From makerskills
Guides through structured decision-making using 37signals methodology, triaging to 6-8 relevant questions, then archives rationale with a revisit date.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/makerskills:decideThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Picks load-bearing questions from the 37signals guide, walks through them, reaches a call, archives the rationale with a revisit date.
Picks load-bearing questions from the 37signals guide, walks through them, reaches a call, archives the rationale with a revisit date.
Get from the user:
If any are missing, ask. Don't proceed with vague framing.
Read references/questions.md for the full 38 and category mapping. Pick 6–8 based on the decision's characteristics:
Default 5 (always ask):
Add based on type:
| If… | Add |
|---|---|
| Reversibility = hard / one-way door | Q14 (is there a wrong decision?), Q17 (knock-on effects), Q34 (principles bent) |
| Time pressure | Q5 (why hesitating?), Q15 (different tomorrow?), Q22 (when do we have to decide?) |
| Multiple people involved | Q21 (someone else's practice rep?), Q27 (would another opinion help?), Q35 (multiple people deciding what one should?) |
| Lots of data / analysis | Q19 (what missing info would change it?), Q26 (data vs gut?), Q9 deepened |
| Recurring decision | Q11 (last time?), Q23 (one-and-done or repeating?) |
| Customer-facing | Q24 (anyone outside depending?), Q25 (customer vs us impact?) |
| Money decision | Q38 (in the end, is this about money?), Q36 (return on effort?) |
| Stuck / not deciding | Q4 (why hasn't it been made already?), Q10 (what if we don't decide?), Q31 (do you even care?) |
Cap at ~8 questions. More than that turns into analysis paralysis (which is itself one of the things this skill exists to prevent).
Tell the user which questions you picked and why, then proceed.
Ask the questions one at a time, or in a tight cluster if the user wants to write fast. Capture his answers verbatim — don't paraphrase into corporate-speak.
For Q9 (first instinct), get the answer BEFORE diving into analysis. The point is to surface the gut call so we can later check if "analysis" was just rationalization.
Synthesize the answers into a decision. Options:
State the call clearly. No hedging.
Pick a revisit date based on when consequences would show up:
Write what to look for on the revisit ("did MRR move? did the partner ship? do clients still ask for X?").
Write to references/decisions-archive/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>.md:
# Decision: <one-line>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Decide by:** <date or "open">
**Reversibility:** easy / hard / one-way door
**Stakes:** low / medium / high
## Context
<1–3 sentences>
## Questions
### <Q3 phrasing>
<answer>
### <Q8 phrasing>
<answer>
(only questions actually applied — heading is the question text, not "Q3")
## Decision
**<the call, stated clearly>**
## Rationale
<2–3 sentences synthesizing the answers>
## Expected outcome
<what should be true if this was right, by <date>>
## Revisit
**<YYYY-MM-DD>** — <what to look for>
## Source
Questions adapted from [The 37signals Guide to Making Decisions](https://37signals.com/how-we-make-decisions)
Append to references/decisions-archive/INDEX.md:
- 2026-06-16 — [<decision>](./<filename>.md) — **<call>** — <one-line rationale> — revisit 2026-09-16
Show the archive entry in chat. Tell the user the archive path. Offer:
loop skill to fire at the right time)compound-engineering:schedule)business-brainstorm — brainstorm scores the idea on 9 dimensions; decide formalizes the go/no-go afterbusiness-brainstorm — brainstorm → decide is a natural pipeline for "should I build X"deep-research — when a decision is waiting on info (Q19), trigger research firstfeedback_*.md for principles that might be at play (Q34)loop / compound-engineering:schedule — for revisit remindersnpx claudepluginhub coreyhaines31/makerskills --plugin makerskillsRoutes decision-making requests to the appropriate structured thinking tool: option-mapping, criteria-weighting, premortem-analysis, or reversibility-analysis.
Provides structured decision-making by weighing pros and cons, stakeholders, risks, and alternatives. Useful when evaluating options or planning approach.
Guides high-stakes decisions like investments, career moves, or purchases through exhaustive discovery, sequential elimination, structured analysis, and research-backed recommendations. Activates on 'help me decide' or 'should I choose'.