Guide Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscript submission: evaluate fit and article type, structure theory and evidence, design exhibits, ensure transparency, preflight submission requirements, and craft revise-and-resubmit responses — all tailored to PAR's dual scholarly-practitioner audience and Evidence for Practice requirement.
Based on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscript so it survives expert, double-blind review and supports honest Evidence for Practice — uncertainty, robustness, and triangulation appropriate to quantitative, experimental, or mixed work. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.
Use when positioning a Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a field-wide contribution that also informs practice. PAR readers span public management, governance, and the practitioner community, so the paper must engage the core PA debates and not just one niche. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.
Use when writing the response to a Public Administration Review (PAR) revise-and-resubmit. PAR weighs both scholarly rigor and the practitioner "so-what," so the response must convert each reviewer, satisfy the handling editor, and keep the Evidence for Practice intact. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
Use when defending the research design of a Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscript — public-management causal designs (DiD around reforms, survey & field experiments on bureaucrats/citizens, RD, IV), case comparison and process tracing, and mixed methods. PAR judges each tradition on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
Use when you need to understand how Public Administration Review (PAR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review, desk screening for fit/scope/practice-relevance, the reject / major / minor / accept decision spectrum, the role of Evidence for Practice, and the article types. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
English | 简体中文
横跨经管社科 · 人文社科 · 自然科学 · 临床医学 · AI 计算机等多个主流学科，为每一本期刊 / 每一个会议单独编码它的投稿工作流。
🧭 布局指南 · 📚 Skill Pack 一览 · ⚡ 如何使用 · 🗺 路线图 · 🌐 English
先看期刊，再进 Pack。点击任意封面即可进入对应的期刊 Skill 包。
🆕 四个最新学科广度合集 —— 工程技术 40 · 农业环境 30 · 临床医学 30 · 英文人文 36；点击封面进入合集页。
其他合集 · 中文体育学 · 12 本 CSSCI 体育学来源刊
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claim
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin public-administration-review-skillsAI-first computer-science conference skill stack: 155 conference fit-and-submission profiles plus a CS/AI router. Covers top AI/ML, data mining, vision, NLP, robotics, HCI, systems, security, software engineering, programming languages, databases, and theory venues, with current-cycle CFP and author-kit re-check discipline.
brycewang-stanfordAgent skill stack for submitting to 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal), the top economics journal in China. Eighteen skills across the manuscript lifecycle: China-context topic selection, introduction, bilingual literature review, theory & hypotheses, data & sample, modern causal identification (DID / IV / RDD / DML with heterogeneity-robust estimators), mechanism analysis (post-江艇 2022 paradigm), heterogeneity, robustness, three-line tables, policy implications, abstract, house style, reviewer-lens self-audit, reproducibility, submission preflight, and R&R rebuttals. Ships a runnable Stata + Python code library. Bilingual zh-CN / en docs.
brycewang-stanfordAgent skill stack for articles and proposals targeted at the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) — the open-access, non-technical synthesis journal of the American Economic Association, founded 1987, sister to the Journal of Economic Literature (technical surveys of record) and the AER/AEJ research journals. JEP is largely invited and organized in symposia, and rewards accessible writing readable by 90 percent of AEA members, not new identification or replication. Twelve role skills cover the JEP lifecycle: workflow routing, topic selection for a broad audience, the 2–5 page proposal and symposium pitch ([email protected]), narrative arc for a general economist reader, plain-language translation of technical results, presenting evidence with minimal equations, exhibits a non-specialist can read, the JEP voice, balance and objectivity over advocacy, working with the managing-editor-led editorial team, the pre-submission preflight, and revising for accessibility and balance. Bilingual en / zh-CN docs.
brycewang-stanfordAgent skill stack for submitting to 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) — the flagship journal of the Accounting Society of China and the only accounting title among CSSCI sources (monthly, founded 1980, ISSN 1003-2886, CN 11-1078/F). Built around the journal's defining bar: archival capital-market empirics with accurate institutional / standard-setting detail and an information mechanism, distinguished from generic corporate finance. Covers fit positioning, topic selection, literature review, institutional/standards background, accounting measurement (discretionary accruals, conservatism, disclosure indices), quasi-experimental identification, information mechanism, robustness, tables/figures, standard-setter/regulator implications, submission preflight, and R&R rebuttals.
brycewang-stanfordAgent skill stack for manuscripts targeted at the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) — empirical and quantitative financial economics (corporate finance, investments, capital and security markets, financial institutions, and finance-relevant quantitative methods), published by Cambridge University Press for the Michael G. Foster School of Business at the University of Washington. Built around the JFQA realities: submission via Editorial Manager with a text-searchable PDF, a $350 fee (only $275 refunded if not sent to a reviewer), double-anonymous review, a strict one-paragraph / 100-word abstract cap, prescriptive 8.5x11 / 1-inch / 12-pt Times New Roman double-spaced formatting, a one-year resubmission ban for undisclosed prior rejections, and the JFQA Code Sharing Policy with a dedicated JFQA Dataverse at the Harvard Dataverse. Covers topic fit, literature positioning, causal/identification design for finance, robustness, tables and figures, house style, the code/data archive, referee strategy, submission preflight, and R&R rebuttals. Bilingual en / zh-CN docs; Stata / R / Python conventions.
brycewang-stanfordAgent skill stack for manuscripts targeted at the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART) — the theory-and-research flagship of public administration, published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Public Management Research Association (PMRA), submitted via Editorial Express under double-blind peer review. JPART rewards a contribution to public-management theory (bureaucratic behavior, public service motivation, red tape, representative bureaucracy, performance management, collaborative and network governance, behavioral public administration) carried by rigorous, increasingly experimental and causal empirics. Facts covered include the ~12,000-word limit that includes the abstract, tables, and references, the theory-first abstract template, the 3–5 keyword convention (theory / research theme / method), OUP author-date style with DOIs, double-blind anonymization (cover-sheet identifiers, third-person self-citation), blinded preregistration reports, and the mandatory public release of data and software code as a condition of publication with a Data Availability Statement. Covers topic selection and venue fit vs. PAR / JPAM / Governance, literature positioning, public-management theory building, research design across experiments / causal observational / multilevel / mixed methods, analysis norms (common-method bias, selection), exhibits, OUP-style writing, transparency and data policy, the review process, submission preflight, and R&R rebuttals. Bilingual en / zh-CN docs.
brycewang-stanfordComprehensive skill pack with 66 specialized skills for full-stack developers: 12 language experts (Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust, C++, Swift, Kotlin, C#, PHP, Java, SQL, JavaScript), 10 backend frameworks, 6 frontend/mobile, plus infrastructure, DevOps, security, and testing. Features progressive disclosure architecture for 50% faster loading.
JeffallanUpstash Context7 MCP server for up-to-date documentation lookup. Pull version-specific documentation and code examples directly from source repositories into your LLM context.
upstashA growing collection of Claude-compatible academic workflow bundles. Covers scientific figures, manuscript writing and polishing, reviewer assessment, citation retrieval, data availability, paper reading, literature search, response letters, paper-to-PPTX conversion, and evidence-grounded Chinese invention patent drafting. Rules are organized as reusable skill folders with explicit workflows and quality checks.
Yuan1z0825v9.44.1 — Patch release for Gemini environment/version detection and qwen auth gating. Run /octo:setup.
nyldnUpstash Context7 MCP server for up-to-date documentation lookup. Pull version-specific documentation and code examples directly from source repositories into your LLM context.
anthropics