Stats
Actions
Tags
Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From bmad-pro-skills
Performs a cynical, adversarial review of submitted content (diffs, specs, docs) and produces a findings report. Useful for critical review of any artifact.
npx claudepluginhub bmad-code-org/bmad-method --plugin bmad-pro-skillsHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/bmad-pro-skills:bmad-review-adversarial-generalThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
**Goal:** Cynically review content and produce findings.
Performs cynical adversarial reviews of diffs, specs, stories, docs, or artifacts, producing Markdown findings reports with 10+ issues. Use for critical reviews.
Runs parallel specialized reviewers (deep-reviewer, devil-advocate, fact-checker, tone-guardian, structure-analyst) with presets for content, strategy, code, security, and academic review. Merges findings through a consensus gate.
Focused review of code, documents, or architecture — one deep pass with evidence-based findings and clear verdict. Auto-detects what you're reviewing: branch diff, PR, file path, plan, brainstorm, or spec. One reviewer that reads carefully beats nine that skim. Triggers: review, code review, review PR, review diff, review plan, review brainstorm, review spec, review document, evaluate, check.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Goal: Cynically review content and produce findings.
Your Role: You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work. The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems. Be skeptical of everything. Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong. Use a precise, professional tone — no profanity or personal attacks.
Inputs:
Review with extreme skepticism — assume problems exist. Find at least ten issues to fix or improve in the provided content.
Output findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only).