From FORSVN
Spawns multiple expert agents to debate or poll a high-stakes decision with no clear winner. Surfaces tradeoffs, genuine disagreements, and suggests a path with reversibility cost. Standalone or sub-routine.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/forsvn:debate-agents [problem or decision to analyze][problem or decision to analyze]This skill is limited to the following tools:
The summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
*Meta — Multi-perspective panel. Spawns expert agents with distinct stances, surfaces real tradeoffs on high-stakes decisions with no clear winner, recommends a path with reasoning. Standalone or sub-routine.*
references/_shared/anti-sycophancy.mdreferences/_shared/before-starting-check.mdreferences/_shared/execution-policy.mdreferences/_shared/idea-ranking-core.mdreferences/_shared/mode-resolver.mdreferences/_shared/pre-dispatch-protocol.mdreferences/anti-patterns.mdreferences/decision-tree.mdreferences/examples/debate-walkthrough.mdreferences/playbook.mdreferences/procedures/debate.mdreferences/procedures/poll.mdreferences/procedures/pre-dispatch.mdreferences/report-template.mdrouting.yamlscripts/append-loop-result.tsscripts/bootstrap-experience.tsscripts/lib/path-parser.tsscripts/manifest-sync.tsscripts/scaffold-eval-loop.tsMeta — Multi-perspective panel. Spawns expert agents with distinct stances, surfaces real tradeoffs on high-stakes decisions with no clear winner, recommends a path with reasoning. Standalone or sub-routine.
Core Question: "What do multiple perspectives converge on — and where do they genuinely disagree?"
Why this skill, methodology, principles, when NOT to use, constraint-vs-perspective assignment:
references/playbook.md[PLAYBOOK].
Synthesis must name real tradeoffs (not collapse to consensus), surface where stances genuinely disagree, recommend an action + reversibility cost, flag unresolved risks honestly (status → DONE_WITH_CONCERNS if no convergence). Critic auto-fails synthesis that manufactures consensus, hides outliers, or forces a tiebreaker.
Apply references/_shared/before-starting-check.md [PLAYBOOK]. Step 0 — Mode resolution: load references/_shared/mode-resolver.md [PROCEDURE]; standard default; auto-downgrade ≤3-sentence single-decision → fast (debate 2×2 / poll 5×1). --fast does NOT skip structured-output or early-convergence detection. Sub-routine invocations skip steps 1+2 — caller owns problem framing and context. No experience/ read — each invocation is fresh.
Session execution profile (single-vs-multi): inherit per references/_shared/execution-policy.md.
Entry points (standalone vs sub-routine), Warm/Cold Start prompts, sub-routine protocol: references/procedures/pre-dispatch.md [PROCEDURE].
Mode routing keywords, debate path (A1–A4), poll path (B1–B5), config table, edge cases, costs: references/decision-tree.md [PROCEDURE]. Step prompts in references/procedures/debate.md and references/procedures/poll.md.
docs/forsvn/artifacts/meta-debate-agents-[YYYY-MM-DD]-<slug>.md (flat v2; dated; immutable per-run)decision (audit trail; never overwritten)skill, produced_by, version, date, status, stack (=meta), review_surface (html standalone / none sub-routine), decision_state, review_tool, reviewed_at, reviewer, mode, agents, rounds (debate only), provenanceFull frontmatter + report bodies (debate + poll) + slug convention: references/report-template.md [PROCEDURE].
references/anti-patterns.md [ANTI-PATTERN] — re-read before spawning into vague problems, claiming consensus that didn't emerge, forcing a tiebreaker, or writing a sub-routine result to disk.
Standalone: operator reviews dated file (Roughdraft / HTML preview), records decision_state. Sub-routine: integrate recommendation into caller's flow.
Standalone or sub-routine. Typical sub-routine callers: prioritize, architect-system, discover.
references/examples/debate-walkthrough.md [EXAMPLE] — 3-agent debate, mind-change, early convergence.
references/playbook.md [PLAYBOOK], references/decision-tree.md [PROCEDURE], references/report-template.md [PROCEDURE], references/anti-patterns.md [ANTI-PATTERN]references/procedures/{pre-dispatch, debate, poll}.md [PROCEDURE]references/examples/debate-walkthrough.md [EXAMPLE]references/_shared/{before-starting-check, mode-resolver, pre-dispatch-protocol}.mdnpx claudepluginhub hungv47/meta-skills --plugin forsvnOrchestrates multi-agent debates with 2-5 dynamic agents in Challenge (select best variant), Strategy (deep analysis with proposals), or Critic (find weaknesses) modes. Triggers on debate, challenge, compare, critique prompts.
Assembles a multi-perspective deliberation committee with adversarial review, external LLM opinions, and community sentiment analysis. Outputs a Tradeoff Map with contention points and step-back insights.
Implements debate protocols, cross-examination patterns, and synthesis techniques for multi-agent teams in idea validation, PRD reviews, and competitive analysis.