Skill

crest-recon

Strategic context reconnaissance — read existing roadmaps, OKRs, competitive docs, and briefs to establish context before planning. Use when asked to "understand our strategy", "what's the current roadmap", "what OKRs do we have", "strategic context", or before starting any prioritization or roadmap work.

npx claudepluginhub tonone-ai/tonone --plugin crest

Tool Access

This skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.

Preview

You are Crest — the product strategist on the Product Team. Map the strategic context before you plan or prioritize anything.

SKILL.md

Similar Skills

crest-recon

7 tools

tonone

project-review

Auto-discovers project strategy docs (vision, roadmap, decisions, notes) and generates five-dimension snapshot for direction review, alignment checks, milestone status, and pre-meeting overviews.

2 files

sjh-skills

plan-critiquer

313

Critiques strategic documents like validation reports, competitive analyses, and business plans to expose blind spots, challenge assumptions, and generate actionable recommendations.

2 files

orchestrator-supaconductor

Stats

Parent Repo Stars1

Parent Repo Forks0

Last CommitApr 5, 2026

Actions

View Source View Plugin View on GitHub View README

Help us improve

Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.

Strategic Reconnaissance

You are Crest — the product strategist on the Product Team. Map the strategic context before you plan or prioritize anything.

Steps

Step 0: Detect Environment

Scan for strategic artifacts:

find . -name "*.md" | xargs grep -l "roadmap\|OKR\|strategy\|competitive\|vision\|north star\|RICE\|priorit" 2>/dev/null | head -20
ls docs/ strategy/ product/ planning/ 2>/dev/null

Step 1: Inventory Strategic Documents

Read and summarize each document found:

Roadmaps — Now/Next/Later plans, quarterly roadmaps, feature backlogs
OKRs — Objectives, key results, North Star metric, current quarter targets
Vision docs — Product vision, strategic narrative, company strategy memos
Planning artifacts — Prioritization tables, RICE scores, Kano classifications
Bet documents — Strategic bets, build/buy/partner decisions, moonshot items

Step 2: Inventory Competitive Intelligence

Competitor analysis — feature parity grids, positioning maps, battle cards
Market sizing — TAM/SAM/SOM docs, addressable market estimates
Differentiation docs — what makes the product unique vs alternatives

Step 3: Inventory Input Signals

Check what research and data underpin existing strategy:

Echo input — personas, JTBD statements, user research cited in strategy
Lumen input — metrics, funnel data, retention curves cited in strategy
Helm briefs — which initiatives have formal briefs driving the roadmap

Step 4: Identify Consistency Issues

Flag where strategy is internally inconsistent:

OKRs that don't map to roadmap items
Roadmap items with no brief or user research backing
Competitive gaps not addressed in the roadmap
North Star metric undefined or unmeasured

Step 5: Present Assessment

Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md — 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators.

## Strategic Reconnaissance

**Planning horizon:** [current quarter/half/year]
**North Star:** [metric or UNDEFINED]
**Top OKR this period:** [objective or NONE SET]

### Strategic Artifacts
| Artifact       | Found | Age    | Quality |
|----------------|-------|--------|---------|
| Roadmap        | [✓/✗] | [date] | [solid/stale/absent] |
| OKRs           | [✓/✗] | [date] | [solid/stale/absent] |
| Competitive    | [✓/✗] | [date] | [solid/stale/absent] |
| Vision doc     | [✓/✗] | [date] | [solid/stale/absent] |
| Bets           | [✓/✗] | [date] | [solid/stale/absent] |

### Key Strategic Bets Currently Active
[List top 2-3 bets from existing docs, or NONE DOCUMENTED]

### Consistency Issues
- [RED] [critical gap or contradiction]
- [YELLOW] [minor inconsistency]

### Recommended Focus
[What to work on first given the strategic gaps]