frameworks for extracting transferable mechanisms from future industries. Used by Phase 5 of `/itropa:go`, or conversationally when the user asks to extract mechanisms from an industry.
Converts business complexity into actionable clarity via structural thinking and systems analysis. Use for market dynamics, strategic diagnosis, leverage points, and executive insights.
Applies hypothesis-driven MECE problem solving and strategic frameworks (Five Forces, PESTLE, SWOT, Ansoff) to structure complex problems, build issue trees, develop hypotheses, and design analytical workplans.
Facilitates analogical transfer sessions: abstracts problem structure, maps to distant domains like biology or history, transfers operating principles. Supports --brief, --tetralemma, --polarity modes for creative problem-solving.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
This skill provides the analytical frameworks for extracting transferable mechanisms from future industries. Used by Phase 5 of /itropa:go, or conversationally when the user asks to extract mechanisms from an industry.
Activate when performing mechanism extraction analysis on an industry expression.
For each industry, run ALL 5 frameworks to produce a comprehensive mechanism analysis.
Analyze the industry by breaking it down into 3-5 core functions/principles. Focus on WHAT it does and WHY each function is essential.
Output structure:
{
"analysisType": "functional",
"coreMechanism": "Primary mechanism in 1 sentence",
"abstractPattern": "Highest-level pattern abstracted from this mechanism",
"keyPrinciples": [
{"principle": "Core principle", "function": "What it does", "criticality": "Why it's essential"}
],
"historicalApplications": [
{"domain": "Field", "example": "Concrete example", "era": "Period", "successFactors": "Why it worked", "limitations": "Why it couldn't expand", "evolutionPath": "How it developed"}
],
"untappedDomains": [
{"domain": "Unexplored field", "opportunity": "How to apply", "novelty": "What's new", "transferBarriers": "What makes it hard", "requiredAdaptations": "What must change", "impactPotential": "high|medium|low"}
],
"combinationPotential": ["Compatible mechanism 1", "Compatible mechanism 2"],
"transferPotential": 75,
"abstractionLevel": "high|medium|low",
"maturityScore": 80,
"complexityRating": "high|medium|low",
"universality": "broad|moderate|narrow",
"disruptionPotential": "high|medium|low"
}
Identify 3-5 key components, relationships, and flows. Focus on HOW elements interact.
Output structure:
{
"analysisType": "structural",
"coreMechanism": "Primary mechanism in 1 sentence",
"abstractPattern": "Structural pattern at highest abstraction",
"structuralElements": [
{"element": "Component", "role": "Its function", "interactions": "How it connects to others"}
],
"historicalApplications": [
{"domain": "Field", "example": "Example", "era": "Period", "successFactors": "Why structure worked", "limitations": "Structural weaknesses", "evolutionPath": "How structure evolved"}
],
"untappedDomains": [
{"domain": "Field", "opportunity": "How structure applies", "novelty": "Unique structural insight", "transferBarriers": "Structural incompatibilities", "requiredAdaptations": "How to adapt structure", "impactPotential": "high|medium|low"}
],
"combinationPotential": ["Complementary structure 1"],
"transferPotential": 70,
"abstractionLevel": "medium",
"maturityScore": 75,
"complexityRating": "medium",
"universality": "moderate",
"disruptionPotential": "medium"
}
Map cause-effect sequence from input to output. Identify critical intervention points.
Output structure:
{
"analysisType": "causal",
"coreMechanism": "Primary mechanism in 1 sentence",
"abstractPattern": "Causal pattern at highest abstraction",
"causalChain": {
"trigger": "What initiates the process",
"sequence": ["Step 1: cause → effect", "Step 2: cause → effect"],
"outcome": "Final result",
"interventionPoints": ["Where to intervene 1", "Where to intervene 2"]
},
"historicalApplications": [
{"domain": "Field", "example": "Example", "era": "Period", "successFactors": "Why chain worked", "limitations": "Where chain broke", "evolutionPath": "How chain was refined"}
],
"untappedDomains": [
{"domain": "Field", "opportunity": "How causal chain applies", "novelty": "New causal insight", "transferBarriers": "What breaks chain", "requiredAdaptations": "How to maintain causality", "impactPotential": "high|medium|low"}
],
"combinationPotential": ["Sequential mechanism 1"],
"transferPotential": 65,
"abstractionLevel": "medium",
"maturityScore": 70,
"complexityRating": "high",
"universality": "moderate",
"disruptionPotential": "medium"
}
Identify what limitations/constraints actually ENABLE new opportunities (the judo principle — using limitations as leverage).
Output structure:
{
"analysisType": "constraint-opportunity",
"coreMechanism": "Primary mechanism in 1 sentence",
"abstractPattern": "Constraint-opportunity pattern at highest abstraction",
"constraintOpportunities": [
{"constraint": "Limitation", "opportunity": "What it enables", "application": "How to exploit this"}
],
"historicalApplications": [
{"domain": "Field", "example": "Example", "era": "Period", "successFactors": "Which constraints enabled success", "limitations": "Constraints not overcome", "evolutionPath": "How constraints were leveraged"}
],
"untappedDomains": [
{"domain": "Field", "opportunity": "How constraints create opportunity", "novelty": "Unexpected leverage", "transferBarriers": "Missing constraints", "requiredAdaptations": "How to create/use constraints", "impactPotential": "high|medium|low"}
],
"combinationPotential": ["Constraint-based mechanism 1"],
"transferPotential": 60,
"abstractionLevel": "high",
"maturityScore": 65,
"complexityRating": "high",
"universality": "narrow",
"disruptionPotential": "high"
}
Explain how the mechanism behaves at micro/meso/macro scales and across different contexts.
Output structure:
{
"analysisType": "scale-context",
"coreMechanism": "Primary mechanism in 1 sentence",
"abstractPattern": "Scale-invariant pattern at highest abstraction",
"scaleContextInsights": {
"microScale": "How mechanism works at individual/small scale",
"mesoScale": "How mechanism works at organizational/medium scale",
"macroScale": "How mechanism works at industry/large scale",
"contextVariations": ["Variation 1", "Variation 2", "Variation 3"]
},
"historicalApplications": [
{"domain": "Field", "example": "Example", "era": "Period", "successFactors": "Which scale/context worked", "limitations": "Scale/context boundaries", "evolutionPath": "How it scaled"}
],
"untappedDomains": [
{"domain": "Field", "opportunity": "How to apply at different scale/context", "novelty": "New scale insight", "transferBarriers": "Scale incompatibilities", "requiredAdaptations": "How to adapt to new scale", "impactPotential": "high|medium|low"}
],
"combinationPotential": ["Scale-complementary mechanism 1"],
"transferPotential": 80,
"abstractionLevel": "high",
"maturityScore": 85,
"complexityRating": "low",
"universality": "broad",
"disruptionPotential": "high"
}