From dev-workflow
Plan a feature before building. Brainstorm the idea, challenge scope, and lock decisions one at a time. Triggers on: 幫我想這個功能, 幫我規劃, 這個怎麼做, 幫我想一下, feature planning, planning mode, 規劃一下, 做這個功能之前先想清楚
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/dev-workflow:feature-plannerThis skill is limited to the following tools:
The summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
When the user describes something they want to build, is thinking about a new feature, or says anything that implies "I need to plan this before coding", activate this skill automatically. Do not wait for an explicit command.
When the user describes something they want to build, is thinking about a new feature, or says anything that implies "I need to plan this before coding", activate this skill automatically. Do not wait for an explicit command.
Never batch multiple questions. Ask one question, wait for the answer, record it, then move to the next.
Every question must be:
After each answer, append the decision to the plan document before asking the next question. Format:
## Decision: [question topic]
- **Chose:** [selected option]
- **Rejected:** [other options with one-line reason why]
- **Timestamp:** [ISO-8601]
The plan document lives at ~/.mystack/projects/<slug>/<date>-<branch>-<feature>-plan.md.
Ask at most 3 of these, one at a time:
After these answers, reframe:
Record the reframe. Get agreement before continuing.
Ask the user to pick a scope mode — this is the only batch question allowed:
我讀完你的想法了。在進入細節之前,我想先確認 scope。
RECOMMENDED: C — 你的描述聽起來 pain 是確認過的,先把核心功能做對最重要。
A) 擴大 scope — 找出隱藏的 10 星版本,每個擴大都是一次獨立確認 B) 選擇性擴大 — 保持 baseline,但列出值得考慮的擴展 C) hold scope — 把現有 plan 做到滴水不漏,不加不減 D) 縮減 scope — 砍到最小可學習版本
Record the mode selection.
Then go through these 10 sections one at a time, asking one question per section only when the answer is not already clear from context:
| # | Section | What to check | Ask only if... |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Problem clarity | 痛點具體嗎? | pain 還是模糊的 |
| 2 | Who it's for | 是真的人嗎? | 還沒有具體對象 |
| 3 | Scope in | 每個項目都直接解決問題嗎? | scope 需要調整 |
| 4 | Scope out | 有「不做」清單嗎? | 還沒有明確排除 |
| 5 | Success metric | 兩週內能量嗎? | 還沒定義成功 |
| 6 | Assumptions | 最關鍵的假設是什麼? | 有未驗證的高風險假設 |
| 7 | 10-star version | 做到極致長什麼樣? | user 想知道上限 |
| 8 | Minimum version | 最小能學到東西的版本? | scope 太大需要縮 |
| 9 | Failure modes | 最可能殺掉這件事的是什麼? | 還沒盤點風險 |
| 10 | Recommendation | SHIP / REVISE / RECONSIDER | — (always ask) |
For each section:
[already addressed]After all decisions are recorded, write the final plan document:
# Feature Plan: [feature name]
_Created: [date] - feature-planner - [repo]:[branch]_
## Problem
[2-3 sentences: the real pain, who has it, why now]
## Reframe
[What the user said vs. what they were actually describing]
## Scope decisions
### Chosen scope
- [item] - reason
### Explicitly out
- [item] - reason
### Deferred
- [item] - reason
## Assumptions to validate
- [assumption] - risk if wrong: [consequence]
## Success metric
[Measurable, 2-week horizon]
## Failure modes
- [risk] - mitigation: [what to do]
## Decisions log
[All recorded decisions from Phase 1-2]
## Next step
Run eng-architect to lock architecture and build convergence artifacts.
echo "{\"ts\":\"$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)\",\"skill\":\"feature-planner\",\"branch\":\"$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo 'N/A')\",\"outcome\":\"success\",\"repo\":\"$(basename $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null) 2>/dev/null || echo 'N/A')\"}" >> ~/.mystack/timeline.jsonl
npx claudepluginhub timlai666/skills --plugin dev-workflowGuides reception of code review feedback: verify before implementing, avoid performative agreement, push back with technical reasoning when needed.
Design banners for social media, ads, website heroes, and print with multiple art direction options and AI-generated visuals.