spq-literature-positioning

Literature Positioning (spq-literature-positioning)

An SPQ paper has to land inside a conversation in sociological social psychology, not in psychology broadly or in macro sociology. Reviewers are drawn from the field's traditions and theoretical programs; they expect you to engage the right ones. Positioning is where you show the paper belongs at SPQ.

When to trigger

• Drafting or revising the introduction and the "contribution" paragraph
• A reviewer said you "missed the relevant social-psychological literature" or framed the paper too psychologically
• Your empirical work is solid but it isn't connected to an SPQ-recognized program
• You need to distinguish your contribution from the closest prior papers in the field

How SPQ wants the literature engaged

1. Engage a program, not a pile of citations. Place the paper in a recognizable tradition (symbolic interaction, SSP, group processes, identity theory, affect control / expectation states) and the live debate within it. Cite the works that define that debate.
2. Speak as a sociologist of the self. Frame the contribution around the structure–individual link. A purely individual-cognition framing (JPSP/Psychological Science style) reads as off-field at SPQ.
3. Name the gap precisely. Not "little is known" — say what is contested, mismeasured, under-theorized, or untested in this program, and why resolving it matters for the field's understanding of the self, interaction, or group.
4. Position the contribution as a move in the program. "Identity theory predicts X via verification; we show it is conditional on structural position C," or "expectation-states theory implies Y; our experiment adjudicates between M and M′."
5. Pre-empt the obvious objection. SPQ reviewers know the theory; acknowledge the strongest rival account and say how your design adjudicates it (hand off to spq-research-design).

Cross-tradition engagement (a distinctive SPQ demand)

If your paper is…	also engage…
an experiment on status/expectation states	the broader status-construction and legitimacy literature
an SSP survey on structure and the self	the substantive sociology the structural variable comes from (stratification, networks)
an interpretive study of identity work	identity theory and the symbolic-interactionist canon it speaks to
an affect/emotion study	both affect control / sentiment theory and the sociology of emotion

Anti-patterns

• A "literature dump" with no organizing program or debate
• Framing the paper as individual psychology (loses the sociological reviewers)
• Citing only macro-sociology and ignoring the social-psychological program (loses the SPQ frame)
• Strawmanning prior work, or hiding the closest competitor paper
• Self-citation that breaks masking (SPQ is masked — see spq-submission)

Output format

【Tradition / program】where the paper sits
【Debate】the live disagreement / open question in that program
【Key works】the 3-6 that define it
【Structure–individual link foregrounded?】[Y/N]
【Gap】what is contested / mismeasured / untested
【Move】how this paper changes the debate
【Strongest rival】and how the design will adjudicate it
【Next】spq-theory-building

Supplementary resources

• ../../resources/official-source-map.md — SPQ scope and sociological-social-psychology framing