From car-skills
Positions a CAR manuscript within the accounting literature by identifying the conversation it joins, distinguishing it from related work, and disclosing overlap with the authors' own papers.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/car-skills:car-literature-positioningThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- The intro reads as gap-spotting ("no paper has examined…") rather than joining a debate
CAR papers earn their place by advancing a live accounting conversation — for example, on disclosure and information asymmetry, earnings quality and the properties of accounting numbers, auditor judgment and audit quality, the real effects of reporting, tax avoidance and incentives, or governance and accounting information. Identify the two or three streams your paper speaks to and the specific finding or assumption you confirm, qualify, extend, or overturn. Because CAR is method-agnostic, position against the substance of the prior work, not its method: an experiment can sharpen the mechanism behind an archival association, and an analytical model can rationalize a documented empirical regularity. Make that cross-tradition relationship explicit — it is a recurring CAR strength.
CAR's signed author declaration includes an overlap-disclosure rule: if your submission shares substantial data, sites, materials, participants, or modeling analysis with any other paper of yours (published or not), you must disclose and discuss the overlap and provide a copy of the other work if it is not public. Position your contribution so the boundary between this paper and your related papers is unmistakable — both for the editor and in the manuscript's framing.
Use this as a second-pass capability check. First lock the accounting construct, setting, identification or theory, and disclosure/market/organizational implication; then test whether the manuscript addresses accounting reviewers who expect accounting-specific constructs, credible design, and contribution to reporting, auditing, tax, or governance debates.
claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.resources/official-source-map.md for volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.【Conversations】streams this paper joins ...
【Nearest neighbors】papers + one-line differentiation each ...
【Accounting locus】why this is accounting, not pure finance/econ ...
【Own-work overlap】disclosed? what differs? ...
【Next step】car-contribution-framing
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin car-skillsPositions a JAR manuscript within the accounting literature by naming the specific conversation, stating the marginal contribution over prior work, and justifying the venue.
Positions a TAR manuscript inside a live accounting conversation by problematizing tensions in the closest literature, rather than gap-spotting or incremental database extensions.
Frames results as an explicit contribution for a Contemporary Accounting Research manuscript, adapting to archival, experimental, or analytical traditions.