From jcr-skills
Plans and drafts a point-by-point response letter for a JCR revise-and-resubmit, including triaging reviewer concerns, adding required studies/analyses, and satisfying transparency mandates (data posting).
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/jcr-skills:jcr-rebuttalThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- You received a JCR R&R and need a plan plus a response letter
A JCR response letter documents revisions that already exist. Sequence the work:
jcr-contribution-framing) — re-running studies will not save a thin contribution.jcr-data-analysis). CCT: deeper grounding, additional informants, a tighter audit trail.At invited revision, JCR's transparency regime tightens: posting of data and study materials to an approved repository (OSF, Harvard Dataverse, Qualitative Data Repository, ResearchBox) becomes required (accessible to editors) unless an exemption is granted, and replication code must be provided. Update the Data Collection Statement to cover any new studies. Confirm your data-retention plan (≥ 7 years). Address any transparency reviewer concerns explicitly in the letter.
Do not answer every concern with another study. Use this triage:
| Reviewer concern | Strong response | Weak response |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism/process unclear | A targeted mediator, moderator, process measure, or qualitative trace that discriminates the proposed mechanism from rivals | A broad extra study that repeats the main effect |
| Generalizability challenged | A sample, stimulus, context, or cultural setting that tests the stated boundary | A convenience replication with no new boundary information |
| CCT grounding challenged | More field evidence, negative cases, informant variation, or audit-trail clarity | Extra quotation volume without interpretive leverage |
| Transparency challenged | Repository deposit, code, materials, and a revised Data Collection Statement | A promise that materials will be available later |
Cap the revision plan at the smallest set of changes that resolves the editor's decisive doubts. If a new study does not change the conceptual conclusion, use a robustness appendix or drop it.
【Editor's priorities】addressed: [...]
【Contribution】sharpened? advance/deepen/repudiate restated
【New evidence】studies/analyses (experiments) or grounding (CCT) added
【Conflicts】reconciled with reasoning
【Transparency】repository deposit + code + updated Data Collection Statement: done?
【Response letter】point-by-point, with locations; re-anonymized; ≤60 pp
【Next step】resubmit via ScholarOne → jcr-review-process
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin jcr-skillsDrafts response letters for Journal of Consumer Psychology R&R, converting reviewer concerns into new studies and structuring point-by-point rebuttals.
Plans a JM revision and drafts the point-by-point response letter, prioritizing the Coeditor's decisive concerns and strengthening substantive novelty and managerial relevance.
Plans and drafts point-by-point response letters for JAMS R&R revisions, prioritizing editor concerns and strengthening theoretical/managerial contribution.