From poq-skills
Routes a Public Opinion Quarterly manuscript to the correct sub-skill based on submission type and lifecycle stage. Dispatches only, does not draft content.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/poq-skills:poq-workflowThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
The orchestrator for a POQ submission. Figure out the stage and the **submission type**, then send the
The orchestrator for a POQ submission. Figure out the stage and the submission type, then send the user to the matching skill. POQ is the leading journal of public opinion and survey methodology — the router's first job is to make sure the paper is framed as a measurement/opinion contribution with survey error and AAPOR-standard disclosure taken seriously from the start.
poq-rebuttal)| Situation | Type | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Full study — opinion or methods contribution | Original Article (≤ 6,500 words text + notes) | normal pipeline below |
| Single finding, extension, or replication | Research Note (< 3,000 words) | normal pipeline, tighter scope |
| Short, timely read of current poll data | Polls in Context (≤ 2,500 words) | poq-data-analysis + poq-writing-style |
| Integrative review of a literature | Research Synthesis (≤ 6,500 words) | poq-literature-positioning + poq-theory-and-hypotheses |
| Brief assessment of a recent book | Book Review (~1,200 words) | poq-writing-style |
Word caps count text and notes, excluding figures, tables, references, and appendices — so the AAPOR disclosure appendix does not eat your budget. Confirm the current caps (待核实 on section names).
Idea / fit? → poq-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field? → poq-literature-positioning
What's the argument/hypothesis? → poq-theory-and-hypotheses
Is the survey design defensible? → poq-survey-design-and-measurement
Are the analyses design-based? → poq-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear? → poq-tables-figures
Does it read for POQ? → poq-writing-style
Repro package + Appendix A? → poq-transparency-and-data-policy
How will it be judged? → poq-review-process
Ready to submit? → poq-submission
Got an R&R / decision? → poq-rebuttal
topic-selection → literature-positioning → theory-and-hypotheses → survey-design-and-measurement → data-analysis → tables-figures → writing-style → transparency-and-data-policy → review-process → submission → rebuttal
Iterate: most papers loop survey-design ↔ data-analysis several times before writing-style.
Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the public-opinion construct, sampling frame, mode effects, weighting/nonresponse plan, and trend or causal interpretation; then test whether the manuscript addresses survey and public-opinion reviewers who inspect measurement, sampling, mode, nonresponse, and inference about attitudes or behavior.
claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.resources/official-source-map.md for volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.【Stage】idea / positioning / theory / survey-design / analysis / exhibits / writing / transparency / review / submit / rebut
【Type】Original Article / Research Note / Polls in Context / Research Synthesis / Book Review
【Route to】poq-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that
../../resources/external_tools.md — survey data + methodology software by task../../resources/official-source-map.md — official POQ / AAPOR URLs behind every fact in this packnpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin poq-skillsTests whether a project fits Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) and guides submission type selection based on opinion theory, current opinion, or survey validity contributions.
Entry point for any APSR manuscript. Determines the paper's track and lifecycle stage, then routes to the appropriate sub-skill.
Routes British Journal of Political Science manuscripts to the correct sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and format (Research Article, Letter, Comment).