ralphex-adopt - Convert Plans Into ralphex Format

ralphex-adopt - Convert Plans Into ralphex Format

SCOPE: Read a source plan in some other format and produce a new ralphex-format plan at docs/plans/YYYYMMDD-<slug>.md. The source is never modified. Existing target files are never silently overwritten.

Supported source shapes:

• OpenSpec change: directory containing proposal.md, tasks.md, optional specs/**/spec.md
• spec-kit spec: directory or file with spec/plan/tasks separation
• GitHub or GitLab issue: URL, #N, or owner/repo#N with body that contains a task checklist
• Generic task-list: any structured markdown/text with headings and bullet items
• Free-form markdown: prose brain dump with no fixed structure

This is a single-skill conversion: discover, classify, ask focused questions when in doubt, draft, review, write. Do not modify code, do not run tests, do not commit. Output is the new plan file only.

Step 0: Optional CLI Check

This check is informational only. Missing ralphex CLI must NOT break the flow — conversion does not require it. Do NOT block, exit, prompt the user, or wait for installation. Always continue to Step 1 regardless of the result.

which ralphex

If which ralphex returns non-zero, briefly mention that ralphex is needed to execute the converted plan later (not now), list install options once, and continue immediately:

• macOS (Homebrew): brew install umputun/apps/ralphex
• Linux (Debian/Ubuntu): download .deb from https://github.com/umputun/ralphex/releases
• Linux (RHEL/Fedora): download .rpm from https://github.com/umputun/ralphex/releases
• Any platform with Go: go install github.com/umputun/ralphex/cmd/ralphex@latest

If which ralphex succeeds, say nothing and proceed.

Step 1: Resolve Source From Argument Shape

Inspect $ARGUMENTS and pick exactly one source by shape, in this order:

1. Full URL (starts with http:// or https://):

   • GitHub issue/PR URL → use gh issue view <url> --json title,body,labels (or gh pr view)
   • GitLab issue/MR URL → use glab issue view <url> (or glab mr view)
   • Other URL → fetch with curl -fsSL only if it points at a raw markdown file; otherwise AskUser to paste the body

2. Bare reference #N:

   • Use the current git repository's host. Detect with git remote get-url origin and choose gh or glab accordingly.
   • If git remote get-url origin fails (not a git repo, or no origin remote), AskUserQuestion to disambiguate: "GitHub", "GitLab", "Provide qualified owner/repo#N instead", "Cancel". Re-resolve based on the answer.
   • GitHub: gh issue view N --json title,body (try gh pr view N if issue not found)
   • GitLab: glab issue view N (try glab mr view N if not found)

3. Qualified reference owner/repo#N or group/project#N:

   • GitHub: gh issue view N --repo owner/repo
   • GitLab: glab issue view N --repo group/project

4. Existing path — first probe the literal argument as a filesystem path with test -e "$ARGUMENTS":

   • File: read with the Read tool
   • Directory: list with ls -la <path> and inspect contents
     • If contains proposal.md AND tasks.md → likely OpenSpec, proceed to Step 2
     • If contains a single *.md → use that file
     • Otherwise AskUser which file inside the directory is the plan

5. Bare name — only if the argument failed every check above (not a URL, not #N or owner/repo#N, and test -e returned false). A bare name has no path separators and contains no path-like characters:

   • Search filesystem with Glob for plausible matches (e.g., **/*<name>*.md, **/*<name>*/proposal.md)
   • If exactly one match → use it
   • If multiple matches → AskUser to pick one (use AskUserQuestion with up to 4 most relevant; if more, summarize and AskUser to paste the path)
   • If no matches → AskUser whether they meant a path, an issue number, or something else

6. No argument:

   • Use AskUserQuestion: "Where is the source plan?" with options like "Paste it", "Provide a file path", "Provide an issue number/URL", "Cancel".

After resolving, store: source kind (github-issue, gitlab-issue, file, directory, pasted), source content (full text or directory listing + key files), and source identifier for the slug suggestion.

Step 2: Detect Format

Look at the resolved content and classify it as one of:

• OpenSpec: directory has both proposal.md and tasks.md. May also have specs/**/spec.md deltas.
• spec-kit: directory or single file shows the spec-kit shape — separate spec/plan/tasks sections, often with explicit "Specification", "Implementation Plan", "Tasks" headings.
• Issue with checklist: source kind is github-issue or gitlab-issue, and the body contains one or more - [ ] items.
• Generic task-list: any structured source with headings and bullet items that is not OpenSpec, spec-kit, or an issue. Section heading style and item-marker style may vary.
• Free-form: prose-only or near-prose source with no clear task list. Includes brain-dump style text.

If multiple signals point in different directions (e.g., a directory with both a proposal.md and a clearly spec-kit-shaped plan.md), AskUser to confirm which format to use before drafting.

Step 3: Confidence Guard — Ask Before Drafting

Before writing any draft, scan the source for items the agent cannot confidently map. For each uncertainty, AskUser before drafting, never embed placeholder markers (???, TBD, [FIXME]) into the converted plan.

Common uncertainties:

• Which headings should become Task sections vs. Overview/Context vs. Technical Details?
• How should a long flat list be split into Tasks (logical phases vs. fixed groups)?
• A bullet item is vague ("clean up the auth module") — what concrete steps are intended?
• Source mixes intent (feature + refactor + bug fix) — should this become one plan or be flagged as multi-plan?
• Source is in a non-English natural language — ask whether to translate Overview/Context prose or preserve the original (the structural keyword Task in headers is always English regardless).
• Source is very large (>1000 lines) or very small (<10 lines) — confirm scope before processing.

Use AskUserQuestion with concrete options. If the question is genuinely open-ended (more than 4 possibilities), present a numbered list in chat and ask the user to reply with a number.

Do not draft, then ask. Ask, then draft.

Step 4: Convert Per Format

All converted plans must satisfy ralphex's plan-format rules:

• File starts with # <Plan Title> H1.
• Standard sections in order: ## Overview, ## Context, ## Development Approach, ## Testing Strategy, ## Progress Tracking, optional ## Technical Details (when source has architecture/spec details to preserve), ## Implementation Steps, optional ## Post-Completion.
• Task headers use the structural form ### Task <N>: <title>. The keyword Task is always English, even when the plan title and task titles are in another natural language. ralphex's plan parser only recognizes English Task and Iteration keywords; localized variants (Задача, タスク, Tarea, etc.) will not be detected.
• Checkboxes (- [ ] / - [x]) appear only inside Task sections. Do not put checkboxes in Overview, Context, Success criteria, or any other section — they cause the executor to spawn extra iterations.
• Every Task should end with a "write tests" checkbox and a "run project tests" checkbox, phrased generically (project may be in any language).
• The final Task is always ### Task <last>: Verify acceptance criteria containing items that re-run the test suite, run the project linter, and confirm requirements from Overview were met.

Per-format mapping rules:

OpenSpec

• proposal.md "## Why" or equivalent → ## Overview (the problem statement and motivation)
• proposal.md "## What Changes" → ## Context (impacted components and constraints)
• specs/**/spec.md delta sections (ADDED / MODIFIED / REMOVED requirements) → ## Technical Details (concrete behavior changes)
• tasks.md numbered list → ## Implementation Steps grouped into ### Task N: sections. Each top-level numbered group becomes a Task; sub-bullets become checkboxes.
• Add write tests and run project tests checkboxes to each Task even if absent in source.
• Append a final ### Task <last>: Verify acceptance criteria Task.

spec-kit

• "Specification" section → ## Overview and ## Context
• "Implementation Plan" / architecture section → ## Technical Details
• "Tasks" section → ## Implementation Steps with one ### Task N: per logical phase
• Add write tests, run project tests, and final Verify acceptance criteria Task.

GitHub / GitLab Issue with Checklist

• Issue title → # <Plan Title> (drop trailing punctuation, normalize whitespace)
• Issue body prose above the first checklist → ## Overview
• Issue labels and metadata → ## Context (e.g., "Reported in repo X, labels: bug, p1, area/auth")
• Top-level - [ ] items in body → ## Implementation Steps
  • If the body has H3 sub-headings that group items, preserve those grouping into Tasks.
  • Otherwise, group every 5–7 items into one Task; create a synthetic title summarizing the group.
• Preserve - [x] checked state from the source.
• Add write tests and run project tests per Task; append final Verify acceptance criteria Task.

Generic Task-List

• Infer the heading style (#, ##, ###, or numbered headings) from the source.
• Infer the item style (- [ ], * [ ], 1., -, plain dashes).
• Normalize:
  • Top-level grouping headings become ### Task N: <title> (use English Task keyword regardless of the source language).
  • Item lines become - [ ] checkboxes inside the Task.
  • Preserve checked state if the source uses any form of "done" marker.
• If grouping is unclear (single flat list, ambiguous heading hierarchy), AskUser before drafting how to split.
• Add write tests, run project tests, and final Verify acceptance criteria Task.

Free-Form Markdown

• Infer intent from the prose (feature / bug fix / refactor / migration / docs).
• First paragraph or two → ## Overview.
• Background, constraints, references → ## Context.
• Decompose the body into 3–7 Task groups by logical phase (read carefully; do not invent steps the source does not imply).
• For each Task, write 3–6 concrete checkboxes that map directly to phrases in the source. Do not embed [FIXME] or ??? — if a phrase is too vague, AskUser in Step 3 first.
• Add write tests, run project tests, and final Verify acceptance criteria Task.

Output Skeleton (all formats)

# <Plan Title>

## Overview

<one or two paragraphs describing what is being built and why>

## Context

- <impacted components>
- <relevant constraints>
- <reference to source: e.g., "Adopted from issue #312" or "Adopted from OpenSpec change auth-rework">

## Development Approach

- Testing approach: regular (or TDD if source explicitly calls it out)
- Complete each task fully before moving to the next
- Update this plan when scope changes during implementation

## Testing Strategy

- Unit tests required for every code-changing Task
- Run project tests after each Task before proceeding

## Progress Tracking

- Mark completed items with `[x]` immediately when done
- Update plan if implementation deviates from original scope

## Technical Details

<optional: detailed behavior, data shapes, references to spec sections; omit this section if the source had no such content>

## Implementation Steps

### Task 1: <title>

- [ ] <concrete action>
- [ ] <concrete action>
- [ ] write tests for new functionality
- [ ] run project tests - must pass before next task

### Task 2: <title>

- [ ] <concrete action>
- [ ] write tests for new/changed functionality
- [ ] run project tests - must pass before next task

### Task <last>: Verify acceptance criteria

- [ ] verify all requirements from Overview are implemented
- [ ] run full project test suite
- [ ] run project linter - all issues must be fixed

## Post-Completion

*Items requiring manual intervention - no checkboxes, informational only*

- <manual verification steps if any>
- <external system updates if any>

Step 5: Review Loop With revdiff

Create a temp file and capture its path. Each Bash tool call runs in its own subshell, so shell variables (including $DRAFT) do not persist between calls. You must capture the literal path printed by mktemp and substitute that exact string into every subsequent tool call (Write, launcher, rm) — do not rely on $VAR references across calls.

Use a portable mktemp form. The -t prefix form differs between macOS BSD and Linux GNU. A template ending in XXXXXX is portable, but a suffix after XXXXXX (e.g., XXXXXX.md) is silently treated as a literal filename by BSD mktemp and would cause concurrent runs to collide on the same path. Generate the random path first, then rename to add the .md extension:

TMP=$(mktemp "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/ralphex-adopt-XXXXXX") && mv "$TMP" "$TMP.md" && printf '%s\n' "$TMP.md"

Read the path from stdout (e.g., /tmp/ralphex-adopt-aB3xY9.md) and remember it. Refer to that literal string below as <draft-path>. Write the draft content to <draft-path> via the Write tool.

An EXIT trap is not used because each Bash call is its own subshell — the trap would fire immediately. Cleanup is explicit at the end of Step 6 (success) and on every cancel path (rm -f <draft-path> with the literal path substituted).

Run revdiff directly on the draft (bypass ~/.claude/scripts/draft-review.sh — that wrapper runs a writing-style lint that misfires on plan-shaped content and writes a publish-approval marker this skill does not need). Substitute the literal <draft-path> you captured above:

LAUNCHER="$HOME/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/revdiff/.claude-plugin/skills/revdiff/scripts/launch-revdiff.sh"
test -x "$LAUNCHER" && "$LAUNCHER" --wrap --only=<draft-path>

If the launcher path does not exist (test -x fails), skip directly to the in-chat fallback below — the user has revdiff installed via Homebrew or go install but does not have the Claude marketplace plugin layout.

Read the launcher's stdout from the Bash tool result directly. Do not assign it to a shell variable — variables do not persist between Bash tool calls (see Step 5 preamble).

• Empty stdout → user reviewed and approved silently. Proceed to Step 6.
• Non-empty stdout → user left annotations. Read each annotation, revise the draft accordingly (rewrite the literal <draft-path> in place via Write), then re-run revdiff. Repeat until stdout is empty.

If the launcher path is missing, OR launch-revdiff.sh fails with any revdiff-related error (exit code non-zero with "revdiff" in stderr — "not found in PATH", "command not found", etc.), fall back to in-chat review:

• Print the draft content in chat.
• Use AskUserQuestion: "Approve draft?" with options "Accept", "Revise" (capture feedback as next message), "Reject" (cancel the conversion).
• On "Revise", treat the next user message as annotation text and revise; loop until "Accept".

Step 6: Write Target File

Compute the target filename:

• Date: today's date in YYYYMMDD form (no dashes, e.g., 20260430).
• Slug: derive from the plan title — lowercase, ASCII-only, words joined by -, max ~50 characters. Drop articles (a/an/the) and trailing punctuation.

Use AskUserQuestion to confirm or edit the slug before writing:

• header: "Filename"
• question: "Use slug <computed-slug> for docs/plans/<date>-<slug>.md?"
• options:
  • label: "Yes, use this slug"
  • label: "Edit slug" (capture next user message as the new slug)
  • label: "Cancel"

If the target file already exists:

• Use AskUserQuestion: "docs/plans/<filename> already exists. What should we do?"
• options:
  • label: "Bump suffix" — append -v2, then -v3, ... to the slug; check docs/plans/ and docs/plans/completed/ for collisions, increment until both are clear
  • label: "Pick a new slug" (capture next message)
  • label: "Cancel"
• Never silent-overwrite.

Sanity-check the draft before writing:

• The draft must contain at least one ### Task line that matches the form ### Task <N>: <title>.
• The draft must contain at least one - [ ] checkbox under a Task section.
• If either check fails, return to Step 4 to revise (do not write the file).

Once the filename is confirmed and sanity checks pass:

mkdir -p docs/plans

Write the draft content to docs/plans/<final-name>.md via the Write tool. Then explicitly clean up the temp file by substituting the literal <draft-path> captured in Step 5:

rm -f <draft-path>

Also run the same rm -f <draft-path> on any cancel path before exiting (Step 1, Step 3, Step 5 reject, Step 6 cancel) — always with the literal path substituted, never as $DRAFT.

Report to the user:

Adopted plan: docs/plans/<final-name>.md

Source: <source kind and identifier>
Tasks: <N>

Next: run `ralphex docs/plans/<final-name>.md` to execute.

Edge Cases

• Missing path: if user passed a path that does not exist, AskUser to correct or cancel.
• Ambiguous bare name: more than one match — AskUser to pick.
• URL fetch failure: AskUser to paste body as fallback.
• Directory with no recognizable structure: list contents, AskUser to point at the file.
• Format detection conflict: multiple signals — AskUser to choose format.
• Zero task-like content: source has no items the agent can convert — AskUser whether to infer Tasks from prose or cancel.
• Mixed localization: source mixes English and another language — confirm whether to keep the original language for prose. Structural Task keyword stays English regardless.
• Huge source (>1000 lines): warn before processing and AskUser whether to proceed, summarize, or split into multiple plans.
• Tiny source (<10 lines): warn that the result will be sparse; AskUser whether to proceed or expand interactively.
• Output collision: target file already exists — never silent overwrite (see Step 6).
• Idempotency: re-running on the same source uses today's date. Old converted plans in docs/plans/completed/ are never modified.

Tool Fallbacks

• revdiff missing: fall back to in-chat AskUser Accept/Revise/Reject loop (see Step 5).
• gh missing (when source is a GitHub issue/URL): AskUser to paste the issue body manually.
• glab missing (when source is a GitLab issue/URL): AskUser to paste the issue body manually.
• Both gh and glab missing for a #N argument: AskUser to paste the issue body or provide a different reference.

Constraints

• Never modify the source plan or directory.
• Never write to docs/plans/ without an explicit user-confirmed slug.
• Never silently overwrite an existing target file.
• Never embed placeholder markers (???, TBD, [FIXME]) in the output — AskUser before drafting instead.
• Never assume the target project is a specific language. Test/run-test checkboxes must use generic phrasing such as "write tests" and "run project tests".
• Never cite ralphex internal source files (e.g., pkg/...) in the converted plan content.
• Do not run tests, do not run linters, do not commit, do not push. The skill only produces a plan file.