From copilot-studio
Generates new Copilot Studio topic YAML files for agent conversation flows, dialogs, or triggers using templates, schema verification via Node.js tools, and agent directory discovery.
npx claudepluginhub microsoft/skills-for-copilot-studio --plugin copilot-studioThis skill is limited to using the following tools:
Generate a new Copilot Studio topic YAML file based on user requirements.
Enforces C++ Core Guidelines for writing, reviewing, and refactoring modern C++ code (C++17+), promoting RAII, immutability, type safety, and idiomatic practices.
Provides patterns for shared UI in Compose Multiplatform across Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web: state management with ViewModels/StateFlow, navigation, theming, and performance.
Implements Playwright E2E testing patterns: Page Object Model, test organization, configuration, reporters, artifacts, and CI/CD integration for stable suites.
Generate a new Copilot Studio topic YAML file based on user requirements.
Auto-discover the agent directory:
Glob: **/agent.mcs.yml
If multiple agents found, ask which one. NEVER hardcode an agent name.
Check for matching templates in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../templates/topics/ first:
greeting.topic.mcs.yml — OnConversationStart greetingfallback.topic.mcs.yml — OnUnknownIntent fallback with escalationarithmeticsum.topic.mcs.yml — Topic with inputs/outputs and computationquestion-topic.topic.mcs.yml — Question with branching logicsearch-topic.topic.mcs.yml — Generative answers from knowledgeauth-topic.topic.mcs.yml — Authentication flowerror-handler.topic.mcs.yml — Error handlingdisambiguation.topic.mcs.yml — Multiple topics matched
If a template matches, use it as the starting point.MANDATORY: Verify ALL kind: values against the schema before writing them:
node ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/schema-lookup.bundle.js kinds # List all valid kind values
node ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/schema-lookup.bundle.js resolve AdaptiveDialog # Resolve trigger structure
node ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/schema-lookup.bundle.js resolve <TriggerType> # Resolve specific trigger
node ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/schema-lookup.bundle.js search <ActionKind> # Verify an action kind exists
NEVER write a kind: value you haven't verified exists in the schema. This is the #1 source of hallucination errors. If schema-lookup.bundle.js search <kind> returns no results, the kind does NOT exist — do not use it.
Determine the trigger type from the user's description:
OnRecognizedIntent — For topics triggered by user phrases (most common)OnConversationStart — For welcome/greeting topicsOnUnknownIntent — For fallback topicsOnEscalate — For escalation to human agentOnError — For error handlingGenerate the topic YAML with:
# Name: comment at the topkind: AdaptiveDialogbeginDialog with correct trigger<nodeType>_<6-8 random alphanumeric>)_REPLACE placeholders with unique IDsCheck settings.mcs.yml for GenerativeActionsEnabled. Read the agent's settings.mcs.yml to check.
Save to the agent's topics/<topic-name>.topic.mcs.yml directory
MANDATORY: Validate the generated file after saving:
Step A: Schema validation — always run this first:
node ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/schema-lookup.bundle.js validate <saved-file.yml>
Step B: LSP-based validation — also run this if the agent has .mcs/conn.json:
Read .mcs/conn.json to get connection details, then:
node ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/manage-agent.bundle.js validate \
--workspace "<path-to-agent-folder>" \
--tenant-id "<tenantId>" \
--environment-id "<envId>" \
--environment-url "<envUrl>" \
--agent-mgmt-url "<mgmtUrl>"
Both validations are complementary: schema validation checks structural correctness (action kinds, property placement), while LSP validation checks Power Fx expressions, cross-file references, and environment-specific rules. If either fails, fix the issues before reporting success to the user.
When the agent has GenerativeActionsEnabled: true in settings:
Use Topic Inputs (AutomaticTaskInput) instead of Question nodes to auto-collect user info.
Place inputs at the AdaptiveDialog root level (NOT inside beginDialog):
kind: AdaptiveDialog
inputs: # <-- at AdaptiveDialog root, NOT inside beginDialog
- kind: AutomaticTaskInput
propertyName: userName
description: "The user's name"
entity: StringPrebuiltEntity
shouldPromptUser: true
beginDialog:
kind: OnRecognizedIntent
id: main
actions:
- ...
Use Topic Outputs instead of SendActivity for final results.
Use outputType at the root level and SetVariable to set output values — do NOT use TaskOutput (which is only valid in TaskDialog connector actions):
kind: AdaptiveDialog
inputs:
- ...
beginDialog:
kind: OnRecognizedIntent
id: main
actions:
- kind: SetVariable
id: setVar_abc123
variable: Topic.result
value: ="computed value"
outputType: # <-- at AdaptiveDialog root
properties:
result:
displayName: result
description: The computed result
type: String
Include inputType/outputType schemas at the AdaptiveDialog root level when using inputs/outputs:
inputType:
properties:
userName:
displayName: userName
description: "The user's name"
type: String
outputType:
properties:
result:
displayName: result
type: String
When a topic exists alongside other topics or other actions (i.e. TaskDialog), think carefully about the topic outputs — it directly affects whether the orchestrator will chain to an action.
Two scenarios:
Topic is self-contained (e.g., reservation confirmation, calculation result): The topic does the work itself. It can gather the inputs too or just ask for those, but work is executed into the topic. In such case, output a confirmation/status message. The orchestrator treats the task as done or not, depending on the confirmation — this is correct.
Topic gathers data for an action to consume (e.g., collecting a complaint that a Teams action should send, without manually calling the action into the topic): The topic output must be the data itself, not a confirmation. If you output "Your complaint has been sent!", the orchestrator assumes the job is done and will NOT invoke the action which means the complaint will never be sent. Instead, output the complaint text so the orchestrator can see there's an action to send it and feed it to such action.
Ask yourself: Does this topic complete the task on its own, or does it prepare data for an action/other topic? If the latter, output the data, not a status message.
Alternative approaches for data-gathering topics:
=: value: =Text(Topic.num1 + Topic.num2){}: activity: "Hello {Topic.UserName}"Text(), Now(), IsBlank(), !IsBlank(), DateTimeFormat.UTCvariable: init:Topic.MyVar (first assignment uses init:)SetTextVariable instead of SetVariable to convert non-text types (Number, DateTime, etc.) to text via template interpolation: value: "Guests: {Topic.NumberOfGuests}"