Plans massive work requests by creating research spikes, documenting unknowns and decisions, and structuring work into epics and milestones.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/issue-driven-development:initiative-architectureopusThis skill is limited to the following tools:
The summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
When work is too large for a single epic, it becomes an **initiative**. This skill methodically investigates, documents, and structures massive requests into a resumable, tractable plan.
When work is too large for a single epic, it becomes an initiative. This skill methodically investigates, documents, and structures massive requests into a resumable, tractable plan.
Core principle: Document everything. Every unknown answered, every decision made, every assumption validated. The architecture must be resumable by a fresh context.
Announce at start: "I'm using initiative-architecture to plan this massive request. This will involve investigation, documentation, and structured decomposition."
An initiative is work that:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ INITIATIVE RECEIVED │
│ (from work-intake as MASSIVE) │
└─────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PHASE 1: DOCUMENT UNKNOWNS │
│ List everything we don't know │
│ Prioritize by: blocks other decisions │
└─────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PHASE 2: RESEARCH SPIKES │
│ Create issues for each unknown │
│ Time-box investigations │
│ Document findings in issues │
└─────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PHASE 3: DECISION LOG │
│ Record all decisions made │
│ Document alternatives considered │
│ Note constraints and trade-offs │
└─────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PHASE 4: EPIC STRUCTURE │
│ Group deliverables into epics │
│ Define dependencies between epics │
│ Create epic tracking issues │
└─────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PHASE 5: MILESTONE PLANNING │
│ Create delivery milestones │
│ Assign epics to milestones │
│ Establish order of work │
└─────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
READY FOR IMPLEMENTATION
(via epic-management per epic)
gh issue create \
--title "[Initiative] [NAME]: Architecture & Planning" \
--label "initiative,planning" \
--body "## Initiative: [NAME]
## Original Request
[The original user request verbatim]
## Goal
[What success looks like at the highest level]
## Current Understanding
[What we know so far]
## Unknowns (To Be Investigated)
### Critical Unknowns (Block Architecture)
- [ ] Unknown 1: [Question]
- [ ] Unknown 2: [Question]
### Important Unknowns (Block Implementation)
- [ ] Unknown 3: [Question]
- [ ] Unknown 4: [Question]
### Nice-to-Know (Inform Decisions)
- [ ] Unknown 5: [Question]
## Research Spikes
[Will be populated as spikes are created]
## Decisions Log
[Will be populated as decisions are made]
## Epic Structure
[Will be populated after research]
## Milestones
[Will be populated after epic structure]
---
**Status:** 🔬 Investigating
**Last Updated:** [DATE]
**Context Recovery:** Read this issue + linked spikes + decision log"
| Category | Definition | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Blocks architecture decisions | Research spike immediately |
| Important | Blocks implementation | Research spike before epic |
| Nice-to-Know | Informs decisions | Research during implementation |
For each critical/important unknown:
gh issue create \
--title "[Spike] [INITIATIVE]: [UNKNOWN QUESTION]" \
--label "spike,research,initiative-[NAME]" \
--body "## Research Spike
**Parent Initiative:** #[INITIATIVE_NUMBER]
**Unknown:** [The question we're answering]
**Time-box:** [X hours/days]
## Investigation Plan
1. [ ] Check existing codebase for [X]
2. [ ] Review documentation for [Y]
3. [ ] Test/prototype [Z]
4. [ ] Document findings
## Findings
[To be filled during research]
## Recommendation
[To be filled after research]
## Decision Needed
[What decision this enables]
---
**Status:** 🔬 Investigating
**Started:** [DATE]
**Due:** [DATE]"
Each spike should:
# Update spike issue with findings
gh issue comment [SPIKE_NUMBER] --body "## Findings Summary
**Answer:** [The answer to the unknown]
**Evidence:**
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]
**Recommendation:** [Recommended approach]
**Confidence:** [High/Medium/Low]
**Trade-offs:**
- Pro: [X]
- Con: [Y]"
# Close spike
gh issue close [SPIKE_NUMBER]
# Update initiative issue
gh issue comment [INITIATIVE_NUMBER] --body "## Spike Complete: #[SPIKE_NUMBER]
**Unknown:** [Question]
**Answer:** [Answer summary]
**Decision enabled:** [What we can now decide]"
In the initiative issue, maintain a decision log:
## Decisions Log
### Decision 1: [Topic]
**Date:** [DATE]
**Context:** [Why this decision was needed]
**Options Considered:**
1. Option A: [Description] - [Pros/Cons]
2. Option B: [Description] - [Pros/Cons]
3. Option C: [Description] - [Pros/Cons]
**Decision:** Option [X]
**Rationale:** [Why this option]
**Implications:** [What this means for implementation]
**Spike:** #[SPIKE_NUMBER] (if applicable)
---
### Decision 2: [Topic]
...
Use this for each decision:
### Decision: [TITLE]
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Decided by:** [Agent/Human/Both]
**Context:**
[Why this decision was needed now]
**Options:**
| Option | Pros | Cons |
|--------|------|------|
| A: [X] | [+] | [-] |
| B: [Y] | [+] | [-] |
**Decision:** [Chosen option]
**Rationale:**
[Why this option was chosen]
**Reversibility:** [Easy/Hard/Irreversible]
**Related:**
- Spike: #[N] (if applicable)
- Depends on: Decision [X]
- Enables: Decision [Y]
After research spikes complete, group work into epics:
## Epic Structure
### Epic 1: [NAME]
**Goal:** [What this epic delivers]
**Dependencies:** None
**Estimated Issues:** [X-Y]
**Key Deliverables:**
- Deliverable A
- Deliverable B
### Epic 2: [NAME]
**Goal:** [What this epic delivers]
**Dependencies:** Epic 1
**Estimated Issues:** [X-Y]
**Key Deliverables:**
- Deliverable C
- Deliverable D
### Epic 3: [NAME]
**Goal:** [What this epic delivers]
**Dependencies:** Epic 1, Epic 2
**Estimated Issues:** [X-Y]
**Key Deliverables:**
- Deliverable E
# Create initiative label
gh label create "initiative-[NAME]" --color "6E40C9" \
--description "Part of [INITIATIVE NAME] initiative"
# Create epic labels
gh label create "epic-[EPIC1-NAME]" --color "0E8A16" \
--description "[Epic 1 description]"
gh label create "epic-[EPIC2-NAME]" --color "1D76DB" \
--description "[Epic 2 description]"
For each epic, use epic-management skill to create the epic structure.
# Create milestones for delivery phases
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/milestones -X POST \
-f title="[Initiative] Phase 1: [NAME]" \
-f description="[Description of what Phase 1 delivers]" \
-f due_on="YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ"
| Milestone | Epics | Goal |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | Epic 1 | [Foundation] |
| Phase 2 | Epic 2, 3 | [Core Features] |
| Phase 3 | Epic 4 | [Polish & Launch] |
The initiative issue must always contain enough information for a fresh context to continue:
## Context Recovery
**To continue this initiative:**
1. Read this issue completely
2. Review open spikes: [links]
3. Review decision log above
4. Check current epic status: [links]
5. Current phase: [Investigation/Architecture/Implementation]
6. Next action: [Specific next step]
**Key files:**
- [Path to any architecture docs]
- [Path to any design docs]
**Key decisions made:**
1. [Decision 1 summary]
2. [Decision 2 summary]
# Store initiative in knowledge graph
mcp__memory__create_entities([{
"name": "Initiative-[NAME]",
"entityType": "Initiative",
"observations": [
"Created: [DATE]",
"Goal: [GOAL]",
"Tracking Issue: #[NUMBER]",
"Status: [STATUS]",
"Epics: [LIST]",
"Current Phase: [PHASE]"
]
}])
Request: "Add the ability for users to log in by clicking on a popup in their phone."
Critical:
Important:
npx claudepluginhub troykelly/claude-skills --plugin issue-driven-developmentCoordinates multi-project initiative planning across services and repositories. Collects context, defines boundaries, analyzes dependencies, and spawns sub-agents for detailed plans.
Plans new projects or major epics by exploring domain, defining boundaries and architecture, decomposing into phased features, and producing a project plan artifact. Use for multi-feature work.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "start a new project", "greenfield project", "tech debt campaign", "incident response", "feature development", "which preset", "initialize metis", "set up project", or needs guidance on project setup, choosing presets, and applying patterns for different work types.