kit

Show or override the Terraform/OpenTofu CLI detected for this project

Use this agent when a major project step has been completed and needs to be reviewed against the original plan and coding standards. Examples: <example>Context: The user is creating a code-review agent that should be called after a logical chunk of code is written. user: "I've finished implementing the user authentication system as outlined in step 3 of our plan" assistant: "Great work! Now let me use the code-reviewer agent to review the implementation against our plan and coding standards" <commentary>Since a major project step has been completed, use the code-reviewer agent to validate the work against the plan and identify any issues.</commentary></example> <example>Context: User has completed a significant feature implementation. user: "The API endpoints for the task management system are now complete - that covers step 2 from our architecture document" assistant: "Excellent! Let me have the code-reviewer agent examine this implementation to ensure it aligns with our plan and follows best practices" <commentary>A numbered step from the planning document has been completed, so the code-reviewer agent should review the work.</commentary></example>

Coordinates collaborative design sessions that explore requirements, analyze codebase context, and produce an approved design document with trade-offs. Use when building a new feature, adding functionality, creating components, modifying behavior, starting a project, or planning any creative work. DO NOT TRIGGER when the user already has a concrete design and just wants implementation.

The default vehicle for implementing a coherent batch of code changes — a feature, refactor, bug fixes, or remediation from an audit/review — via a background TDD workflow with an independent spec+quality review gate and staged fix-loop (pausing only when blocked). Use it the moment you are about to edit source files for such a batch, whether the plan came from kit:writing-plans, a docs/plans/*.md file, an audit/analysis you just ran, or asks like "execute the plan", "implement this", "do the refactor", or "remediate the findings" — even for small batches. In ultracode mode, implement via build-flow rather than hand-editing or a one-off workflow. DO NOT TRIGGER for a new feature with no design yet (use kit:brainstorming first), for pure analysis/research/review that changes no code (author a plain workflow), or for a single trivial edit.

Orchestrates plan-alignment and quality review via a bundled review workflow that fans out review dimensions (correctness, quality, tests, security, architecture) and adversarially verifies each finding. Use when verifying implementation matches requirements or design/architectural alignment, before merging to main, after completing a major feature, before refactoring, after fixing a complex bug, or when a fresh perspective is needed. Consolidates findings into one report.

Enforces project-specific coding conventions by loading language standards before writing code. Use when about to write, edit, modify, or generate Go, Rust, Python, Tailwind CSS, or HCL (Terraform/OpenTofu) files. Loads once per language per session and overrides default style with project conventions. DO NOT TRIGGER for languages other than Go, Rust, Python, Tailwind CSS, or HCL (Terraform/OpenTofu).

Consults OpenAI Codex CLI for an independent perspective on any question. Shells out to the codex CLI in read-only sandbox mode and relays the response. Use when you want a second opinion from Codex, or when asked to "consult codex", "ask codex", or "codex oracle".

5 hooks across 4 events