From car-skills
Drafts a point-by-point response for CAR revise-and-resubmit, including revision planning, new analyses, robustness, and code-sharing updates.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/car-skills:car-rebuttalThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- You received a CAR revise-and-resubmit and must plan revisions and the response
Every new or changed result needs a reproducibility row:
| Revision item | Table / figure | Code or data change | Disclosure update |
|---|---|---|---|
| New robustness or alternative measure | Main or online appendix table | Script name, variable definition, sample restriction | Data availability / repository note |
| New experiment or archival sample | Study/table number | Instrument, randomization, or sample construction file | Ethics, data, and retention note |
| Revised construct or proxy | Hypothesis/table location | Renamed variable and transformation log | Construct/proxy explanation |
| AI-assisted text/code cleanup | Methods or disclosure note | Tool use and human verification | AI disclosure if required |
Do not resubmit until a fresh clone of the repository or analysis folder regenerates all changed exhibits. CAR's data-integrity expectations make stale replication files a substantive defect, not an administrative detail.
【Concordance】R1 / R2 / subject Editor points → actions ...
【Priority】editor's first-order items addressed first?
【New work】tests/experiments/robustness done & reproducible?
【Response letter】each comment quoted, answered, located?
【CAR materials】data availability statement, code repo, AI & overlap disclosures updated?
【Reproducibility ledger】changed exhibits regenerate from clean run?
【Next step】car-submission (final preflight) → resubmit in Editorial Manager
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin car-skillsPlans revision and drafts point-by-point response for JAR revise-and-resubmit. Triage referee concerns, prioritize editor's first-order issues (identification, channel, measurement), update data-and-code package.
Drafts point-by-point response letters for The Accounting Review R&R submissions, addressing identification, contribution, and data-authenticity demands.
Drafts response-to-referees letters and revision plans for REStat decision letters. Structures point-by-point replies, triages comments, and flags identification/measurement objections.