From aej-macroeconomics-skills
Plans rebuttal letters and revision strategies for AEJ: Macro decision letters (R&R or reject-with-comments). Triages referee comments, maps them to macro skills, and produces a response letter with new exhibits.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/aej-macroeconomics-skills:aejmac-rebuttalThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- An R&R from the editor/coeditor and referees has arrived
AEJ: Macro review is single-blind and editor/coeditor-managed; the coeditor's letter is the binding instruction set — when a referee and the coeditor disagree, follow the coeditor. The response must show that the broad-interest macro contribution survived the scrutiny and that the identified-empirical and/or quantitative-model objections are answered with new exhibits, not new prose alone. Macro referees reward a response that re-runs the decisive check and reports the (possibly changed) number honestly.
aejmac-identification (re-do the SVAR/LP/narrative defense).aejmac-robustness (sample splits, method cross-check).aejmac-theory-model.aejmac-literature-positioning / aejmac-writing-style.aejmac-replication-package.A referee says the monetary-policy output response is a pre-Volcker artifact. You re-estimate post-1984 (aejmac-robustness) and the peak response falls from -0.8% to -0.6% (90% bands overlapping). The strong response block: "We agree the early sample could drive the result. Re-estimating on 1984–2019 (new Table A4, Figure A3), the peak output response is -0.6% (90% band [-1.0, -0.2]), within the band of the full-sample estimate; the qualitative conclusion is unchanged and the magnitude is now reported for the modern monetary regime. We have revised the abstract and Section 4 accordingly." Honest, exhibit-backed, conclusion preserved and appropriately scoped.
【Decision type】R&R / reject-with-comments
【Triage table built】comment → action → owning skill → location → status? [Y/N]
【Coeditor letter treated as binding】conflicts reconciled to it? [Y/N]
【New exhibits for empirical/model objections】listed? [Y/N]
【Honest number movement reported】? [Y/N / NA]
【Letter style】point-by-point with exact pointers? [Y/N]
【Next step】revise manuscript; re-run aejmac-submission preflight before resubmitting
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin aej-macroeconomics-skillsStructures a response-to-referees letter and revision plan for AEJ: Applied R&R or conditional accept decisions. Triages referee comments into must-do, argue, or defer categories.
Drafts a response letter and revision plan for AEJ: Micro R&R. Structures replies to theory referees on correctness, generality, and exposition; triages comments by priority.
Drafts response-to-referees letters and revision plans for REStat decision letters. Structures point-by-point replies, triages comments, and flags identification/measurement objections.