Dispatch panels of specialized subagents to review projects from multiple angles — expert audits, first-impression personas, task-completion flows, and pedantic nitpicks
npx claudepluginhub 2389-research/claude-plugins --plugin review-squadUse when a project needs multi-perspective review — pre-launch audit, post-refactor check, inherited codebase assessment, or periodic health check. Dispatches parallel expert reviewer agents with persona framing.
Use when you want to see a site through fresh eyes — how different types of people experience it for the first time. Dispatches agents with varying tech sophistication who land on the site cold and report confusion, friction, and first impressions.
Use when you want to verify a site works by having agents act as real users completing common tasks — browsing, subscribing, purchasing, searching. Each agent has a goal and clicks through the real flow using browser MCP tools.
Use when you want pedantic, nitpicky, opinionated feedback on a site or project — the kind of feedback you'd get from Hacker News commenters, typography snobs, grammar pedants, and standards purists. Finds the things that professional reviewers skip because they're "too minor."
Your project is about to ship. Instead of one reviewer catching what they catch, Review Squad dispatches a panel — security analyst, UX critic, performance specialist, pedantic nitpicker — each doing deep parallel analysis and reporting back.
/plugin marketplace add 2389-research/claude-plugins
/plugin install review-squad@2389-research
| Skill | What it does | When to use it |
|---|---|---|
review-squad:experts | Expert audit panel (SEO, a11y, security, perf, etc.) | Before launch — catch what you missed |
review-squad:normies | First-time visitors across a sophistication spectrum | When you can't tell if your site makes sense to outsiders |
review-squad:regulars | Task-oriented users verifying real flows work | Smoke test signup, checkout, search — the flows that matter |
review-squad:well-actually | Pedantic nitpickers finding what pros skip | Before posting to HN — find the nits before they do |
Expert audit before launch:
User: "Run a review-squad:experts audit on my site before we go live"
Claude: I'd suggest this panel for your site:
- Security analyst — auth flows, data handling, headers
- Performance specialist — load times, bundle size, caching
- SEO reviewer — meta tags, structured data, crawlability
- Accessibility auditor — screen readers, contrast, keyboard nav
Approve this panel, or swap anyone out?
[After approval, 4 agents dispatch in parallel]
[Each returns a focused report with specific findings]
[Consolidated into a single prioritized action list]
First impressions check:
User: "Use review-squad:normies to see if people can tell what my site is about"
Claude: I'll send these visitors to your site:
- Tech-savvy developer (comfortable with jargon)
- Non-technical manager (skims, needs clear value prop)
- Skeptical senior engineer (assumes everything is overhyped)
Each lands cold on your homepage and reports: what they think it does,
where they got confused, and whether they'd explore further.
Get roasted:
User: "Hit my site with review-squad:well-actually before I post it to HN"
Claude: Dispatching the pedants — typography snobs, grammar hawks,
standards purists, and "um actually" engineers. They'll find the
things professional reviewers skip because they're too polite.
Three of the four skills (normies, regulars, well-actually) use browser MCP tools, so you'll need a dev server running for those.
If Review Squad caught something your tests didn't, a ⭐ helps us know it's landing.
Built by 2389 · Part of the Claude Code plugin marketplace
Team-oriented workflow plugin with role agents, 27 specialist agents, ECC-inspired commands, layered rules, and hooks skeleton.
UI/UX design intelligence. 67 styles, 161 palettes, 57 font pairings, 25 charts, 15 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, Astro, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind, shadcn/ui, Nuxt, Jetpack Compose). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient.
Comprehensive skill pack with 66 specialized skills for full-stack developers: 12 language experts (Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust, C++, Swift, Kotlin, C#, PHP, Java, SQL, JavaScript), 10 backend frameworks, 6 frontend/mobile, plus infrastructure, DevOps, security, and testing. Features progressive disclosure architecture for 50% faster loading.
Upstash Context7 MCP server for up-to-date documentation lookup. Pull version-specific documentation and code examples directly from source repositories into your LLM context.
Comprehensive startup business analysis with market sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM), financial modeling, team planning, and strategic research
This skill should be used when users need to generate ideas, explore creative solutions, or systematically brainstorm approaches to problems. Use when users request help with ideation, content planning, product features, marketing campaigns, strategic planning, creative writing, or any task requiring structured idea generation. The skill provides 30+ research-validated prompt patterns across 14 categories with exact templates, success metrics, and domain-specific applications.