From sd0x-dev-flow
Reviews technical spec documents for completeness, feasibility, risks, code consistency, and test strategy. Outputs Markdown report with star ratings, verdict, strengths, and prioritized recommendations.
npx claudepluginhub sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow --plugin sd0x-dev-flowThis skill is limited to using the following tools:
- Keywords: review spec, spec review, tech spec review, review-spec
Reviews technical specifications using expert personas to identify gaps, risks, and missing considerations. Verifies claims against repositories, discusses resolutions, and applies updates.
Reviews spec.md files for completeness, clarity, implementability, testability, and structure. Identifies ambiguities, gaps, and missing sections before implementation.
Analyzes spec files for inconsistencies, missing information, ambiguities, and structure issues. Detects depth level (full-tech, detailed, high-level) and generates markdown/HTML reports.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
/codex-review-fast)/codex-review-doc)/tech-spec)Agent({
description: "Review technical spec for completeness, feasibility, and risk",
subagent_type: "tech-spec-reviewer",
prompt: `Review the following technical spec document.
Follow the review dimensions and output format defined in this skill.`
})
$ARGUMENTS
| Step | Focus |
|---|---|
| 1 | Read the technical spec |
| 2 | Research related code |
| 3 | Completeness check |
| 4 | Feasibility assessment |
| 5 | Risk review |
| 6 | Code consistency |
| 7 | Test strategy |
# Technical Spec Review Report
**Reviewed Document**: `$ARGUMENTS`
## Review Summary
| Dimension | Rating | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Completeness | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ | |
| Feasibility | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ | |
| Risk Assessment | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ | |
| Code Consistency | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | |
| Test Strategy | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ | |
## Overall Verdict
✅ Approved / ⚠️ Needs revision / ❌ Needs redesign
## Strengths
-
## Issues & Recommendations
### 🔴 Must Fix (Blocker)
### 🟡 Suggested Changes
### 🟢 Optional Improvements