Guides authors through the full lifecycle of a Sociological Theory manuscript—from screening whether an idea qualifies as a theoretical problem, through positioning within a tradition and constructing concepts and mechanisms, to drafting arguments, building conceptual exhibits (typologies, mechanism diagrams), and preparing submissions for ASA-style double-anonymous review.
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin sociological-theory-skillsBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Use when stress-testing the reasoning of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript — turning stated propositions into a valid, warranted argument that survives rival theories and counter-cases. Develops and audits the argument; it does NOT define the concepts (soctheory-theory-construction) or bound the theory's domain (soctheory-boundary-conditions).
Use when specifying the scope, domain, and limits of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript's theory — stating where it holds, where it does not, and what it does NOT claim. Bounds the theory as a contribution; it does NOT build the concepts (soctheory-theory-construction) or audit the reasoning (soctheory-argument-development).
Use when building the figures and typologies of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript — mechanism diagrams, process models, 2x2 typologies, and concept maps that carry theoretical work (never regression tables or data plots). Designs conceptual exhibits; it does NOT build the underlying theory (soctheory-theory-construction) or write the prose (soctheory-writing-style).
Use when articulating the theoretical contribution of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript — naming the new way of seeing it provides and differentiating it from prior theory. Frames the contribution; it does NOT build the theory (soctheory-theory-construction) or audit its reasoning (soctheory-argument-development).
Use when locating a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript in a tradition and conversation — naming whose theory you extend, challenge, or synthesize, and avoiding sibling-journal misattribution. Positions the argument; it does NOT build the concepts (soctheory-theory-construction) or frame the novelty (soctheory-contribution-framing).
English | 简体中文
横跨经管社科 · 人文社科 · 自然科学 · 临床医学 · AI 计算机等多个主流学科,为每一本期刊 / 每一个会议单独编码它的投稿工作流。
🧭 布局指南 · 📚 Skill Pack 一览 · ⚡ 如何使用 · 🗺 路线图 · 🌐 English
先看期刊,再进 Pack。点击任意封面即可进入对应的期刊 Skill 包。
🆕 四个最新学科广度合集 —— 工程技术 40 · 农业环境 30 · 临床医学 30 · 英文人文 36;点击封面进入合集页。
其他合集 · 中文体育学 · 12 本 CSSCI 体育学来源刊
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimAI-first computer-science conference skill stack: 155 conference fit-and-submission profiles plus a CS/AI router. Covers top AI/ML, data mining, vision, NLP, robotics, HCI, systems, security, software engineering, programming languages, databases, and theory venues, with current-cycle CFP and author-kit re-check discipline.
Agent skill stack for submitting to 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal), the top economics journal in China. Eighteen skills across the manuscript lifecycle: China-context topic selection, introduction, bilingual literature review, theory & hypotheses, data & sample, modern causal identification (DID / IV / RDD / DML with heterogeneity-robust estimators), mechanism analysis (post-江艇 2022 paradigm), heterogeneity, robustness, three-line tables, policy implications, abstract, house style, reviewer-lens self-audit, reproducibility, submission preflight, and R&R rebuttals. Ships a runnable Stata + Python code library. Bilingual zh-CN / en docs.
Agent skill stack for articles and proposals targeted at the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) — the open-access, non-technical synthesis journal of the American Economic Association, founded 1987, sister to the Journal of Economic Literature (technical surveys of record) and the AER/AEJ research journals. JEP is largely invited and organized in symposia, and rewards accessible writing readable by 90 percent of AEA members, not new identification or replication. Twelve role skills cover the JEP lifecycle: workflow routing, topic selection for a broad audience, the 2–5 page proposal and symposium pitch ([email protected]), narrative arc for a general economist reader, plain-language translation of technical results, presenting evidence with minimal equations, exhibits a non-specialist can read, the JEP voice, balance and objectivity over advocacy, working with the managing-editor-led editorial team, the pre-submission preflight, and revising for accessibility and balance. Bilingual en / zh-CN docs.
Agent skill stack for submitting to 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) — the flagship journal of the Accounting Society of China and the only accounting title among CSSCI sources (monthly, founded 1980, ISSN 1003-2886, CN 11-1078/F). Built around the journal's defining bar: archival capital-market empirics with accurate institutional / standard-setting detail and an information mechanism, distinguished from generic corporate finance. Covers fit positioning, topic selection, literature review, institutional/standards background, accounting measurement (discretionary accruals, conservatism, disclosure indices), quasi-experimental identification, information mechanism, robustness, tables/figures, standard-setter/regulator implications, submission preflight, and R&R rebuttals.
Agent skill stack for manuscripts targeted at the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) — empirical and quantitative financial economics (corporate finance, investments, capital and security markets, financial institutions, and finance-relevant quantitative methods), published by Cambridge University Press for the Michael G. Foster School of Business at the University of Washington. Built around the JFQA realities: submission via Editorial Manager with a text-searchable PDF, a $350 fee (only $275 refunded if not sent to a reviewer), double-anonymous review, a strict one-paragraph / 100-word abstract cap, prescriptive 8.5x11 / 1-inch / 12-pt Times New Roman double-spaced formatting, a one-year resubmission ban for undisclosed prior rejections, and the JFQA Code Sharing Policy with a dedicated JFQA Dataverse at the Harvard Dataverse. Covers topic fit, literature positioning, causal/identification design for finance, robustness, tables and figures, house style, the code/data archive, referee strategy, submission preflight, and R&R rebuttals. Bilingual en / zh-CN docs; Stata / R / Python conventions.
Theory-development skill stack for Psychological Review, the American Psychological Association's flagship journal for THEORETICAL contributions in scientific psychology. Psychological Review publishes new theoretical frameworks, formal/mathematical/computational models, and major theoretical syntheses across cognition, perception, learning, development, social psychology, and neuroscience; it does NOT publish primary empirical reports (data appear only to motivate or constrain theory). These 12 skills cover theory-fit screening, framing a theoretical problem, formal/conceptual model construction, conversation positioning, deriving predictions and confronting rival models with existing data, scope and boundary conditions, model diagrams and simulation-of-model-behavior exhibits, APA house style, contribution differentiation over prior models, masked peer review via Editorial Manager, submission, and revision. Distinguished from Psychological Bulletin (review/meta-analysis), Behavioral and Brain Sciences (target-article + commentary), and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Comprehensive skill pack with 66 specialized skills for full-stack developers: 12 language experts (Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust, C++, Swift, Kotlin, C#, PHP, Java, SQL, JavaScript), 10 backend frameworks, 6 frontend/mobile, plus infrastructure, DevOps, security, and testing. Features progressive disclosure architecture for 50% faster loading.
A growing collection of Claude-compatible academic workflow bundles. Covers scientific figures, manuscript writing and polishing, reviewer assessment, citation retrieval, data availability, paper reading, literature search, response letters, paper-to-PPTX conversion, and evidence-grounded Chinese invention patent drafting. Rules are organized as reusable skill folders with explicit workflows and quality checks.
Develop, test, build, and deploy Godot 4.x games with Claude Code. Includes GdUnit4 testing, web/desktop exports, CI/CD pipelines, and deployment to Vercel/GitHub Pages/itch.io.
Comprehensive PR review agents specializing in comments, tests, error handling, type design, code quality, and code simplification
Comprehensive feature development workflow with specialized agents for codebase exploration, architecture design, and quality review