From claude-scholar
Reviews LaTeX documents for compilation errors, cross-references, typography, draft artifacts, and formatting consistency before submission.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/claude-scholar:latex-cleanupThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Review technical correctness by default. Do not rewrite prose or modify files unless the user asks.
Review technical correctness by default. Do not rewrite prose or modify files unless the user asks.
Use a user-provided manuscript path when available. Otherwise, identify the build entrypoint from the project configuration and TeX structure. Follow \input and \include dependencies rather than reviewing only the main file.
Build with the project's normal entrypoint when possible. Inspect both the compilation log and rendered PDF; do not infer page-layout problems from source alone.
?? markers.draft document-class or package options, showkeys, lineno, \overfullrule, and other debugging aids that should not ship.Dr.~Smith. Do not insert ~ before \footnote{}.Figure versus Fig. consistent. Spell out abbreviations at first use.\text{} for words in subscripts, standard operators such as \log and \Pr, and \operatorname{} for custom operators.Section~\ref{} versus Sec.~\ref{} consistent.TODO, FIXME, XXX, HACK, TBD, PLACEHOLDER, literal Lorem ipsum, \lipsum, \todo, \note, \marginpar, and similar draft material.``double quoted text''
`single quoted text'
\ldots or \dots for ellipses and escape %, &, #, $, and _ where required.Preserve the author's voice. Correct demonstrable errors in subject-verb agreement, articles, tense, modifiers, parallel structure, fragments, and run-on sentences. Check which versus that, less versus fewer, between versus among, and compared to versus compared with in context. Treat phrases such as in order to, a total of, and the fact that as compression candidates, not automatic substitutions.
Prioritize compilation failures, missing content, unresolved references, and submission blockers. Give a file and line for each source finding, cite log or rendered-page evidence when relevant, and propose a concrete fix. Separate demonstrated problems from preferences or venue-dependent judgments. Do not enumerate checks that passed unless the user requests a checklist.
npx claudepluginhub yy/claude-scholar --plugin claude-scholarChecks a LaTeX paper before submission: verifies references, compilation, figure quality, affiliations, acknowledgements, and data/code availability, returning a severity-ranked report.
Audits LaTeX manuscripts for academic typographic conventions: booktabs tables, caption placement, dashes/quotes, cross-references, page layout, and professional polish. Triggers on formatting review requests.
Reviews existing scientific manuscripts (.tex/.typ/.md) with structured, location-anchored comments covering sentence clarity, notation, figures, DRY, factual claims, and references. User approves edits before changes are applied.