Engage in historically-grounded philosophical dialogues with AI personas of thinkers like Nietzsche, Hadot, and Kusanagi, using formats such as socratic, dialectic, or symposium. Invoke single-philosopher role-plays or orchestrate multi-philosopher encounters with source attribution, period awareness, and meta-cognition.
Create a new philosopher persona from a historical thinker or figure. Use when: /create <name>, add philosopher, new persona, create thinker skill, historical figure dialogue.
Multi-philosopher dialogue. Use when: /dialogue, philosopher debate, cross-time philosophical discussion, Nietzsche vs Hadot, philosophers talking to each other, philosophical encounter.
Autonomous multi-philosopher dialogue with separate agents per voice. Use when: /encounter, autonomous dialogue, philosopher encounter, run philosophers, let philosophers talk.
Pierre Hadot philosophical dialogue. Use when: /hadot, talk to Hadot, philosophy as way of life, spiritual exercises, ancient philosophy as practice, Stoic practice, Hadot persona.
Major Motoko Kusanagi philosophical dialogue. Use when: /kusanagi, talk to Kusanagi, Ghost in the Shell philosophy, consciousness and identity, AI persona, cyberpunk philosophy, mind-body problem, posthuman questions.
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Based on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Praxis (πρᾶξις) = practice. Knowledge enacted, not just known.
⚠️ Live experiment. My cognitive toolkit — fork it, adapt it to your brain.
A cognitive discipline for human-AI collaboration built on mutual sharpening — the human sets intent and directs, the AI challenges and reveals blind spots, and both learn from the loop.
AI tools are powerful but chaotic. Most people either micromanage every prompt or let AI run wild and pray. Neither scales to real work.
This toolkit treats AI collaboration as cognitive discipline — a set of thinking modes you activate depending on the situation, where the AI also pushes back on your assumptions. The goal is not to make AI do more. It's to think better together — and that includes letting AI challenge the human.
Deeper why → PHILOSOPHY.md
flowchart LR
F["🧭 Frame"] --> T["🧠 Think"]
T --> B["⚙️ Build"]
B --> D["🔧 Debug"]
D --> L["🪞 Learn"]
L -.->|"compounding loop"| F
classDef frame fill:#E8EAF6,stroke:#3F51B5,color:#000
classDef think fill:#E1BEE7,stroke:#7B1FA2,color:#000
classDef build fill:#C8E6C9,stroke:#388E3C,color:#000
classDef debug fill:#FFE0B2,stroke:#F57C00,color:#000
classDef learn fill:#BBDEFB,stroke:#1976D2,color:#000
class F frame
class T think
class B build
class D debug
class L learn
| Mode | What | Hero Skills |
|---|---|---|
| 🧭 Frame | Classify the problem → route to the right skill chain | /frame-problem (Cynefin), /pick-model |
| 🧠 Think | Divergent ideation, deep analysis, adversarial review | /brainstorm (SCAMPER), /investigate, /probe, /challenge |
| ⚙️ Build | Plan → develop → gate → test → sync | /openspec-* suite (9 skills, human-gated sections) |
| 🔧 Debug | Search-first troubleshooting with learnings DB | /troubleshoot (Wolf Fence, 5 Whys, OODA), /experiment |
| 🪞 Learn | Extract patterns, persist sessions | /retrospect-*, /save-context, /load-context |
Plus: tool creation (/edit-tool), conversions (PDF, EPUB, Google Docs), and domain plugins (GTD, coaching, business analysis, philosopher personas).
Not human-drives-AI. Not AI-drives-human. Mutual sharpening:
Key: Posture before technique — but posture includes the willingness to be challenged.
Full autonomy spectrum + orchestrated agency → PRACTICE.md
Not "how fast" — how deep:
| Tier | What | Value/Token |
|---|---|---|
| ⚙️ Automation | Rote tasks (convert, deploy, format) | Low |
| 🤝 Assisted Thinking | AI structures human thought | Medium |
| 🧠 Amplified Judgment | AI challenges/deepens reasoning | High |
Maturity = shifting tokens from ⚙️ toward 🧠.
Multiplied by context efficiency (don't waste tokens re-explaining) and compounding (learnings reduce future spend). Full model → PRACTICE.md
| Plugin | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| dstoic | Core cognitive toolkit: 47 skills, 0 commands, 4 hooks | ✅ v0.24.0 |
| gtd | GTD workflow automation for Obsidian vaults | ✅ v0.3.1 |
| coach | Personal coaching: CLEAR + GROW protocols | ✅ v0.3.0 |
| biz | Business analysis toolkit: competitive analysis, UX strategy, UX wireframes, UX evaluation, UX brand identity | ✅ v0.7.1 |
| philosopher | Philosopher personas: historically-grounded dialogue, source attribution, AI meta-cognition | ✅ v0.1.0 |
| cowork | Multi-project context management: switch projects, save/load sessions. Non-CLI friendly | ✅ v0.2.0 |
/install-plugin https://github.com/digital-stoic-org/agent-skills
To install a specific plugin only, add it to .claude/settings.json:
{"plugins": ["digital-stoic-org/agent-skills/dstoic"]}
npx claudepluginhub digital-stoic-org/agent-skills --plugin philosopherMulti-project context management: switch projects, save/load sessions. Designed for non-CLI interfaces (Cowork desktop, Telegram).
Business analysis toolkit: competitive analysis, UX strategy artifacts, market sizing, canvas, PRD, personas
Coaching plugin for Claude Code: personal (CLEAR protocol, anxiety-first) and signal (GROW protocol, strategic positioning) domains.
GTD workflow automation for Obsidian vaults: capture, triage, route, focus
Cognitive development toolkit for Claude Code: OpenSpec workflow management, context serialization, retrospective analysis, and tool orchestration.
Structured roundtable discussion framework with truth-seeking moderator and representative figures for dialectical debate
A gym for your critical thinking. The AI is the coach; you do the work. Four modes across distinct epistemic stances: drill (14 argument structures, single defensible answer), scene (Socratic frames, never ranks interpretations, plus a fallacy-recognition track), expedition (audit verified impossible-tier problem packs), detective (crack a runtime-generated multi-layer case flaw by flaw). Manipulation-recognition domain, fourteen redlines, and a longitudinal passport on your own machine.
Classical formal logic from G. Chelpanov's textbook: concepts, judgments, syllogisms, induction, fallacies, laws of thought. Two text modes — logical review (logika:review, analysis-only report) and argument fixing (rewrite with corrected logic) — plus solving logic textbook problems. Russian-language references distilled from the source book.
Clinically informed wisdom companion for navigating the inner life — emotions, meaning, grief, purpose, relationship, identity. Draws on eight wisdom traditions and modern clinical psychology to create conversations that produce real insight and real movement.
A structured toolkit of thinking skills for Claude Code — covering logic, ethics, creativity, decision-making, systems thinking, communication, and more. Each skill is an invokable command that applies a specific reasoning framework to any situation.
Multi-agent system for authoring academic philosophy literature reviews.