Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From grimoire
Audits investment account fees, fund expense ratios, advisor costs, and transaction charges to identify excessive costs and optimize total investment expense.
npx claudepluginhub jeffreytse/grimoire --plugin grimoireHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/grimoire:audit-investment-feesThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Systematically audit all investment-related fees and expenses to identify cost drags, compare to industry benchmarks, and reduce the long-term impact on wealth accumulation.
Guides fee disclosure compliance for advisory firms, brokerage, funds, retirement plans under Form ADV Item 5, Reg BI, ERISA 408(b)(2). Useful for reviewing schedules, prospectuses, hidden fees, total costs.
Reviews investment portfolios and financial plans for unnecessary tax drag, covering asset location, tax-loss harvesting, and withdrawal sequencing.
Compare and select investment vehicles including mutual funds, ETFs, index funds, and separately managed accounts. Use when the user asks about ETF vs mutual fund, expense ratios, fund tax efficiency, ETF creation/redemption, tracking error, or share class comparisons. Also trigger when users mention 'which fund should I buy', 'Vanguard vs Fidelity', 'index fund costs', '12b-1 fees', 'load vs no-load', 'SMA vs ETF', 'fund turnover ratio', 'securities lending', or ask how fees compound over time.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Systematically audit all investment-related fees and expenses to identify cost drags, compare to industry benchmarks, and reduce the long-term impact on wealth accumulation.
Adopted by: John Bogle's cost-minimization framework underlies Vanguard's model (8.7T+ AUM); CFA Institute Investor Trust Study found fees are the #1 factor in investor dissatisfaction; SEC requires fee disclosure in Form N-1A for all mutual funds and in Form ADV Part 2 for all registered investment advisors. Impact: A 1% annual fee difference compounds to a 26% difference in ending wealth over 30 years at 7% gross return; moving from 1.2% to 0.05% expense ratio (index fund) saves $250,000 on a $500,000 portfolio over 30 years; Bogle estimated that investors lose 60%+ of potential returns to fees over a lifetime of investing. Why best: Fees are the only investment variable under the investor's complete control. Reducing fees provides a certain, guaranteed improvement in net return equivalent to the fee reduction — no market prediction required.
Sources: Bogle "The Little Book of Common Sense Investing" (2007); Morningstar "The True Impact of Fund Fees" (2020); SEC Investor Bulletin on Fund Fees and Expenses; CFA Institute "The Future of Investment Management" (2020).
Compile a complete inventory of all investment accounts — list every account: 401(k), IRA, taxable brokerage, 529, HSA, annuities. Include: account value, institution, and account type. Most investors underestimate the number of accounts they hold.
Identify all mutual fund and ETF expense ratios — for each fund/ETF in every account, find the net expense ratio (from fund prospectus, Morningstar, or ETFdb.com). The expense ratio is the annual percentage automatically deducted from assets. Benchmark: index funds (0.03%–0.20%), active funds (0.50%–1.50%), target-date funds (0.10%–0.70%).
Calculate the dollar cost of each fund's expense ratio — Dollar Cost = Account Value in Fund × Expense Ratio. Sum across all holdings. Example: $100,000 in a 1.0% expense ratio fund = $1,000/year in fees, invisibly deducted daily. This makes abstract percentages concrete.
Identify advisor and management fees — locate all fees paid to financial advisors, wealth managers, or robo-advisors: AUM fee (typically 0.25%–1.5% of assets annually), flat fee, hourly fee, or commissions (for broker-dealers). Request the total dollar amount paid in the last 12 months from your advisor.
Identify transaction and hidden fees — audit for: trading commissions (most brokers are now $0 for stocks/ETFs), mutual fund sales loads (front-end: up to 5.75%; back-end/CDSC: up to 5%), 12b-1 fees (marketing fees embedded in fund expense ratio, up to 1%), account maintenance fees, transfer fees, and account closure fees.
Audit 401(k) plan fees specifically — 401(k) plans often have: plan administration fees (0.10%–1.5% of assets), investment management fees (expense ratios), and individual service fees. Request the plan's fee disclosure document (ERISA 404a-5) — your employer must provide it annually.
Benchmark all fees against industry standards — Expense ratios: index ETFs (0.03%–0.10%), index mutual funds (0.05%–0.20%), active funds (0.50%–1.0%). Advisor fees: robo-advisor (0.00%–0.35%), fiduciary advisor (0.50%–1.0% AUM), traditional broker (1.0%–1.5%). Flag any fee 50%+ above benchmark.
Calculate the 30-year fee impact — for each flagged high-fee holding, calculate the compounding fee drag: FV × (1 + (gross return − current fee))^30 vs. FV × (1 + (gross return − lower fee))^30. Use a 7% gross return assumption. Present the dollar difference in ending wealth.
Identify lower-cost substitutes — for each high-fee fund, identify a lower-cost alternative with equivalent or superior risk-adjusted performance: high-cost active fund → equivalent index fund (e.g., S&P 500 index ETF at 0.03%); high-cost target-date fund → direct index fund portfolio. Use Morningstar or ETF.com for alternatives.
Implement changes and track ongoing fees — switch to lower-cost alternatives in tax-advantaged accounts first (no tax consequence); in taxable accounts, weigh the fee savings against capital gains tax from selling. Set a calendar reminder to re-audit fees annually; fee schedules change, and new lower-cost options emerge.