Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Manage full anthropological research lifecycle with AI skills and agents: scaffold projects, formulate questions and methods, draft grants/proposals/IRB/ethics protocols, design fieldwork instruments, write articles/chapters/syllabi/CVs, prepare conference materials/job apps, handle peer reviews and dissemination.
npx claudepluginhub mattartzanthro/ai-anthropology-toolkit --plugin ai-anthropologyUse this agent when a user needs help with academic career materials for anthropology — job applications, career statements, or teaching materials. This agent orchestrates the job-materials, career-statements, and teaching-materials skills to provide comprehensive career development support. Covers the full range from CV formatting to syllabus design. <example> Context: A PhD candidate is preparing applications for tenure-track positions. user: "I'm going on the job market this fall and need to prepare my full application package — CV, cover letter, and statements." assistant: "I'll use the career-advisor agent to help you build your complete application package, coordinating across your CV, cover letter, research statement, teaching statement, and diversity statement for a coherent narrative." <commentary> Job market preparation requires coordinated materials that tell a consistent story. The career-advisor ensures all components reinforce each other. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: An assistant professor is preparing their tenure file. user: "I need to write my tenure narrative and update my CV for my third-year review." assistant: "I'll use the career-advisor agent to help you draft your tenure narrative and recalibrate your CV to emphasize the trajectory and impact that tenure committees evaluate." <commentary> Tenure materials require different framing than job market materials — the agent calibrates to career stage and evaluation context. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: A new faculty member is designing their first course. user: "I'm teaching Introduction to Cultural Anthropology for the first time next semester. I need a syllabus and some lesson plans." assistant: "I'll use the career-advisor agent to help you design your course using backward design principles, create a syllabus, and develop lesson plans for key class sessions." <commentary> Course design is a career development task — new faculty often need structured guidance on syllabus design, assignment creation, and lesson planning. </commentary> </example>
Use this agent when a user needs help preparing conference presentations, public-facing writing, or community engagement materials for anthropological research. This agent orchestrates the conference-materials and public-engagement skills to cover the full dissemination arc — from AAA abstracts to op-eds, posters to policy briefs, and slide decks to podcast preparation. <example> Context: A researcher needs to submit an abstract for the AAA annual meeting. user: "I need to write my AAA abstract — it's a 250-word individual paper for the anthropology of technology section." assistant: "I'll use the dissemination-advisor agent to help you draft a 250-word AAA abstract that effectively communicates your argument within the word limit." <commentary> AAA abstracts have strict conventions (250 words, specific structure). The dissemination-advisor provides format-specific guidance. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: A researcher wants to write an op-ed about their findings for a general audience. user: "I want to write a piece for The Conversation about my research on food sovereignty. How do I translate my academic findings for a public audience?" assistant: "I'll use the dissemination-advisor agent to help you translate your research into a public-facing article, adapting your register, structure, and evidence presentation for a non-academic audience." <commentary> Register translation from academic to public writing is a specialized skill. The agent handles the craft of making research accessible without oversimplifying. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: A researcher is preparing a 20-minute conference talk with slides. user: "I have a 20-minute slot at AAA and I need to design my slides and speaker notes." assistant: "I'll use the dissemination-advisor agent to help you design a slide deck using the assertion-evidence model and create timed speaker notes for your 20-minute talk." <commentary> Conference presentation design combines visual design (slides/posters) with oral delivery preparation. The agent covers both. </commentary> </example>
Use this agent when a user needs help with research ethics, IRB protocols, informed consent processes, or ethics review for anthropological research. This agent orchestrates the irb-protocol and informed-consent skills to provide comprehensive ethics guidance. Also use when reviewing an existing research design for ethical issues or when preparing ethics documentation for institutional review. <example> Context: A PhD student is preparing an IRB application for ethnographic fieldwork with undocumented migrants. user: "I need to write my IRB protocol for fieldwork with undocumented communities. I'm worried about the consent process and data security." assistant: "I'll use the ethics-reviewer agent to help you design an ethics protocol that addresses the specific risks of working with vulnerable populations, including consent approaches and data security planning." <commentary> The user needs both IRB protocol writing and consent process design for a sensitive population. The ethics-reviewer agent combines both skills for comprehensive ethics support. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: A researcher received IRB feedback requesting revisions to their consent process. user: "The IRB wants me to revise my consent forms — they said verbal consent isn't sufficient for my digital ethnography project." assistant: "I'll use the ethics-reviewer agent to review the IRB feedback and help you redesign your consent process to satisfy the board while remaining appropriate for your research context." <commentary> IRB revision requests require coordinated work across protocol narrative and consent documents. The ethics-reviewer handles both. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: A researcher is designing a study and wants to think through ethics proactively before submitting to the IRB. user: "Can you review my research plan for ethics issues before I write my IRB application?" assistant: "I'll use the ethics-reviewer agent to conduct a comprehensive ethics review of your research design, identifying risks and recommending appropriate protections." <commentary> Proactive ethics review before IRB submission — the agent identifies issues early rather than after institutional review. </commentary> </example>
Use this agent when a user needs help designing fieldwork data collection instruments, protocols, sampling strategies, or data management systems for anthropological research. This agent draws on the fieldwork-methods skill to provide detailed guidance on interview guides, focus group guides, observation protocols, field note systems, and data management plans. <example> Context: A researcher is preparing for 12 months of ethnographic fieldwork and needs to design their data collection instruments. user: "I'm starting fieldwork next month and need to create my interview guide and observation protocol for studying healing practices in a Peruvian community." assistant: "I'll use the fieldwork-advisor agent to help you design a semi-structured interview guide and observation protocol tailored to your research questions and fieldwork context." <commentary> The user needs multiple data collection instruments designed for a specific fieldwork context. The fieldwork-advisor handles instrument design, pilot planning, and integration across methods. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: A student needs help with sampling and recruitment strategy for their dissertation fieldwork. user: "How do I decide who to interview? I'm studying tech workers in Bangalore but I don't know how to build my sample." assistant: "I'll use the fieldwork-advisor agent to help you design a sampling strategy appropriate to your research questions, population, and epistemic stance." <commentary> Sampling strategy is a core fieldwork planning task that requires attention to research design, access, and feasibility. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: A researcher needs to set up their data management system before entering the field. user: "I need a data management plan for my fieldwork — how should I organize my field notes, transcriptions, and recordings?" assistant: "I'll use the fieldwork-advisor agent to design a data management system covering storage, organization, transcription workflow, de-identification, and backup procedures." <commentary> Data management planning before fieldwork is critical. The agent covers the full data lifecycle from collection through archiving. </commentary> </example>
Use this agent when a user needs help writing grant proposals, funding applications, or dissertation prospectuses for anthropological research. This agent orchestrates the grant-proposal and dissertation-prospectus skills to provide funder-specific guidance and prospectus development. Covers NSF Cultural Anthropology (including CA-DDRIG), Wenner-Gren, Fulbright IIE and Fulbright-Hays, ERC, SSHRC, and Wellcome Trust. <example> Context: A PhD student is writing an NSF CA-DDRIG proposal for dissertation fieldwork. user: "I need to write my NSF DDRIG proposal. I have my research plan but I'm struggling with the project description and broader impacts." assistant: "I'll use the proposal-advisor agent to help you structure your NSF CA-DDRIG project description and broader impacts statement following NSF-specific requirements and conventions." <commentary> NSF CA-DDRIG has specific formatting, page limits, and evaluation criteria. The proposal-advisor provides funder-specific guidance that goes beyond generic grant writing advice. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: A researcher is writing their dissertation prospectus for committee review. user: "My prospectus defense is in two months and I need help structuring the document. My department wants 20-25 pages." assistant: "I'll use the proposal-advisor agent to help you structure your prospectus with the right section architecture, length calibration, and committee-oriented framing." <commentary> Prospectus development requires section-by-section guidance calibrated to institutional norms. The agent handles structure, content, and strategic framing. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: A postdoc is applying for a Wenner-Gren Post-PhD Research Grant. user: "I'm applying for a Wenner-Gren grant to extend my dissertation research into a new field site. Can you help with the application?" assistant: "I'll use the proposal-advisor agent to guide your Wenner-Gren application, ensuring it meets their specific evaluation criteria and framing expectations." <commentary> Different funders have different expectations. The agent provides Wenner-Gren-specific guidance distinct from NSF or Fulbright conventions. </commentary> </example>
Use this skill whenever a user needs help writing, evaluating, or responding to peer reviews for anthropological research. Triggers include: any mention of "peer review," "review a manuscript," "write a review," "reviewer comments," "respond to reviewers," "rebuttal letter," "revision plan," "manuscript evaluation," "assess this paper," "reviewing for [journal name]," "R&R response," "how to review," "reviewer feedback," "revise and resubmit." Covers writing constructive peer reviews for anthropology journals, evaluating manuscripts from the reviewer's perspective, and responding to reviewer feedback (rebuttal letters, revision plans). Review types: invited review, desk review, blind review, open review. Do NOT use for grant review panels (use grant-proposal skill) or student work feedback (use teaching-materials skill). This skill handles peer review as a professional scholarly practice and revision as a strategic engagement with reviewer critique.
Use this skill whenever a user needs help writing professional philosophy statements for academic career advancement. Triggers include: any mention of "research statement," "teaching statement," "teaching philosophy," "diversity statement," "DEI statement," "tenure narrative," "promotion statement," "research vision," "future research plans," "statement of purpose," "personal statement for academic job," "how to write a research statement," "how to write a teaching statement," or "tenure portfolio." Covers research statements, teaching statements/philosophies, diversity statements, and tenure/promotion narratives for anthropologists at all career stages. Do NOT use for CVs, cover letters, or job talks (use job-materials skill), course syllabi or assignments (use teaching-materials skill), or grant proposals (use grant-proposal skill).
Use this skill whenever a user needs help preparing materials for an anthropology conference presentation. Triggers include: any mention of "conference abstract," "AAA abstract," "organized session," "roundtable proposal," "poster session," "workshop proposal," "slide deck," "conference presentation," "conference talk," "academic poster," "speaker notes," "20-minute talk," "15-minute talk," "CASCA abstract," "AES presentation," "SfAA abstract," "help with my AAA panel," "poster design," or "oral delivery." Covers abstract writing for individual papers, organized sessions, roundtables, poster sessions, and workshop proposals; slide deck design for 15-20 minute conference talks; academic poster design including content structure and visual hierarchy; and speaker notes with oral delivery preparation. Do NOT use for job talks (use job-materials skill), public talks for non-academic audiences (use public-engagement skill), or full paper writing (use academic-paper skill when available).
Use this skill whenever a user needs help writing, drafting, revising, or structuring a dissertation prospectus, dissertation proposal, qualifying exam proposal, upgrade document, transfer document, or fieldwork clearance proposal for anthropological research. Triggers include: any mention of "prospectus," "dissertation proposal," "qualifying exam," "QE," "upgrade proposal," "transfer of status," "confirmation of status," "fieldwork proposal," or "fieldwork clearance" in the context of anthropology or ethnographic research; requests to structure, draft, or revise any section of a dissertation proposal (problem statement, research questions, theoretical positioning, literature review, methods, ethics, timeline, budget); questions about what a committee expects or how to prepare for a prospectus defense or upgrade viva. Also use when the user says "I need to write my prospectus," "I'm preparing for my qualifying exam," "how do I structure a dissertation proposal," or "what should my prospectus include." Covers US prospectuses (Berkeley, Harvard, and other programs), UK upgrade/transfer/fieldwork proposals (LSE, Cambridge, Oxford), and dual-purpose prospectuses that also serve as grant applications. Do NOT use for standalone grant proposals without a committee audience (use grant-proposal skill), general academic paper writing (use academic-paper skill), or research question development without a prospectus context (use research-question skill).
Use this skill whenever a user needs help designing fieldwork data collection instruments or protocols for qualitative or anthropological research. Triggers include: "interview guide," "interview protocol," "focus group guide," "observation protocol," "field notes," "field note template," "fieldwork protocol," "data collection instruments," "sampling strategy," "purposive sampling," "snowball sampling," "data management plan," "DMP," "transcription protocol," "researcher training," "pilot testing," "semi-structured interview," "life history interview," "key informant interview," or "participant observation protocol." Covers interview guides, focus group guides, observation protocols, field note systems, sampling and recruitment, training, pilot testing, and data management. Do NOT use for IRB protocol narratives (use irb-protocol skill), consent documents (use informed-consent skill), or methodology selection (use methodology-selection skill).
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge.
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge.
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Build systematic literature databases using OpenAlex API. Phased workflow for search, screening, snowballing, annotation, and synthesis with structured user interaction.
Pragmatic qualitative analysis for interview data. Supports theory-informed or data-first approaches with systematic coding, quality indicators, and publication-ready synthesis.
PhD-level research capabilities: literature review, multi-source investigation, critical analysis, hypothesis-driven exploration, quantitative/qualitative methods, and lateral thinking
Comprehensive UI/UX design plugin for mobile (iOS, Android, React Native) and web applications with design systems, accessibility, and modern patterns
Multi-model consensus engine integrating OpenAI Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, and Claude CLI for collaborative code review and problem-solving.
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts ~75% of tokens while keeping full technical accuracy by speaking like a caveman.
AI-powered network analysis, visualization, and export using Gephi Desktop. Provides 73 MCP tools for graph construction, community detection, centrality analysis, layout algorithms, and publication-ready export.
A suite of AI anthropology tools for qualitative research
The AI Anthropology Toolkit provides computational tools for anthropological and qualitative research. Every component is grounded in the conventions, debates, and craft knowledge of anthropology and cognate qualitative social sciences. Epistemic stance (interpretivist, critical, STS, feminist, applied, etc.) is treated as a first-class design parameter that shapes methods, writing, and analysis.
The toolkit includes standalone notebooks for qualitative data analysis, a Claude Code plugin with research lifecycle skills and agents, and will expand to include MCP servers and additional components over time.
AI Anthropology is an emerging field that combines:
This toolkit focuses on the second aspect: using AI to enhance traditional anthropological research methods while preserving the interpretive frameworks that make the discipline unique.
Standalone notebooks for computational qualitative analysis. Most can be run directly in Google Colab. Notebooks marked Local should be run on your own machine (see Running Locally below).
| Notebook | Run | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Academic Literature Explorer | Search 250M+ scholarly works across all disciplines via OpenAlex with citation counts and open access detection | |
| Qualitative Codebook Builder | Build qualitative codebooks from source literature with AI-assisted code generation, validation, and structured export | |
| Interview Transcript Semantic Chunker | Segment interview transcripts into semantically coherent chunks with speaker-aware processing and coherence scoring | |
| Coding and Thematic Analysis | Apply codes to qualitative data and build themes using deductive, inductive, or hybrid approaches | |
| Text Network Analysis | Build co-occurrence networks from text with community detection, centrality metrics, and interactive visualization | |
| Topic Modeling (BERTopic) | Discover topics in text collections using transformer-based clustering with interactive visualizations and zero-shot mode | |
| Named Entity Recognition (GLiNER2) | Extract people, places, organizations, concepts, and custom entity types from text using zero-shot NER |