Stats
Actions
Tags
From ajps-skills
Routes AJPS manuscript work to the correct sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and submission type (Article, Research Note, Correspondence). Entry point for AJPS submissions.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/ajps-skills:ajps-workflowThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
The orchestrator for an AJPS submission. Figure out the stage and the **submission type**, then send
The orchestrator for an AJPS submission. Figure out the stage and the submission type, then send the user to the matching skill. AJPS is the MPSA's flagship, Wiley-published, double-blind journal whose defining feature is mandatory third-party verification of replication materials before publication — so this router also makes sure reproducibility is engineered from the start, not bolted on at acceptance.
ajps-rebuttal)| Situation | Type | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Full original study | Article (<= 10,000 words) | normal pipeline below |
| A methodology advance or a meta-analysis | Research Note (<= 4,000 words) | normal pipeline, tighter scope |
| Critique / correction of a paper already published in AJPS | Correspondence (<= 4,000 words) | ajps-literature-positioning + ajps-data-analysis |
The Research Note is not a short empirical paper — at AJPS it is reserved for methodology (including methodology in normative theory) and meta-analyses. Do not mis-route a small empirical study into it.
Idea / fit? -> ajps-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field? -> ajps-literature-positioning
What's the argument? -> ajps-theory-building
Is the design identified? -> ajps-research-design
Are the analyses sound? -> ajps-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear? -> ajps-tables-figures
Does it read well + fit caps? -> ajps-writing-style
Will the code re-run for a verifier? -> ajps-replication-and-verification
How will it be judged? -> ajps-review-process
Ready to submit? -> ajps-submission
Got an R&R / decision? -> ajps-rebuttal
topic-selection -> literature-positioning -> theory-building -> research-design -> data-analysis -> tables-figures -> writing-style -> replication-and-verification -> review-process -> submission -> rebuttal
Iterate: theory <-> design <-> analysis usually loops several times. Critically, start the replication-and-verification package while you analyze — at acceptance an independent verifier re-runs your code, and an unscripted analysis cannot be fixed quickly under deadline.
Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the political theory, design leverage, measurement validity, and scope condition; then test whether the manuscript addresses political-science reviewers who expect tight theory, transparent design, and a contribution that travels across political settings.
claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.resources/official-source-map.md for volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.【Stage】idea / positioning / theory / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / replication / review / submit / rebut
【Type】Article / Research Note (methodology|meta-analysis) / Correspondence
【Route to】ajps-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that
../../resources/external_tools.md — political-science data + software by method../../resources/official-source-map.md — official AJPS URLs behind every fact in this packnpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin ajps-skillsEntry point for any APSR manuscript. Determines the paper's track and lifecycle stage, then routes to the appropriate sub-skill.
Explains AJPS double-blind peer review, desk screening, decision categories, and post-acceptance verification to help shape a paper for submission.
Routes JOP manuscript workflow by lifecycle stage and article type (Research ≤35pp, Short ≤10pp). Dispatches to sub-skills for topic selection, theory, design, analysis, writing, replication, review, submission, rebuttal.