From jpsp-skills
Guides compliance with JPSP transparency requirements: TOP Level 2, JARS reporting, data/code/materials disclosure, preregistration status, and Registered Reports.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/jpsp-skills:jpsp-open-science-and-transparencyThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
JPSP implements APA's **Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines at Level 2 (Requirement)**
JPSP implements APA's Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines at Level 2 (Requirement) (effective July 1, 2021) and requires JARS reporting. Transparency is not optional polish: you must state the availability of data, code, and materials and whether the work was preregistered. Note JPSP does not offer open-science badges — the requirement is the disclosure itself, not a badge.
jpsp-review-process.Post-credibility-revolution, an APA section editor can screen a JPSP manuscript before review on transparency grounds alone. These are the avoidable triggers — confirm exact requirements against the journal's submission guidelines (待核实).
| Trigger | Why it stalls at the editor's desk | The fix before submission |
|---|---|---|
| "Data available on request" | Falls short of TOP Level 2 posting | Deposit in a trusted repository with a persistent DOI, and state it |
| Materials posted, code missing | Reviewers cannot reproduce the analysis | Post the analysis code, not just stimuli/measures |
| Vague "we preregistered" | No registered-vs-exploratory split, no link | Give the (masked) prereg link and label every confirmatory test |
| OSF link shows author names | Breaks masked review | Use an anonymized view-only OSF link |
| Claiming a badge | JPSP does not offer open-science badges | Drop badge language; the disclosure is the requirement |
| No JARS table | Missing standardized reporting | Complete JARS for the design |
Illustrative — wording to adapt, not a quotation of any real manuscript.
A preregistered three-study PPID package would carry a disclosure paragraph like: "Data, analysis code, and materials for all three studies are available at [anonymized OSF DOI]. Studies 1 and 2 were preregistered (links in the repository); Study 3 was exploratory and labeled as such. Reporting follows JARS-Quant. We will maintain availability for at least five years after publication." Note the four parts a reviewer checks: repository + DOI, the confirmatory/exploratory split, the JARS commitment, and the masking-safe link. A missing part is the most common avoidable transparency flag at JPSP. The five-year availability figure is an APA-wide norm — confirm the precise duration against the journal's current submission guidelines.
【Repository】where data/code/materials are posted + DOI
【TOP Level 2 disclosure】availability stated in manuscript? [Y/N]
【Preregistration】status stated + registered vs exploratory marked? [Y/N]
【JARS】correct table completed? [Y/N]
【Registered Report?】considered if prospective? [Y/N]
【Masked】repository links de-identified for review? [Y/N]
【Next】jpsp-review-process
../../resources/external_tools.md — OSF/ResearchBox/Dataverse, JARS, preregistration tools../../resources/official-source-map.md — TOP Level 2, JARS, data-availability and badges policynpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin jpsp-skillsPrepares manuscripts for Journal of Educational Psychology open-science requirements: data/material/code availability statements, JARS reporting, preregistration disclosure, and Open Science Badges under masked review.
Guides compliance with JAP's TOP open-science requirements: data/materials/code deposits with DOIs, data-availability statements, and preregistration linking.
Prepares Psychological Science submissions for open-science requirements including open data/materials, Research Transparency Statement, persistent identifiers, and preregistration quality.