python-packaging

Scientific Python Packaging

A comprehensive guide to creating, structuring, and distributing Python packages for scientific computing, following the Scientific Python Community guidelines. This skill focuses on modern packaging standards using pyproject.toml, PEP 621 metadata, and the Hatchling build backend.

Quick Decision Tree

Package Structure Selection:

START
  ├─ Pure Python scientific package (most common) → Pattern 1 (src/ layout)
  ├─ Need data files with package → Pattern 2 (data/ subdirectory)
  ├─ CLI tool → Pattern 5 (add [project.scripts])
  └─ Complex multi-feature package → Pattern 3 (full-featured)

Build Backend Choice:

START → Use Hatchling (recommended for scientific Python)
  ├─ Need VCS versioning? → Add hatch-vcs plugin
  ├─ Simple manual versioning? → version = "X.Y.Z" in pyproject.toml
  └─ Dynamic from __init__.py? → [tool.hatch.version] path

Dependency Management:

START
  ├─ Runtime dependencies → [project] dependencies
  ├─ Optional features → [project.optional-dependencies]
  ├─ Development tools → [dependency-groups] (PEP 735)
  └─ Version constraints → Use >= for minimum, avoid upper caps

Publishing Workflow:

1. Build: python -m build
2. Check: twine check dist/*
3. Test: twine upload --repository testpypi dist/*
4. Verify: pip install --index-url https://test.pypi.org/simple/ pkg
5. Publish: twine upload dist/*

Common Task Quick Reference:

# Setup new package
mkdir -p my-pkg/src/my_pkg && cd my-pkg
# Create pyproject.toml with [build-system] and [project] sections

# Development install
pip install -e . --group dev

# Build distributions
python -m build

# Test installation
pip install dist/*.whl

# Publish
twine upload dist/*

When to Use This Skill

• Creating scientific Python libraries for distribution
• Building research software packages with proper structure
• Publishing scientific packages to PyPI
• Setting up reproducible scientific Python projects
• Creating installable packages with scientific dependencies
• Implementing command-line tools for scientific workflows
• Following community standards for scientific Python development
• Preparing packages for peer review and publication

Core Concepts

1. Modern Build Systems

Python packages now use standardized build systems instead of classic setup.py:

• PEP 621: Standardized project metadata in pyproject.toml
• PEP 517/518: Build system independence
• Build backend: Hatchling
• No classic files: No setup.py, setup.cfg, or MANIFEST.in

2. Build Backend: Hatchling

• Hatchling: Excellent balance of speed, configurability, and extendability
• Modern, standards-compliant build backend
• Automatic package discovery in src/ layout
• VCS-aware file inclusion for SDists
• Extensible through plugins

3. Package Structure

• src/ layout: Required for proper isolation (prevents importing uninstalled code)
• Automatic discovery: Hatchling auto-detects packages in src/
• Standard structure: Consistent organization for testing and documentation

4. Scientific Python Standards

• Dependency management: Careful version constraints
• Python version support: Minimum version without upper caps
• Development dependencies: Use dependency-groups (PEP 735)
• Documentation: Include README, LICENSE, and docs folder
• Testing: Dedicated tests folder

Quick Start

Minimal Scientific Package Structure

my-sci-package/
├── pyproject.toml
├── README.md
├── LICENSE
├── src/
│   └── my_sci_package/
│       ├── __init__.py
│       ├── analysis.py
│       └── utils.py
├── tests/
│   ├── test_analysis.py
│   └── test_utils.py
└── docs/
    └── index.md

See assets/pyproject-minimal.toml for a complete minimal pyproject.toml template.

Package Structure Patterns

See references/patterns.md for detailed package structure patterns including:

• Pure Python scientific package (recommended)
• Scientific package with data files
• Versioning strategies
• Building and publishing workflows
• Testing installation

Project Metadata

See references/metadata.md for detailed information on:

• License configuration (SPDX format)
• Python version requirements
• Dependency management
• Classifiers
• Optional dependencies (extras)
• Development dependencies (dependency groups)

Command-Line Interface

For CLI tool implementation, see scripts/cli-example.py for a complete example using Click.

Register in pyproject.toml:

[project.scripts]
sci-analyze = "my_sci_package.cli:main"

File Templates

Ready-to-use templates are available in the assets/ directory:

• assets/.gitignore - .gitignore for scientific Python packages
• assets/pyproject-minimal.toml - Minimal pyproject.toml template
• assets/pyproject-full-featured.toml - Full-featured pyproject.toml with all options
• assets/readme-template.md - README template for scientific packages
• assets/sphinx-conf.py - Sphinx documentation configuration
• assets/github-actions-publish.yml - GitHub Actions workflow for publishing

Documentation

NumPy-style Docstrings

See references/docstrings.md for examples of NumPy-style docstrings and documentation best practices.

Checklist for Publishing Scientific Packages

• Code is tested with pytest (>90% coverage recommended)
• Documentation is complete (README, docstrings, Sphinx docs)
• Version number follows semantic versioning
• CHANGELOG.md or NEWS.md updated
• LICENSE file included with appropriate license
• pyproject.toml has complete metadata
• Package uses src/ layout
• Package builds without errors (python -m build)
• SDist contents verified (tar -tvf dist/*.tar.gz)
• Installation tested in clean environment
• CLI tools work if applicable
• All classifiers are appropriate
• Python version constraint is correct (no upper bound)
• Dependencies have appropriate version constraints
• Repository is linked in project.urls
• Tested on TestPyPI first
• GitHub release created (if using)
• Documentation published (ReadTheDocs, GitHub Pages)
• Citation information included (CITATION.cff or README)

Best Practices for Scientific Python Packages

1. Use src/ layout - Prevents importing uninstalled code, ensures proper testing
2. Use pyproject.toml - Modern standard, tool-independent configuration
3. Use Hatchling - Modern, fast, and configurable build backend
4. No classic files - Avoid setup.py, setup.cfg, MANIFEST.in
5. Version constraints - Minimum versions for dependencies, no upper cap for Python
6. Test SDist contents - Always verify what files are included/excluded
7. Use TestPyPI - Always test publishing before going to production
8. Document thoroughly - README, docstrings, Sphinx documentation
9. Include LICENSE - Use SPDX identifiers, choose appropriate scientific license
10. Use dependency-groups - For development dependencies (PEP 735)
11. Semantic versioning - Clear versioning strategy
12. Automate CI/CD - GitHub Actions for testing and publishing
13. Type hints - Include py.typed marker for typed packages
14. Citation information - Make it easy for users to cite your work
15. Community standards - Follow Scientific Python guidelines

Common Issues and Solutions

See references/common-issues.md for solutions to:

• Import errors in tests
• Missing files in distribution
• Dependency conflicts
• Python version incompatibility

Resources

• Scientific Python Development Guide: https://learn.scientific-python.org/development/
• Simple Packaging Guide: https://learn.scientific-python.org/development/guides/packaging-simple/
• Python Packaging Guide: https://packaging.python.org/
• PyPI: https://pypi.org/
• TestPyPI: https://test.pypi.org/
• Hatchling documentation: https://hatch.pypa.io/latest/
• build: https://pypa-build.readthedocs.io/
• twine: https://twine.readthedocs.io/
• Scientific Python Cookie: https://github.com/scientific-python/cookie
• NumPy documentation style: https://numpydoc.readthedocs.io/