analyze-docs

Step 0 — Load configuration

Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/config.yaml. If it does not exist, tell the user to copy config.example.yaml to config.yaml and fill in their values. Stop here.

Extract:

• docs_sources — array of documentation sources (each with type and optional cloud_id)

If docs_sources is empty or not defined, tell the user no documentation sources are configured and stop.

Step 1 — Load adapters

For each source in {config.docs_sources}:

• Read the adapter at ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/analyze-docs/adapters/{source.type}.md
• If the adapter does not exist, warn the user and skip that source

Store all loaded adapters and their associated source configs.

Step 2 — Parse argument

From $ARGUMENTS:

1. If the argument is a URL, identify which source it belongs to and fetch that specific page.
2. If the argument is a search term, search across all configured sources.
3. If no argument provided, ask the user what to search for.

Step 3 — Search across sources

For each configured documentation source, use the adapter's search command to find relevant pages.

Search strategy:

1. Exact term match first
2. Related terms (synonyms, translations if applicable)
3. Broader category if no results

Collect the top 5 results per source.

Step 4 — Fetch and extract content

For each relevant page found:

1. Fetch the full page content using the adapter's fetch command
2. Extract information WITHOUT interpreting it — use direct quotes
3. Note the page title, URL, and last modified date

Critical rule: Extract only what the documentation explicitly states. Do not infer, summarize, or add context that is not in the source.

Step 5 — Identify business rules

From the extracted content, identify explicit business rules:

• Validation rules ("X must be...", "X cannot exceed...")
• Process rules ("When X happens, Y must...")
• Constraint rules ("Only users with role X can...")
• Data rules ("Field X is calculated as...")

For each rule, record:

• The exact quote
• The source page
• Confidence level (explicitly stated vs. implied)

Step 6 — Detect contradictions

Compare information across sources. Flag:

• Different definitions of the same term
• Conflicting rules or processes
• Outdated information (older source contradicts newer)
• Missing information in one source that another covers

Step 7 — Assess coverage

For each aspect of the search topic, assess documentation coverage:

Aspecto	Fuente 1	Fuente 2	...	Cobertura
{aspect}	✅ Documented	❌ Not found	...	{partial/full/none}

Step 8 — Output

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📚 DOCUMENTATION ANALYSIS: "{search_term}"
   Sources: {count} | Pages found: {total}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

━━ SOURCE: {source_name} ({source_type}) ━━━━━━

📄 {page_title}
   URL: {url}
   Updated: {date}

   Relevant content:
   > "{direct quote 1}"
   > "{direct quote 2}"

📄 {page_title_2}
   ...

━━ BUSINESS RULES FOUND ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

1. "{exact rule}" — Source: {page_title} ({source})
2. "{exact rule}" — Source: {page_title} ({source})

━━ CONTRADICTIONS ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

⚠️ {source_a}/{page_a} says: "{X}"
   {source_b}/{page_b} says: "{Y}"
   → Needs clarification from: {audience}

━━ COVERAGE ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

{coverage table from Step 7}

━━ NOT DOCUMENTED ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

The following aspects were NOT found in any source:
- {missing_aspect_1}
- {missing_aspect_2}

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━