From code-quality
Use when user needs multi-stakeholder analysis, business impact assessment, or wants perspectives from different roles. Triggers on: "analyze from business perspective", "what would stakeholders think", "impact analysis", "business case for", "ROI of"
npx claudepluginhub wgordon17/personal-claude-marketplace --plugin code-qualityThis skill is limited to using the following tools:
Simulates perspectives from different organizational roles to provide comprehensive business impact analysis.
Searches, retrieves, and installs Agent Skills from prompts.chat registry using MCP tools like search_skills and get_skill. Activates for finding skills, browsing catalogs, or extending Claude.
Searches prompts.chat for AI prompt templates by keyword or category, retrieves by ID with variable handling, and improves prompts via AI. Use for discovering or enhancing prompts.
Guides Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR) with cacheComponents enabled. Implements 'use cache', cacheLife(), cacheTag(), revalidateTag(), static/dynamic optimization, and cache debugging.
Simulates perspectives from different organizational roles to provide comprehensive business impact analysis.
Simulate perspectives from these roles:
Focus Areas:
Key Questions:
Focus Areas:
Key Questions:
Focus Areas:
Key Questions:
Focus Areas:
Key Questions:
Focus Areas:
Key Questions:
Focus Areas:
Key Questions:
| Stakeholder | Impact Level | Key Concerns | Benefits | Risks |
|-------------|--------------|--------------|----------|-------|
| CTO | High | [List] | [List] | [List] |
| Product | Medium | [List] | [List] | [List] |
| Engineering | High | [List] | [List] | [List] |
| Finance | Medium | [List] | [List] | [List] |
| Security | Low | [List] | [List] | [List] |
| Operations | High | [List] | [List] | [List] |
| Category | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical | [Risk] | H/M/L | H/M/L | [Action] |
| Business | [Risk] | H/M/L | H/M/L | [Action] |
| Operational | [Risk] | H/M/L | H/M/L | [Action] |
| Security | [Risk] | H/M/L | H/M/L | [Action] |
| Compliance | [Risk] | H/M/L | H/M/L | [Action] |
## Initial Investment
| Item | One-Time Cost | Notes |
|------|---------------|-------|
| Development | $X | [hours × rate] |
| Infrastructure | $X | [setup costs] |
| Training | $X | [team upskilling] |
| **Total Initial** | **$X** | |
## Ongoing Costs (Annual)
| Item | Annual Cost | Notes |
|------|-------------|-------|
| Maintenance | $X | [hours × rate] |
| Infrastructure | $X | [hosting, licenses] |
| Support | $X | [vendor, on-call] |
| **Total Annual** | **$X** | |
## Expected Benefits (Annual)
| Benefit | Annual Value | Notes |
|---------|--------------|-------|
| Time savings | $X | [hours saved × rate] |
| Revenue impact | $X | [new revenue or retained] |
| Risk reduction | $X | [avoided incident costs] |
| **Total Annual** | **$X** | |
## ROI Calculation
- **Payback Period**: X months
- **3-Year ROI**: X%
- **NPV (5% discount)**: $X
## Recommendation: [APPROVE / DEFER / REJECT]
### Summary
[2-3 sentence summary of recommendation and key reasoning]
### Key Factors For
1. [Factor 1 with supporting evidence]
2. [Factor 2 with supporting evidence]
3. [Factor 3 with supporting evidence]
### Key Factors Against
1. [Factor 1 with supporting evidence]
2. [Factor 2 with supporting evidence]
### Conditions for Success
- [Condition 1 that must be true for this to succeed]
- [Condition 2]
### Key Assumptions
- [Assumption 1 that the analysis depends on]
- [Assumption 2]
### Review Triggers
- Revisit this decision if:
- [Trigger 1: e.g., costs exceed budget by 20%]
- [Trigger 2: e.g., key team member leaves]
- [Trigger 3: e.g., market conditions change]
# Business Panel Analysis: [Decision/Topic]
## Executive Summary
[3-4 sentence summary of the decision, key stakeholder perspectives, and recommendation]
## Decision Context
- **What we're deciding**: [Clear statement]
- **Why now**: [Urgency or trigger]
- **Alternatives considered**: [Brief list]
## Stakeholder Perspectives
### CTO View
**Position**: [Support/Oppose/Neutral]
**Key Points**:
- [Point 1]
- [Point 2]
**Concerns**: [What worries this stakeholder]
### Product View
**Position**: [Support/Oppose/Neutral]
**Key Points**:
- [Point 1]
- [Point 2]
**Concerns**: [What worries this stakeholder]
[...repeat for each stakeholder...]
## Impact Analysis
### Stakeholder Impact Matrix
[See template above]
### Risk Assessment
[See template above]
### Cost-Benefit Analysis
[See template above]
## Consensus & Disagreement
### Points of Agreement
- [What all stakeholders agree on]
### Points of Disagreement
- **Issue**: [Description]
- **CTO view**: [Position]
- **Finance view**: [Position]
- **Resolution**: [How to resolve or who decides]
## Recommendation
[See template above]
## Next Steps
1. [Immediate action with owner]
2. [Short-term action with owner and deadline]
3. [Follow-up checkpoint with criteria]
Before simulating panel perspectives, check whether the analysis involves:
If any apply, invoke /deep-research (via the Skill tool) before proceeding to Step 3 —
use External mode for pure market/technology questions, or Bridged mode when the analysis
involves a technology the project already uses. Pass the analysis topic as the research
question. The research report will be saved to {memory_dir}/research/ (if a memory
directory exists).