From car-skills
Explains CAR's double-anonymous, two-reviewer review process, decision-letter signals, and formal appeals rules. Use before submitting or after receiving a decision.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/car-skills:car-review-processThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- Before submitting, to calibrate expectations for CAR's process and timeline
CAR has a formal appeals process with a built-in one-month waiting period, a six-month deadline, and a new submission fee required to appeal. Appeal only with a substantive, specific basis (a clear factual error or misreading), not general disagreement.
【Decision type】desk reject / reject / R&R / conditional accept ...
【Decider】subject Editor disposition; EIC approves acceptance
【First-order concerns】(from the Editor's letter) ...
【Reviewer themes】R1 vs. R2; conflicts ...
【Appeal?】basis / one-month wait / six-month deadline / new fee ...
【Next step】car-rebuttal (on R&R)
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin car-skillsExplains the JAR review process: editor-panel structure, double-anonymized review, fee gate, desk-rejection risk, and the conference/Registered Reports tracks. Use when reading a decision letter or preparing a submission.
Explains TAR's tiered editor structure, double-blind two-reviewer model, decision types (desk reject, reject, R&R), and post-publication integrity rules. Use when reading a TAR decision letter or setting expectations.
Explains the Journal of Accounting and Economics review process: editor screening, double-anonymized review, decision letters, and the JAE Conference pipeline.