From misq-skills
Plans MIS Quarterly revisions and drafts point-by-point response letters, prioritizing the Senior Editor's letter and addressing tradition-specific rigor concerns.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/misq-skills:misq-rebuttalThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- You received a major/minor revision (or a reject-and-resubmit) from MISQ
Do not draft the response letter before the manuscript is actually revised. The response is a map to real changes, not a promise of them. For each point, the revision in the manuscript comes first; the letter then points to where and how.
The Senior Editor owns the decision, so the SE's letter sets priorities. Build a triage table: SE-elevated concerns first, then AE and reviewer points, flagging where reviewers conflict. Resolve conflicts in the direction the SE signaled, and say so explicitly when you do.
| Concern raised | A persuasive MISQ response... |
|---|---|
| Behavioral validity / common-method bias | Adds procedural evidence, a marker/method-factor test, or shows interactions survive — not just a Harman test |
| Economics identification | Adds placebo/event-study evidence, alternative specifications, sensitivity to the key assumption |
| Design science evaluation | Adds baselines, ablations, or a field/expert evaluation tying results to design propositions |
| Qualitative trustworthiness | Strengthens the data structure, audit trail, and representative evidence |
Reviewers often probe replicability. Update the genre-appropriate transparency package — design/data/analysis documentation plus procedures and/or code sufficient for replication — and note in the letter what you added. Where badges or the AIS Transactions on Replication Research collaboration apply, mention them.
Adding analyses and clarifications grows the manuscript, but the page limit still counts everything and over-length revisions are returned. Offsetting cuts (tighter framing, consolidated exhibits) are part of the revision, not an afterthought — and supplementary materials remain discouraged.
【Decision being answered】major / minor / reject-and-resubmit
【SE-first triage】ranked changes made
【Rigor responses】behavioral / economics / design science / qualitative evidence added
【Transparency update】procedures/code refreshed: yes
【Length & anonymity】within limit; anonymized: yes
【Response letter】point-by-point, cross-referenced: ready
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin misq-skillsPlans and drafts point-by-point response letters for JMIS major/minor revisions, triaging referee concerns and prioritizing AE guidance.
Drafts point-by-point response letters for Administrative Science Quarterly R&R submissions after manuscript revisions are complete. Structures cover notes, reviewer comment handling, and summaries of major changes.
Drafts a point-by-point response and revision plan for a Management Science R&R, prioritizing the Department Editor's binding concerns and preserving double-anonymization.