Applies hypothesis-driven MECE problem solving and strategic frameworks (Five Forces, PESTLE, SWOT, Ansoff) to structure complex problems, build issue trees, develop hypotheses, and design analytical workplans.
npx claudepluginhub anotb/management-consulting-pluginThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Apply hypothesis-driven methodology and established strategic frameworks to structure complex problems, develop testable hypotheses, and guide systematic analysis to actionable recommendations. Select appropriate frameworks based on the problem, apply them rigorously with substantive reasoning, and synthesize insights across multiple lenses.
Generates SWOT, PESTLE, and Porter's Five Forces analyses with Mermaid diagrams for competitive positioning and strategic planning.
Provides McKinsey-style structured strategic analysis using MECE, SWOT, VRIO, and other frameworks for complex business problems.
Develops business strategies via competitive and market analysis using frameworks like Porter's 5 Forces, SWOT, Good Strategy kernel. For market entry, product launches, M&A, or strategic decisions.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Apply hypothesis-driven methodology and established strategic frameworks to structure complex problems, develop testable hypotheses, and guide systematic analysis to actionable recommendations. Select appropriate frameworks based on the problem, apply them rigorously with substantive reasoning, and synthesize insights across multiple lenses.
Before any analysis, rigorously define the problem. Get outcome clarity and constraints upfront.
A good problem definition covers:
Problem framing techniques to sharpen the definition:
Key questions to pressure-test the definition:
Apply MECE decomposition (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) to break the problem into non-overlapping, complete branches.
Common problem structures:
| Problem Type | Recommended Structure |
|---|---|
| Profitability decline | Revenue (price x volume) + Cost structure |
| Market entry | Market size x Achievable share + Entry requirements |
| Operational inefficiency | Throughput x Yield + Cycle time |
| Customer churn | Acquisition x Retention x Lifetime value |
| Growth strategy | Core business + Adjacent opportunities + Transformational bets |
| Digital transformation | Current state + Capability gaps + Technology options |
MECE in practice:
NOT MECE (overlapping):
MECE:
NOT MECE (inconsistent categories):
MECE:
For digital businesses, consider alternative MECE cuts:
Not all branches deserve equal attention. Use value-effort analysis combined with hypothesis importance:
Decision criteria:
Form testable hypotheses early. This focuses fact-finding and prevents boiling-the-ocean data collection.
A good hypothesis:
For each hypothesis, define:
Structure analysis to test hypotheses, not to generate data for its own sake.
For each analysis workstream, define:
Analytical approaches by situation:
| Situation | Recommended Analysis |
|---|---|
| Profit driver identification | Bridge analysis, variance analysis |
| Market sizing | Top-down, bottom-up, triangulated |
| Competitive assessment | Relative positioning, scenario analysis |
| Financial projections | Scenario modeling, sensitivity analysis |
| Process optimization | Time studies, root cause analysis, process mining |
| Customer insights | Segmentation, journey mapping, behavioral analysis |
Draw conclusions that answer the original question. Synthesis is not summary. It follows the structure:
Translate findings into action. Each recommendation needs:
[Ultimate Question]
+---------------+---------------+
v v v
[Hypothesis 1] [Hypothesis 2] [Hypothesis 3]
| | |
+----+----+ +----+----+ +----+----+
v v v v v v
[Proof 1] [Proof 2] [Proof 1] [Proof 2] [Proof 1] [Proof 2]
| | |
[Quick Test] [Quick Test] [Quick Test]
Start with the ultimate question. Branch into competing hypotheses. Under each hypothesis, identify the proof points needed and the quickest way to test them.
[Problem Statement]
+---------------+---------------+
v v v
[Driver A] [Driver B] [Driver C]
| |
+----+----+ +----+----+
v v v v
[Factor 1] [Factor 2] [Factor 3] [Factor 4]
| |
[Root Cause] [Root Cause]
Decompose the problem into its causal drivers. Keep branching until you reach actionable root causes.
| Pitfall | Why It's Problematic | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Defining the problem too broadly | Diffuses analysis | Narrow scope iteratively |
| Jumping to solutions | Misses root causes | Follow the process |
| Collecting all data | Wastes time | Prioritize by hypothesis |
| Confirming existing beliefs | Biases analysis | Actively seek disconfirming evidence |
| Presenting findings without recommendations | Leaves client without action | Always translate to action |
| Over-complicating the analysis | Delays insights | Apply 80/20 principle |
| Question | Primary Framework | Complementary Pairing |
|---|---|---|
| How attractive is our industry? | Five Forces Analysis | PESTLE, Value Chain |
| How should we compete? | Competitive Positioning | Strategy Canvas, VRIO |
| How is our organization aligned? | 7S Framework | Balanced Scorecard |
| What is our competitive advantage? | VRIO | Value Chain, Five Forces |
| How should we grow? | Ansoff Matrix | Growth-Share Matrix, Three Horizons |
| What external factors affect us? | PESTLE | Five Forces, SWOT |
| What are our strengths and weaknesses? | SWOT Analysis | PESTLE (external), VRIO (internal) |
| How should we enter a new market? | Market Entry Framework | Five Forces, PESTLE |
| What is our business model? | Business Model Canvas | Value Chain, Platform Strategy |
| How do we create value? | Value Chain | Business Model Canvas, Competitive Positioning |
| How do we measure performance? | Balanced Scorecard | 7S Framework |
| How should we allocate resources? | Growth-Share Matrix | Nine-Box, Three Horizons |
| What are our strategic options? | Strategy Canvas | Three Horizons, Ansoff Matrix |
| How do we build a platform? | Platform Strategy | Business Model Canvas, Five Forces |
Purpose: Assess industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
For each of the five forces (New Entrants, Buyer Power, Supplier Power, Substitutes, Competitive Rivalry):
Purpose: Analyze external macro-environmental factors.
For each dimension (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, Environmental):
Purpose: Assess strategic position through internal strengths/weaknesses and external opportunities/threats.
Create four tables (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) with columns: Factor | Evidence | Strategic Significance (H/M/L). Include 3-5 factors per quadrant, grounded in evidence rather than generic claims. After the four quadrants, generate a Cross-Quadrant Strategy Matrix:
Conclude with the 2-3 highest-priority strategic actions.
Purpose: Assess organizational alignment and capability.
Create two summary tables:
For each of the 7 elements, provide 2-3 current-state observations and key gaps identified.
Conclude with:
Purpose: Assess competitive advantage and resource sustainability.
Create a VRIO table with columns: Resource/Capability | Valuable? | Rare? | Costly to Imitate? | Organized to Capture? | Competitive Implication.
Map implications:
Conclude with which resources provide sustained advantage, which need development, and what the imitation barriers are.
Purpose: Translate strategy into measurable objectives across four perspectives.
For each perspective (Financial, Customer, Internal Process, Learning & Growth), create a table with columns: Objective | Measure | Target | Initiative | Status. Include 3-4 objectives per perspective. Ensure objectives cascade logically: Learning & Growth capabilities enable Internal Process excellence, which drives Customer outcomes, which deliver Financial results.
Conclude with a Strategy Map narrative showing cause-effect linkages and identifying any broken links in the strategy logic.
Purpose: Analyze business portfolio and resource allocation.
Create a portfolio table with columns: Business Unit | Market Growth Rate (%) | Relative Market Share | Quadrant (Star/Question Mark/Cash Cow/Dog) | Strategy (Invest/Hold/Harvest/Divest).
Conclude with Portfolio Implications (cash flow dynamics, investment requirements, rebalancing needs) and 3-4 prioritized recommendations.
Purpose: Analyze growth strategies across four paths.
Start with the current position (products, markets, revenue). Then create a summary table with columns: Strategy | Risk Level | Opportunity | Key Consideration.
For each of the four strategies (Market Penetration, Product Development, Market Development, Diversification), assess: approach, opportunity size, risk level, and investment required.
Conclude with Recommended Strategy: primary choice with rationale, secondary option, and investment requirements.
Purpose: Multi-business portfolio prioritization.
Plot business units on a 3x3 matrix (Market Attractiveness vs. Competitive Position). Create a table with columns: Business Unit | Market Attractiveness (H/M/L) | Competitive Position (H/M/L) | Strategy (Invest/Select/Harvest/Divest). Conclude with investment allocation implications.
Purpose: Balance short-term and long-term growth.
For each horizon, create an initiative table:
Conclude with Investment Allocation (% split across horizons) and Key Risks per horizon.
Purpose: Define competitive positioning.
Assess current position across three dimensions (Target Scope, Cost Advantage, Differentiation). Then evaluate each generic strategy (Cost Leadership, Differentiation, Focus) covering: suitability conditions, required capabilities, and key risks.
Conclude with Recommended Strategy: chosen position, rationale, how to achieve, and how to defend.
Purpose: Visualize competitive differentiation by comparing value curves across key factors.
Identify 6-10 factors the industry competes on (price, quality, features, service, brand, convenience, etc.). Create a table with columns: Competing Factor | Our Company (1-5) | Competitor A (1-5) | Competitor B (1-5) | Industry Average (1-5).
Identify where your curve diverges from competitors (differentiation) and where it converges (parity). Apply blue ocean logic: which factors can be eliminated, reduced, raised, or created?
Conclude with Differentiation Assessment and a recommended Target Value Curve.
Purpose: Understand how value is created in the business.
Create two tables:
Conclude with Value Chain Linkages (how activities reinforce each other), Cost Analysis, and Differentiation Sources.
Purpose: Map and evaluate the complete business model.
Analyze all nine building blocks in a table with columns: Block | Current State | Strengths | Vulnerabilities. The blocks: Customer Segments, Value Propositions, Channels, Customer Relationships, Revenue Streams, Key Resources, Key Activities, Key Partnerships, Cost Structure.
Assess how the blocks reinforce each other. Conclude with:
Purpose: Evaluate and select market entry strategies for new geographies or segments.
Assess market attractiveness in a table with columns: Factor | Assessment | Data Source | Implication (covering market size, growth rate, competitive intensity, regulatory barriers, cultural factors).
Evaluate entry modes (organic build, acquisition, joint venture, partnership, licensing, export) in a table with columns: Entry Mode | Investment Required | Risk Level | Speed to Market | Control Level | Recommendation.
Conclude with Recommended Entry Strategy, sequencing, and key success factors.
Purpose: Assess and design platform-based business models.
Identify the platform type (marketplace, innovation platform, social platform, hybrid). Map the ecosystem with columns: Participant Type | Role | Value Created | Value Captured | Incentive to Join.
Assess network effects (same-side, cross-side, data) and their strength. Evaluate platform economics: subsidized side vs. monetized side, multi-homing risk, winner-takes-all dynamics.
Conclude with Platform Design (governance, openness, monetization), Growth Strategy (solving chicken-and-egg, building liquidity), and Defensibility.
When conducting market analysis, structure the work in layers:
The synthesis is where the real consulting value lies. Individual frameworks provide structure, but the connections between them drive insight.
When analyzing a complex situation with multiple frameworks, structure the synthesis as:
External Landscape
Internal Position
Growth Options
Cross-Framework Synthesis
Implementation Priorities