From grimoire
Guides drafting and refining an arguable thesis for academic essays, research papers, or analytical writing. Based on Purdue OWL and Harvard Writing Center standards.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/grimoire:write-thesis-statementThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Craft a single defensible claim that defines the paper's scope, stakes, and argument — and makes a reader want to see it proven.
Craft a single defensible claim that defines the paper's scope, stakes, and argument — and makes a reader want to see it proven.
Adopted by: Purdue OWL (standard reference for over 30 million academic writers); Harvard College Writing Program; MLA and APA style guides as foundational to academic argument
Impact: Writing programs universally identify a weak or missing thesis as the leading cause of unfocused papers; Harvard Writing Center reports thesis revision as the intervention that most improves paper quality
Why best: A thesis is not an observation or a topic — it is a claim someone could disagree with. Without a falsifiable thesis, a paper has no argument, only summary. The thesis governs every paragraph that follows: if a paragraph does not advance the thesis, it does not belong in the paper.
Weak: "Social media has effects on teenagers." Strong: "Although social media platforms create documented mental health risks for adolescent users, prohibiting access without parallel investment in digital literacy education will increase, not decrease, harm — because prohibition without skills leaves teenagers less equipped to navigate online environments they will encounter regardless."
npx claudepluginhub jeffreytse/grimoire --plugin grimoireStructures a sharp thesis and explicit, valid argument for an analytic-philosophy paper. Use when you have an intuition but need a defensible argument with identified load-bearing premises.
Designs logical argument structures for academic papers, policy briefs, or debates — developing a thesis, evidence, warrants, and rebuttals with internal validity and explicit counterargument handling.
Structures a close reading into a consequential PMLA argument: thesis, warrant, stakes, and counter-reading. Use when your essay is descriptive or lacks a "so what."