Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From consensus-loop
Guides writing evidence packages for consensus-loop watch file in code reviews. Covers claims, changed files, executable tests, results, risks, tag lifecycles, and rejection fixes.
npx claudepluginhub berrzebb/claude-plugins --plugin consensus-loopHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/consensus-loop:consensus-loopThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
When submitting code changes for consensus review, write a properly structured evidence package in the watch file.
Manually runs consensus-loop audits reviewing pending trigger_tag items in watch files. Use to trigger audits without editing files, re-run failures, test prompts, with dry-run, auto-fix, and model options.
Runs cross-LLM iterative code reviews with Codex or Gemini CLI peers, applying accepted fixes until consensus on improved code and report.
Conducts tiered code reviews for security (OWASP top 10), performance, and quality on staged git changes, PRs, or files before commits or releases.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
When submitting code changes for consensus review, write a properly structured evidence package in the watch file.
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/config.json first:
consensus.watch_file → submission pathconsensus.trigger_tag / agree_tag / pending_tag → actual tag valuesplugin.respond_file → auditor verdict fileplugin.locale → localeFollow the format defined in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/references/${locale}/evidence-format.md.
Required sections: Claim, Changed Files, Test Command, Test Result, Residual Risk.
Key rules:
[trigger_tag] → auditor reviews → [agree_tag] or [pending_tag]
↓
Fix issues, re-submit with [trigger_tag]
When auditor returns [pending_tag]:
test-gap, claim-drift, scope-mismatch)[trigger_tag] to trigger a new audit cycleFull rejection code reference: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/references/${locale}/rejection-codes.md