From asq-skills
Drafts point-by-point response letters for Administrative Science Quarterly R&R submissions after manuscript revisions are complete. Structures cover notes, reviewer comment handling, and summaries of major changes.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/asq-skills:asq-rebuttalThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- You have an ASQ R&R and have **already revised** the manuscript
Revise the paper first. The response letter documents changes you made; it is not a substitute for making them. If you have not revised yet, return to the relevant asq-* skill.
ASQ's review is developmental — treat reviewers as collaborators who took the idea seriously. The winning posture is gracious, responsive, and intellectually serious: accommodate where they are right, and where you disagree, argue with evidence and respect rather than dismissal. The central question the handling editor (under Editor Beth Bechky, term began July 1, 2025) and reviewers will ask is "did the idea mature?" — consistent with ASQ's emphasis on curating papers that will endure. Foreground how the contribution got deeper, not just which boxes you ticked. A response letter that reads as a checklist of mechanical robustness additions — adequate at some quantitative-leaning journals — will underperform here if the theoretical insight has not sharpened.
【Round】1st / 2nd / later
【Editor's core ask addressed】how + where
【Comments handled】N / N (none skipped)
【Disagreements】[...] + evidence/compromise
【Contribution deepened】how the idea matured
【Consistency check】no cross-reviewer contradictions
【Next step】resubmit via the editorial system
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin asq-skillsStructures a response letter for an American Sociological Review revise-and-resubmit. Handles cross-method reviewer conflicts and protects the paper's contribution.
Plans revisions and drafts a point-by-point response letter for Organization Science R&R, following journal norms: verbatim italic quoting, no duplicated responses, non-combative tone, prioritizing the senior editor.
Structures the response letter for an American Educational Research Journal revise-and-resubmit, addressing editor and reviewer comments while protecting the paper's contribution.