From aerj-skills
Polishes American Educational Research Journal manuscripts for field-wide readability, APA 7th compliance, abstract limits, and page length restrictions.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/aerj-skills:aerj-writing-styleThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
An AERJ paper must read for the **whole field of education research**, not just specialists, and must
An AERJ paper must read for the whole field of education research, not just specialists, and must comply with APA 7th edition. Write so a researcher from another subfield follows the argument, the stakes, and the contribution. Verify the current length and abstract limits on the official page.
aerj-submission).A field-wide readership means every section must be legible to a non-specialist while staying APA-7 disciplined. Use this as a section-by-section prose audit.
| Manuscript part | What reads well for AERJ's general audience | Reviewer-irritating tell |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Question, field-wide stake, approach, finding by page two | Pages of background before the contribution |
| Framework | Constructs defined in plain language, then operationalized | Theory jargon with no translation |
| Method | Design legible to outsiders; nesting and warrant stated | Acronyms assuming subfield fluency |
| Results | Effect sizes and intervals narrated, not just starred | "p < .05" prose with no practical meaning |
| Discussion | Scope conditions and equity/context stated honestly | Over-claiming beyond the design |
A draft abstract for an evaluation of a formative-assessment coaching program runs 168 words and opens with two sentences of literature. Trimmed to AERJ's 100–120-word target, it becomes: purpose (test whether coaching shifts instruction and learning), method (cluster-randomized across 48 schools, multilevel models), finding (an illustrative 0.16 SD gain, 95% CI [0.05, 0.27], concentrated in high-need schools), significance (informs how districts target instructional support equitably). The filler background is gone; every clause earns its place. Confirm the exact word limit against the journal's current submission guidelines.
【Section reviewed】intro / framework / methods / results / discussion / abstract
【Contribution front-loaded?】[Y/N]
【Reads for the field?】jargon translated, stakes plain [Y/N]
【Abstract】word count (100–120)
【APA 7th compliant】citations + headings + stats [Y/N]
【Length】within limit (verify) [Y/N]
【Next】aerj-transparency-and-data-policy
../../resources/external_tools.md — APA 7th reference managers and typesetting (apa7 / papaja)../../resources/official-source-map.md — APA style, abstract, and length requirementsnpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin aerj-skillsDrafts and polishes Journal of Communication manuscripts to APA 7th edition, enforcing 35-page and 150-word abstract limits. Tightens prose for broad field readability.
Drafts or polishes Journal of Educational Psychology manuscripts to fit APA 7th edition, ≤12,000 words, 250-word abstract, double-spaced, and masked for blind review.
Drafts and revises RER-style prose, abstracts, and introductions with APA 7 and a synthesizing voice. Use when prose summarizes study-by-study instead of integrating across studies.