AI copilot for academic writing targeting top-tier computer science conferences.
/plugin marketplace add minhuw/claude-writer
/plugin install research-paper-assistant@minhuw/claude-writer
This skill should be used when writing official conference-style reviews for research papers as if from a top-tier systems conference reviewer. Use when the author wants a realistic, formal peer review with scores, strengths, weaknesses, and detailed feedback following standard conference review formats.
This skill should be used when evaluating the logical flow, structure, readability, and overall quality of research paper text. Use for assessing academic writing targeting top-tier computer science conferences.
This skill should be used when performing systematic scans of research paper text to identify and fix typos, grammar errors, inappropriate words, and awkward expressions. Use for thorough proofreading and error correction in academic writing for computer science conferences.
This skill should be used when conducting comprehensive reviews of research papers for top-tier computer science conferences. Use for identifying weaknesses, unclear statements, missing evidence, and structural issues in academic papers. The skill autonomously reads files, searches for patterns, analyzes structure, and provides constructive peer-reviewer feedback.
This skill should be used when polishing academic research paper text for grammar, clarity, fluency, and natural phrasing. Specifically designed for non-native English speakers writing for top-tier computer science conferences.
This skill should be used when suggesting word or phrase alternatives for placeholders in academic research papers. Use when the author needs help selecting appropriate technical terminology for top-tier computer science conferences.
This skill should be used when providing concise summaries of research paper text. Use for quickly understanding the core content, arguments, and contributions of paper sections targeting top-tier computer science conferences.
This skill should be used when validating whether a specific word or phrase is appropriate, commonly used, and correct in academic technical contexts. Use for checking terminology in research papers targeting top-tier computer science conferences.
Interactive learning mode that requests meaningful code contributions at decision points (mimics the unshipped Learning output style)
Automated code review for pull requests using multiple specialized agents with confidence-based scoring
Comprehensive feature development workflow with specialized agents for codebase exploration, architecture design, and quality review
Comprehensive PR review agents specializing in comments, tests, error handling, type design, code quality, and code simplification